The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores

Jose M. Cortina, Nancy B. Goldstein, Stephanie C. Payne, H. Kristl Davison, Stephen W Gilliland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that scores on measures of cognitive ability, measures of Conscientiousness, and interview scores are positively correlated with job performance. There remains, however, a question of incremental validity: To what extent do interviews predict above and beyond cognitive ability and Conscientiousness? This question was addressed in this paper by (a) conducting meta-analyses of the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and interviews, (b) combining these results with predictive validity results from previous meta-analyses to form a "meta-correlation matrix" representing the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, interviews, and job performance, and (c) performing 9 hierarchical regressions to examine the incremental validity of 3 levels of structured interviews in best, actual, and worst case scenarios for prediction. Results suggested that interview scores contribute to the prediction of job performance over and above cognitive ability and Conscientiousness to the extent that they are structured, with scores from highly structured interviews contributing substantially to prediction. Directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-347
Number of pages23
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Volume53
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Interviews
Meta-Analysis
Conscientiousness
Incremental
Cognitive ability
Reproducibility of Results
Prediction
Job performance
Research
Work Performance
Structured interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. / Cortina, Jose M.; Goldstein, Nancy B.; Payne, Stephanie C.; Davison, H. Kristl; Gilliland, Stephen W.

In: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 06.2000, p. 325-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cortina, Jose M. ; Goldstein, Nancy B. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Davison, H. Kristl ; Gilliland, Stephen W. / The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. In: Personnel Psychology. 2000 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 325-347.
@article{b558682a364543f1b7d5f82808809359,
title = "The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores",
abstract = "Recent research has suggested that scores on measures of cognitive ability, measures of Conscientiousness, and interview scores are positively correlated with job performance. There remains, however, a question of incremental validity: To what extent do interviews predict above and beyond cognitive ability and Conscientiousness? This question was addressed in this paper by (a) conducting meta-analyses of the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and interviews, (b) combining these results with predictive validity results from previous meta-analyses to form a {"}meta-correlation matrix{"} representing the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, interviews, and job performance, and (c) performing 9 hierarchical regressions to examine the incremental validity of 3 levels of structured interviews in best, actual, and worst case scenarios for prediction. Results suggested that interview scores contribute to the prediction of job performance over and above cognitive ability and Conscientiousness to the extent that they are structured, with scores from highly structured interviews contributing substantially to prediction. Directions for future research are discussed.",
author = "Cortina, {Jose M.} and Goldstein, {Nancy B.} and Payne, {Stephanie C.} and Davison, {H. Kristl} and Gilliland, {Stephen W}",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "325--347",
journal = "Personnel Psychology",
issn = "0031-5826",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores

AU - Cortina, Jose M.

AU - Goldstein, Nancy B.

AU - Payne, Stephanie C.

AU - Davison, H. Kristl

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - Recent research has suggested that scores on measures of cognitive ability, measures of Conscientiousness, and interview scores are positively correlated with job performance. There remains, however, a question of incremental validity: To what extent do interviews predict above and beyond cognitive ability and Conscientiousness? This question was addressed in this paper by (a) conducting meta-analyses of the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and interviews, (b) combining these results with predictive validity results from previous meta-analyses to form a "meta-correlation matrix" representing the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, interviews, and job performance, and (c) performing 9 hierarchical regressions to examine the incremental validity of 3 levels of structured interviews in best, actual, and worst case scenarios for prediction. Results suggested that interview scores contribute to the prediction of job performance over and above cognitive ability and Conscientiousness to the extent that they are structured, with scores from highly structured interviews contributing substantially to prediction. Directions for future research are discussed.

AB - Recent research has suggested that scores on measures of cognitive ability, measures of Conscientiousness, and interview scores are positively correlated with job performance. There remains, however, a question of incremental validity: To what extent do interviews predict above and beyond cognitive ability and Conscientiousness? This question was addressed in this paper by (a) conducting meta-analyses of the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, and interviews, (b) combining these results with predictive validity results from previous meta-analyses to form a "meta-correlation matrix" representing the relationships among cognitive ability, Conscientiousness, interviews, and job performance, and (c) performing 9 hierarchical regressions to examine the incremental validity of 3 levels of structured interviews in best, actual, and worst case scenarios for prediction. Results suggested that interview scores contribute to the prediction of job performance over and above cognitive ability and Conscientiousness to the extent that they are structured, with scores from highly structured interviews contributing substantially to prediction. Directions for future research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034195865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034195865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034195865

VL - 53

SP - 325

EP - 347

JO - Personnel Psychology

JF - Personnel Psychology

SN - 0031-5826

IS - 2

ER -