The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics

David A Raichlen, Herman Pontzer, Michael D. Sockol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A critical question in human evolution is whether the earliest bipeds walked with a bent-hip, bent-knee gait or on more extended hindlimbs. The differences between these gaits are not trivial, because the adoption of either has important implications for the evolution of bipedalism. In this study, we re-examined the Laetoli footprints to determine whether they can provide information on the locomotor posture of early hominins. Previous researchers have suggested that the stride lengths of Laetoli hominins fall within the range of modern human stride lengths and therefore, Laetoli hominins walked with modern-human-like kinematics. Using a dynamic-similarity analysis, we compared Laetoli hominin stride lengths with those of both modern humans and chimpanzees. Our results indicate that Laetoli hominins could have used either a bent-hip, bent-knee gait, similar to a chimpanzee, or an extended-hindlimb gait, similar to a human. In fact, our data suggest that the Laetoli hominins could have walked near their preferred speeds using either limb posture. This result contrasts with most previous studies, which suggest relatively slow walking speeds for these early bipeds. Despite the many attempts to discern limb-joint kinematics from Laetoli stride lengths, our study concludes that stride lengths alone do not resolve the debate over early hominin locomotor postures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-117
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

posture
kinematics
footprint
gait
limb
bipedalism
knees
human evolution
hips
limbs (animal)
Pan troglodytes
walking
joints (animal)
researchers
speed
hindlimbs

Keywords

  • Australopithecus
  • Biomechanics
  • Bipedalism
  • Chimpanzee
  • Dynamic similarity
  • Froude number
  • Stride length

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics. / Raichlen, David A; Pontzer, Herman; Sockol, Michael D.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 112-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raichlen, David A ; Pontzer, Herman ; Sockol, Michael D. / The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics. In: Journal of Human Evolution. 2008 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 112-117.
@article{6618d682e8a74ea68b21d131820e5199,
title = "The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics",
abstract = "A critical question in human evolution is whether the earliest bipeds walked with a bent-hip, bent-knee gait or on more extended hindlimbs. The differences between these gaits are not trivial, because the adoption of either has important implications for the evolution of bipedalism. In this study, we re-examined the Laetoli footprints to determine whether they can provide information on the locomotor posture of early hominins. Previous researchers have suggested that the stride lengths of Laetoli hominins fall within the range of modern human stride lengths and therefore, Laetoli hominins walked with modern-human-like kinematics. Using a dynamic-similarity analysis, we compared Laetoli hominin stride lengths with those of both modern humans and chimpanzees. Our results indicate that Laetoli hominins could have used either a bent-hip, bent-knee gait, similar to a chimpanzee, or an extended-hindlimb gait, similar to a human. In fact, our data suggest that the Laetoli hominins could have walked near their preferred speeds using either limb posture. This result contrasts with most previous studies, which suggest relatively slow walking speeds for these early bipeds. Despite the many attempts to discern limb-joint kinematics from Laetoli stride lengths, our study concludes that stride lengths alone do not resolve the debate over early hominin locomotor postures.",
keywords = "Australopithecus, Biomechanics, Bipedalism, Chimpanzee, Dynamic similarity, Froude number, Stride length",
author = "Raichlen, {David A} and Herman Pontzer and Sockol, {Michael D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "112--117",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Laetoli footprints and early hominin locomotor kinematics

AU - Raichlen, David A

AU - Pontzer, Herman

AU - Sockol, Michael D.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - A critical question in human evolution is whether the earliest bipeds walked with a bent-hip, bent-knee gait or on more extended hindlimbs. The differences between these gaits are not trivial, because the adoption of either has important implications for the evolution of bipedalism. In this study, we re-examined the Laetoli footprints to determine whether they can provide information on the locomotor posture of early hominins. Previous researchers have suggested that the stride lengths of Laetoli hominins fall within the range of modern human stride lengths and therefore, Laetoli hominins walked with modern-human-like kinematics. Using a dynamic-similarity analysis, we compared Laetoli hominin stride lengths with those of both modern humans and chimpanzees. Our results indicate that Laetoli hominins could have used either a bent-hip, bent-knee gait, similar to a chimpanzee, or an extended-hindlimb gait, similar to a human. In fact, our data suggest that the Laetoli hominins could have walked near their preferred speeds using either limb posture. This result contrasts with most previous studies, which suggest relatively slow walking speeds for these early bipeds. Despite the many attempts to discern limb-joint kinematics from Laetoli stride lengths, our study concludes that stride lengths alone do not resolve the debate over early hominin locomotor postures.

AB - A critical question in human evolution is whether the earliest bipeds walked with a bent-hip, bent-knee gait or on more extended hindlimbs. The differences between these gaits are not trivial, because the adoption of either has important implications for the evolution of bipedalism. In this study, we re-examined the Laetoli footprints to determine whether they can provide information on the locomotor posture of early hominins. Previous researchers have suggested that the stride lengths of Laetoli hominins fall within the range of modern human stride lengths and therefore, Laetoli hominins walked with modern-human-like kinematics. Using a dynamic-similarity analysis, we compared Laetoli hominin stride lengths with those of both modern humans and chimpanzees. Our results indicate that Laetoli hominins could have used either a bent-hip, bent-knee gait, similar to a chimpanzee, or an extended-hindlimb gait, similar to a human. In fact, our data suggest that the Laetoli hominins could have walked near their preferred speeds using either limb posture. This result contrasts with most previous studies, which suggest relatively slow walking speeds for these early bipeds. Despite the many attempts to discern limb-joint kinematics from Laetoli stride lengths, our study concludes that stride lengths alone do not resolve the debate over early hominin locomotor postures.

KW - Australopithecus

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Bipedalism

KW - Chimpanzee

KW - Dynamic similarity

KW - Froude number

KW - Stride length

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349144585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349144585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 17804036

AN - SCOPUS:38349144585

VL - 54

SP - 112

EP - 117

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 1

ER -