The importance of institutional asymmetries to the development of binational aquifer assessment programs: The Arizona-Sonora experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Setting water policy depends fundamentally on the location of the supply and demand for water and the legal/institutional framework for water management. Within and across nations, laws and structures for water management decision making vary, often significantly. Recognizing these differences can aid in overcoming challenges inherent to the assessment and management of transboundary waters. This paper examines current binational efforts to develop the scientific information to support water management decision making along the United States-Mexico border. The particular focus is on transboundary aquifers along the border shared by the states of Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico. Legislation enacted in the United States (Public Law 109-448) established a governmental-academic partnership to assess transboundary aquifers. The paper discusses the establishment of a working partnership between Mexico and the United States, which led to an official binational cooperative framework for transboundary assessment. It explains how the extensive effort to recognize and accommodate asymmetries in the underlying legal and regulatory frameworks for water management was essential to meeting the objectives of both countries. The focus of the binational investigations is briefly discussed. The paper concludes by noting the opportunities for additional cross-border scientific and water management collaboration should funding and institutional commitments continue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)949-963
Number of pages15
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Groundwater
Water management
Aquifers
water management
asymmetry
aquifers
aquifer
Water
Mexico
management decision
experience
water
legislation
Decision making
decision making
Decision Making
public law
institutional framework
regulatory framework
water policy

Keywords

  • Institutional asymmetries
  • Transboundary aquifers
  • Transboundary waters
  • Water management
  • Water policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Biochemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{8dcc9919a84b4727981aec82c69a51f8,
title = "The importance of institutional asymmetries to the development of binational aquifer assessment programs: The Arizona-Sonora experience",
abstract = "Setting water policy depends fundamentally on the location of the supply and demand for water and the legal/institutional framework for water management. Within and across nations, laws and structures for water management decision making vary, often significantly. Recognizing these differences can aid in overcoming challenges inherent to the assessment and management of transboundary waters. This paper examines current binational efforts to develop the scientific information to support water management decision making along the United States-Mexico border. The particular focus is on transboundary aquifers along the border shared by the states of Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico. Legislation enacted in the United States (Public Law 109-448) established a governmental-academic partnership to assess transboundary aquifers. The paper discusses the establishment of a working partnership between Mexico and the United States, which led to an official binational cooperative framework for transboundary assessment. It explains how the extensive effort to recognize and accommodate asymmetries in the underlying legal and regulatory frameworks for water management was essential to meeting the objectives of both countries. The focus of the binational investigations is briefly discussed. The paper concludes by noting the opportunities for additional cross-border scientific and water management collaboration should funding and institutional commitments continue.",
keywords = "Institutional asymmetries, Transboundary aquifers, Transboundary waters, Water management, Water policy",
author = "Megdal, {Sharon B} and Scott, {Christopher A}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3390/w3030949",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "949--963",
journal = "Water (Switzerland)",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of institutional asymmetries to the development of binational aquifer assessment programs

T2 - The Arizona-Sonora experience

AU - Megdal, Sharon B

AU - Scott, Christopher A

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Setting water policy depends fundamentally on the location of the supply and demand for water and the legal/institutional framework for water management. Within and across nations, laws and structures for water management decision making vary, often significantly. Recognizing these differences can aid in overcoming challenges inherent to the assessment and management of transboundary waters. This paper examines current binational efforts to develop the scientific information to support water management decision making along the United States-Mexico border. The particular focus is on transboundary aquifers along the border shared by the states of Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico. Legislation enacted in the United States (Public Law 109-448) established a governmental-academic partnership to assess transboundary aquifers. The paper discusses the establishment of a working partnership between Mexico and the United States, which led to an official binational cooperative framework for transboundary assessment. It explains how the extensive effort to recognize and accommodate asymmetries in the underlying legal and regulatory frameworks for water management was essential to meeting the objectives of both countries. The focus of the binational investigations is briefly discussed. The paper concludes by noting the opportunities for additional cross-border scientific and water management collaboration should funding and institutional commitments continue.

AB - Setting water policy depends fundamentally on the location of the supply and demand for water and the legal/institutional framework for water management. Within and across nations, laws and structures for water management decision making vary, often significantly. Recognizing these differences can aid in overcoming challenges inherent to the assessment and management of transboundary waters. This paper examines current binational efforts to develop the scientific information to support water management decision making along the United States-Mexico border. The particular focus is on transboundary aquifers along the border shared by the states of Arizona in the United States and Sonora in Mexico. Legislation enacted in the United States (Public Law 109-448) established a governmental-academic partnership to assess transboundary aquifers. The paper discusses the establishment of a working partnership between Mexico and the United States, which led to an official binational cooperative framework for transboundary assessment. It explains how the extensive effort to recognize and accommodate asymmetries in the underlying legal and regulatory frameworks for water management was essential to meeting the objectives of both countries. The focus of the binational investigations is briefly discussed. The paper concludes by noting the opportunities for additional cross-border scientific and water management collaboration should funding and institutional commitments continue.

KW - Institutional asymmetries

KW - Transboundary aquifers

KW - Transboundary waters

KW - Water management

KW - Water policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981312251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981312251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/w3030949

DO - 10.3390/w3030949

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981312251

VL - 3

SP - 949

EP - 963

JO - Water (Switzerland)

JF - Water (Switzerland)

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 3

ER -