The “law of small numbers”

An unexpected and incidental replication

Ivo L Abraham, Samuel Schultz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Thirty-seven graduate students in nursing were given the problem set, used by Tversky and Kahneman in their study on the “law of small numbers,” as an extra credit part of a final examination for a statistics course. While some conservativism was noted, the major Tversky and Kahneman postulates were supported. These incidentally obtained replication data provide support for the contention that the tendency, induced by representativeness, to confidently make inferences is only slightly, if at all, determined by factors such as statistical and empirical sophistication, availability of normative criteria, knowledge about the shortcomings of human judgment, and the conditions under which inferences are to be made.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-188
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Students
credit
nursing
statistics
graduate
examination
Law
student
Replication
Inference
Graduate students
Factors
Nursing
Statistics
Credit
Sophistication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Education
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The “law of small numbers” : An unexpected and incidental replication. / Abraham, Ivo L; Schultz, Samuel.

In: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, Vol. 117, No. 2, 1984, p. 183-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{073fda0903de40c6bc9540bd103430de,
title = "The “law of small numbers”: An unexpected and incidental replication",
abstract = "Thirty-seven graduate students in nursing were given the problem set, used by Tversky and Kahneman in their study on the “law of small numbers,” as an extra credit part of a final examination for a statistics course. While some conservativism was noted, the major Tversky and Kahneman postulates were supported. These incidentally obtained replication data provide support for the contention that the tendency, induced by representativeness, to confidently make inferences is only slightly, if at all, determined by factors such as statistical and empirical sophistication, availability of normative criteria, knowledge about the shortcomings of human judgment, and the conditions under which inferences are to be made.",
author = "Abraham, {Ivo L} and Samuel Schultz",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1080/00223980.1984.9923675",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "183--188",
journal = "Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied",
issn = "0022-3980",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “law of small numbers”

T2 - An unexpected and incidental replication

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

AU - Schultz, Samuel

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Thirty-seven graduate students in nursing were given the problem set, used by Tversky and Kahneman in their study on the “law of small numbers,” as an extra credit part of a final examination for a statistics course. While some conservativism was noted, the major Tversky and Kahneman postulates were supported. These incidentally obtained replication data provide support for the contention that the tendency, induced by representativeness, to confidently make inferences is only slightly, if at all, determined by factors such as statistical and empirical sophistication, availability of normative criteria, knowledge about the shortcomings of human judgment, and the conditions under which inferences are to be made.

AB - Thirty-seven graduate students in nursing were given the problem set, used by Tversky and Kahneman in their study on the “law of small numbers,” as an extra credit part of a final examination for a statistics course. While some conservativism was noted, the major Tversky and Kahneman postulates were supported. These incidentally obtained replication data provide support for the contention that the tendency, induced by representativeness, to confidently make inferences is only slightly, if at all, determined by factors such as statistical and empirical sophistication, availability of normative criteria, knowledge about the shortcomings of human judgment, and the conditions under which inferences are to be made.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953093606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953093606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223980.1984.9923675

DO - 10.1080/00223980.1984.9923675

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 183

EP - 188

JO - Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

JF - Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

SN - 0022-3980

IS - 2

ER -