The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences

Thomas G Bever, M. F. Garrett, R. Hurtig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

General principles of speech perception resolve several experimental conflicts about whether listeners interpret one or all meanings of an ambiguous sentence We argue that during all ambiguous clause, both meanings are processed, but immediately after the clause over, it recoded with only one meaning retained This model resolves the apparently conflicting results of previous experimental, it also predicts that underlying structure ambiguity m incomplete clauses increases Comprehension time In complete clauses, ambiguity does not increase relative comprehension time; it may reduce comprehension time for ambiguities whose interpretations are perceptually distinct in those tasks where either meaning is appropriate Two new experiments offer preliminary confirmation of these predictions

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-286
Number of pages10
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1973
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Speech Perception
Clause
Interaction
Perceptual Processes
Conflict (Psychology)
Listeners
Prediction
Incomplete
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences. / Bever, Thomas G; Garrett, M. F.; Hurtig, R.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 1, No. 3, 09.1973, p. 277-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bever, Thomas G ; Garrett, M. F. ; Hurtig, R. / The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences. In: Memory and Cognition. 1973 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 277-286.
@article{8e63b0c87fc849d1870a99fe5bc83b60,
title = "The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences",
abstract = "General principles of speech perception resolve several experimental conflicts about whether listeners interpret one or all meanings of an ambiguous sentence We argue that during all ambiguous clause, both meanings are processed, but immediately after the clause over, it recoded with only one meaning retained This model resolves the apparently conflicting results of previous experimental, it also predicts that underlying structure ambiguity m incomplete clauses increases Comprehension time In complete clauses, ambiguity does not increase relative comprehension time; it may reduce comprehension time for ambiguities whose interpretations are perceptually distinct in those tasks where either meaning is appropriate Two new experiments offer preliminary confirmation of these predictions",
author = "Bever, {Thomas G} and Garrett, {M. F.} and R. Hurtig",
year = "1973",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3758/BF03198109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "277--286",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences

AU - Bever, Thomas G

AU - Garrett, M. F.

AU - Hurtig, R.

PY - 1973/9

Y1 - 1973/9

N2 - General principles of speech perception resolve several experimental conflicts about whether listeners interpret one or all meanings of an ambiguous sentence We argue that during all ambiguous clause, both meanings are processed, but immediately after the clause over, it recoded with only one meaning retained This model resolves the apparently conflicting results of previous experimental, it also predicts that underlying structure ambiguity m incomplete clauses increases Comprehension time In complete clauses, ambiguity does not increase relative comprehension time; it may reduce comprehension time for ambiguities whose interpretations are perceptually distinct in those tasks where either meaning is appropriate Two new experiments offer preliminary confirmation of these predictions

AB - General principles of speech perception resolve several experimental conflicts about whether listeners interpret one or all meanings of an ambiguous sentence We argue that during all ambiguous clause, both meanings are processed, but immediately after the clause over, it recoded with only one meaning retained This model resolves the apparently conflicting results of previous experimental, it also predicts that underlying structure ambiguity m incomplete clauses increases Comprehension time In complete clauses, ambiguity does not increase relative comprehension time; it may reduce comprehension time for ambiguities whose interpretations are perceptually distinct in those tasks where either meaning is appropriate Two new experiments offer preliminary confirmation of these predictions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015805366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015805366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03198109

DO - 10.3758/BF03198109

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 277

EP - 286

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 3

ER -