The inherent limitations of sequential arterial bypass grafts

A hemodynamic study

Joseph L Mills, Jacob G. Robison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While proximal bypass graft flows are known to Increase by the sequential technique, the possibility of a "steal phenomenon" caused by the intermediate anastomosis has been raised. We compared graft and distal flow rates using simple reversed vein versus sequential bypass grafts in a canine model. A blind segment was created by occluding the common iliac artery above and the superficial femoral artery below a profunda femoris artery equivalent, which served as runoff from the blind segment. Reversed saphenous vein harvested from the contralateral thigh in seven anesthetized dogs was used to perform a simple common iliac artery to superficial femoral artery bypass. Graft and distal superficial femoral artery flows were measured with a calibrated flow probe of appropriate diameter (3-5 mm). A sequential side-to-side vein graft to arterial blind segment anastomosis was then added and flow measurements repeated after equilibration. Mean graft flow increased by 20 cc/min with the sequential technique (p = 0.05), while distal flow actually decreased by 1 cc/min (NS). Although no "steal phenomenon" was demonstrated, distal flow was not significantly improved by the sequential technique. We conclude that no convincing case based on presumed hemodynamic superiority can be made for performing sequential bypass in preference to standard reversed vein bypass. The increased potential for technical error introduced by the additional anastomosis and the lack of any demonstrable augmentation in distal flow suggest inherent limitations of the technique, and caution against its widespread use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-199
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hemodynamics
Transplants
Femoral Artery
Veins
Iliac Artery
Saphenous Vein
Thigh
Canidae
Arteries
Dogs

Keywords

  • hemodynamic
  • peripheral vascular
  • Sequential arterial bypass grafts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The inherent limitations of sequential arterial bypass grafts : A hemodynamic study. / Mills, Joseph L; Robison, Jacob G.

In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1989, p. 195-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1b0567f0caa4a3e9a81397e11051ad8,
title = "The inherent limitations of sequential arterial bypass grafts: A hemodynamic study",
abstract = "While proximal bypass graft flows are known to Increase by the sequential technique, the possibility of a {"}steal phenomenon{"} caused by the intermediate anastomosis has been raised. We compared graft and distal flow rates using simple reversed vein versus sequential bypass grafts in a canine model. A blind segment was created by occluding the common iliac artery above and the superficial femoral artery below a profunda femoris artery equivalent, which served as runoff from the blind segment. Reversed saphenous vein harvested from the contralateral thigh in seven anesthetized dogs was used to perform a simple common iliac artery to superficial femoral artery bypass. Graft and distal superficial femoral artery flows were measured with a calibrated flow probe of appropriate diameter (3-5 mm). A sequential side-to-side vein graft to arterial blind segment anastomosis was then added and flow measurements repeated after equilibration. Mean graft flow increased by 20 cc/min with the sequential technique (p = 0.05), while distal flow actually decreased by 1 cc/min (NS). Although no {"}steal phenomenon{"} was demonstrated, distal flow was not significantly improved by the sequential technique. We conclude that no convincing case based on presumed hemodynamic superiority can be made for performing sequential bypass in preference to standard reversed vein bypass. The increased potential for technical error introduced by the additional anastomosis and the lack of any demonstrable augmentation in distal flow suggest inherent limitations of the technique, and caution against its widespread use.",
keywords = "hemodynamic, peripheral vascular, Sequential arterial bypass grafts",
author = "Mills, {Joseph L} and Robison, {Jacob G.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1007/BF03187392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "195--199",
journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inherent limitations of sequential arterial bypass grafts

T2 - A hemodynamic study

AU - Mills, Joseph L

AU - Robison, Jacob G.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - While proximal bypass graft flows are known to Increase by the sequential technique, the possibility of a "steal phenomenon" caused by the intermediate anastomosis has been raised. We compared graft and distal flow rates using simple reversed vein versus sequential bypass grafts in a canine model. A blind segment was created by occluding the common iliac artery above and the superficial femoral artery below a profunda femoris artery equivalent, which served as runoff from the blind segment. Reversed saphenous vein harvested from the contralateral thigh in seven anesthetized dogs was used to perform a simple common iliac artery to superficial femoral artery bypass. Graft and distal superficial femoral artery flows were measured with a calibrated flow probe of appropriate diameter (3-5 mm). A sequential side-to-side vein graft to arterial blind segment anastomosis was then added and flow measurements repeated after equilibration. Mean graft flow increased by 20 cc/min with the sequential technique (p = 0.05), while distal flow actually decreased by 1 cc/min (NS). Although no "steal phenomenon" was demonstrated, distal flow was not significantly improved by the sequential technique. We conclude that no convincing case based on presumed hemodynamic superiority can be made for performing sequential bypass in preference to standard reversed vein bypass. The increased potential for technical error introduced by the additional anastomosis and the lack of any demonstrable augmentation in distal flow suggest inherent limitations of the technique, and caution against its widespread use.

AB - While proximal bypass graft flows are known to Increase by the sequential technique, the possibility of a "steal phenomenon" caused by the intermediate anastomosis has been raised. We compared graft and distal flow rates using simple reversed vein versus sequential bypass grafts in a canine model. A blind segment was created by occluding the common iliac artery above and the superficial femoral artery below a profunda femoris artery equivalent, which served as runoff from the blind segment. Reversed saphenous vein harvested from the contralateral thigh in seven anesthetized dogs was used to perform a simple common iliac artery to superficial femoral artery bypass. Graft and distal superficial femoral artery flows were measured with a calibrated flow probe of appropriate diameter (3-5 mm). A sequential side-to-side vein graft to arterial blind segment anastomosis was then added and flow measurements repeated after equilibration. Mean graft flow increased by 20 cc/min with the sequential technique (p = 0.05), while distal flow actually decreased by 1 cc/min (NS). Although no "steal phenomenon" was demonstrated, distal flow was not significantly improved by the sequential technique. We conclude that no convincing case based on presumed hemodynamic superiority can be made for performing sequential bypass in preference to standard reversed vein bypass. The increased potential for technical error introduced by the additional anastomosis and the lack of any demonstrable augmentation in distal flow suggest inherent limitations of the technique, and caution against its widespread use.

KW - hemodynamic

KW - peripheral vascular

KW - Sequential arterial bypass grafts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030132153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030132153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03187392

DO - 10.1007/BF03187392

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 195

EP - 199

JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0890-5096

IS - 3

ER -