The Land Ethic of Ranchers: A Core Value Despite Divergent Views of Government

Aaron M. Lien, Colleen Svancara, Wendy Vanasco, George B Ruyle, Laura López-Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the western United States, the management and use of public lands for livestock grazing is a frequent source of conflict among environmentalists, federal agencies, and ranchers. Since at least the early 1980s, the rhetoric of the "sagebrush rebellion" has reinforced a public perception that ranchers are both antigovernment and anticonservation. Sustainable management of public lands used for livestock grazing depends on both federal agency personnel, who enforce regulations, and ranchers, who use the land and implement management plans on a day-to-day basis. As a result, the attitudes of ranchers toward conservation can have a significant impact on the overall ecological health of public rangelands. We conducted a study of ranchers in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico using Q Methodology to understand their views and motivations about ranching, conservation, and the government. Our results show three complex viewpoints, which we term radical center ranchers (20% of variance), innovative conservationists (19% of variance), and traditional ranchers (12% of variance). A commitment to conservation and corresponding lack of anticonservation sentiment is held across these viewpoints. Mistrust of government coexists with conservation values for two groups. This information is useful for finding common ground between ranchers and government officials, conservationists, and extension agents on range management and conservation goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalRangeland Ecology and Management
Volume70
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

ranchers
ethics
livestock
grazing
public lands
ranching
rangeland
extension agents
land
range management
Western United States
Artemisia
rangelands
methodology
public
human resources
land use

Keywords

  • antigovernment sentiment
  • attitudes of ranchers
  • conservation
  • large landscape conservation
  • Q Methodology
  • radical center

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The Land Ethic of Ranchers : A Core Value Despite Divergent Views of Government. / Lien, Aaron M.; Svancara, Colleen; Vanasco, Wendy; Ruyle, George B; López-Hoffman, Laura.

In: Rangeland Ecology and Management, Vol. 70, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 787-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{081736be23c14d1bb0d851b1ad2e545f,
title = "The Land Ethic of Ranchers: A Core Value Despite Divergent Views of Government",
abstract = "In the western United States, the management and use of public lands for livestock grazing is a frequent source of conflict among environmentalists, federal agencies, and ranchers. Since at least the early 1980s, the rhetoric of the {"}sagebrush rebellion{"} has reinforced a public perception that ranchers are both antigovernment and anticonservation. Sustainable management of public lands used for livestock grazing depends on both federal agency personnel, who enforce regulations, and ranchers, who use the land and implement management plans on a day-to-day basis. As a result, the attitudes of ranchers toward conservation can have a significant impact on the overall ecological health of public rangelands. We conducted a study of ranchers in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico using Q Methodology to understand their views and motivations about ranching, conservation, and the government. Our results show three complex viewpoints, which we term radical center ranchers (20{\%} of variance), innovative conservationists (19{\%} of variance), and traditional ranchers (12{\%} of variance). A commitment to conservation and corresponding lack of anticonservation sentiment is held across these viewpoints. Mistrust of government coexists with conservation values for two groups. This information is useful for finding common ground between ranchers and government officials, conservationists, and extension agents on range management and conservation goals.",
keywords = "antigovernment sentiment, attitudes of ranchers, conservation, large landscape conservation, Q Methodology, radical center",
author = "Lien, {Aaron M.} and Colleen Svancara and Wendy Vanasco and Ruyle, {George B} and Laura L{\'o}pez-Hoffman",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Rangeland Ecology and Management",
issn = "1550-7424",
publisher = "Society for Range Management",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Land Ethic of Ranchers

T2 - A Core Value Despite Divergent Views of Government

AU - Lien, Aaron M.

AU - Svancara, Colleen

AU - Vanasco, Wendy

AU - Ruyle, George B

AU - López-Hoffman, Laura

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - In the western United States, the management and use of public lands for livestock grazing is a frequent source of conflict among environmentalists, federal agencies, and ranchers. Since at least the early 1980s, the rhetoric of the "sagebrush rebellion" has reinforced a public perception that ranchers are both antigovernment and anticonservation. Sustainable management of public lands used for livestock grazing depends on both federal agency personnel, who enforce regulations, and ranchers, who use the land and implement management plans on a day-to-day basis. As a result, the attitudes of ranchers toward conservation can have a significant impact on the overall ecological health of public rangelands. We conducted a study of ranchers in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico using Q Methodology to understand their views and motivations about ranching, conservation, and the government. Our results show three complex viewpoints, which we term radical center ranchers (20% of variance), innovative conservationists (19% of variance), and traditional ranchers (12% of variance). A commitment to conservation and corresponding lack of anticonservation sentiment is held across these viewpoints. Mistrust of government coexists with conservation values for two groups. This information is useful for finding common ground between ranchers and government officials, conservationists, and extension agents on range management and conservation goals.

AB - In the western United States, the management and use of public lands for livestock grazing is a frequent source of conflict among environmentalists, federal agencies, and ranchers. Since at least the early 1980s, the rhetoric of the "sagebrush rebellion" has reinforced a public perception that ranchers are both antigovernment and anticonservation. Sustainable management of public lands used for livestock grazing depends on both federal agency personnel, who enforce regulations, and ranchers, who use the land and implement management plans on a day-to-day basis. As a result, the attitudes of ranchers toward conservation can have a significant impact on the overall ecological health of public rangelands. We conducted a study of ranchers in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico using Q Methodology to understand their views and motivations about ranching, conservation, and the government. Our results show three complex viewpoints, which we term radical center ranchers (20% of variance), innovative conservationists (19% of variance), and traditional ranchers (12% of variance). A commitment to conservation and corresponding lack of anticonservation sentiment is held across these viewpoints. Mistrust of government coexists with conservation values for two groups. This information is useful for finding common ground between ranchers and government officials, conservationists, and extension agents on range management and conservation goals.

KW - antigovernment sentiment

KW - attitudes of ranchers

KW - conservation

KW - large landscape conservation

KW - Q Methodology

KW - radical center

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032872009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032872009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032872009

VL - 70

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Rangeland Ecology and Management

JF - Rangeland Ecology and Management

SN - 1550-7424

IS - 6

ER -