The knowledge pyramid: A critique of the DIKW hierarchy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper evaluates the datag-informationg-knowledgeg-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the 'knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as 'weak knowledge', that knowledge also is 'weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-142
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Information Science
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Information science
wisdom
information science
Information management
Acoustic waves
information management
possession
Values

Keywords

  • Data
  • Information
  • Knowledge
  • The DIKW hierarchy
  • The knowledge hierarchy
  • The knowledge pyramid
  • Wisdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

The knowledge pyramid : A critique of the DIKW hierarchy. / Fricke, Martin H.

In: Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 131-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca118be75ae24a318af47c451452bc16,
title = "The knowledge pyramid: A critique of the DIKW hierarchy",
abstract = "The paper evaluates the datag-informationg-knowledgeg-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the 'knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as 'weak knowledge', that knowledge also is 'weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.",
keywords = "Data, Information, Knowledge, The DIKW hierarchy, The knowledge hierarchy, The knowledge pyramid, Wisdom",
author = "Fricke, {Martin H}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0165551508094050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "131--142",
journal = "Journal of Information Science",
issn = "0165-5515",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The knowledge pyramid

T2 - A critique of the DIKW hierarchy

AU - Fricke, Martin H

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The paper evaluates the datag-informationg-knowledgeg-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the 'knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as 'weak knowledge', that knowledge also is 'weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.

AB - The paper evaluates the datag-informationg-knowledgeg-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy, also known as the 'knowledge hierarchy', is part of the canon of information science and management. Arguments are offered that the hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories, of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other literature as 'weak knowledge', that knowledge also is 'weak knowledge' and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of that knowledge.

KW - Data

KW - Information

KW - Knowledge

KW - The DIKW hierarchy

KW - The knowledge hierarchy

KW - The knowledge pyramid

KW - Wisdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62449224724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62449224724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0165551508094050

DO - 10.1177/0165551508094050

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:62449224724

VL - 35

SP - 131

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Information Science

JF - Journal of Information Science

SN - 0165-5515

IS - 2

ER -