The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility

Bruce R Beattie, Jeffrey T. LaFrance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-271
Number of pages9
JournalReview of Agricultural Economics
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

marginal utility
students
mathematics
utility functions
Law
demand
student
college students
graduate
geometry
Marginal utility
Law of demand
Mathematics
Graduate students
Geometry
Undergraduate
Utility function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility. / Beattie, Bruce R; LaFrance, Jeffrey T.

In: Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 06.2006, p. 263-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beattie, Bruce R ; LaFrance, Jeffrey T. / The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility. In: Review of Agricultural Economics. 2006 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 263-271.
@article{f21e59bc6f5743fd81fb72240a9a7532,
title = "The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility",
abstract = "Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.",
author = "Beattie, {Bruce R} and LaFrance, {Jeffrey T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "263--271",
journal = "Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy",
issn = "2040-5790",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility

AU - Beattie, Bruce R

AU - LaFrance, Jeffrey T.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

AB - Diminishing marginal utility (DMU) is neither necessary nor sufficient for downward-sloping demand. Yet, upper-division undergraduate and beginning graduate students often presume otherwise. This paper provides two simple counter-examples that can be used to help students understand that the Law of Demand does not depend on DMU. The examples are accompanied with the geometry and basic mathematics of the utility functions and the implied ordinary/Marshallian demands.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646018586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646018586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00286.x

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 263

EP - 271

JO - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

JF - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

SN - 2040-5790

IS - 2

ER -