The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with compustat data: Implications for finance research

Ashiq Ali, Sandy J Klasa, Eric Yeung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

130 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Industry concentration measures calculated with Compustat data, which cover only the public firms in an industry, are poor proxies for actual industry concentration. These measures have correlations of only 13 with the corresponding U.S. Census measures, which are based on all public and private firms in an industry. Also, only when U.S. Census measures are used is there evidence consistent with theoretical predictions that more-concentrated industries, which should be more oligopolistic, are populated by larger and fewer firms with higher price-cost margins. Further, the significant relations of Compustat-based industry concentration measures with the dependent variables of several important prior studies are not obtained when U.S. Census measures are used. One of the reasons for this occurrence is that Compustat-based measures proxy for industry decline. Overall, our results indicate that product markets research that uses Compustat-based industry concentration measures may lead to incorrect conclusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3839-3871
Number of pages33
JournalReview of Financial Studies
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Industry
Finance
Industry concentration
Census
Public firm
Price-cost margin
Market research
Prediction
Private firms
Product market

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with compustat data : Implications for finance research. / Ali, Ashiq; Klasa, Sandy J; Yeung, Eric.

In: Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 10, 10.2009, p. 3839-3871.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e362eb5eef046dfbdf10314c5adb90f,
title = "The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with compustat data: Implications for finance research",
abstract = "Industry concentration measures calculated with Compustat data, which cover only the public firms in an industry, are poor proxies for actual industry concentration. These measures have correlations of only 13 with the corresponding U.S. Census measures, which are based on all public and private firms in an industry. Also, only when U.S. Census measures are used is there evidence consistent with theoretical predictions that more-concentrated industries, which should be more oligopolistic, are populated by larger and fewer firms with higher price-cost margins. Further, the significant relations of Compustat-based industry concentration measures with the dependent variables of several important prior studies are not obtained when U.S. Census measures are used. One of the reasons for this occurrence is that Compustat-based measures proxy for industry decline. Overall, our results indicate that product markets research that uses Compustat-based industry concentration measures may lead to incorrect conclusions.",
author = "Ashiq Ali and Klasa, {Sandy J} and Eric Yeung",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/rfs/hhn103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "3839--3871",
journal = "Review of Financial Studies",
issn = "0893-9454",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with compustat data

T2 - Implications for finance research

AU - Ali, Ashiq

AU - Klasa, Sandy J

AU - Yeung, Eric

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Industry concentration measures calculated with Compustat data, which cover only the public firms in an industry, are poor proxies for actual industry concentration. These measures have correlations of only 13 with the corresponding U.S. Census measures, which are based on all public and private firms in an industry. Also, only when U.S. Census measures are used is there evidence consistent with theoretical predictions that more-concentrated industries, which should be more oligopolistic, are populated by larger and fewer firms with higher price-cost margins. Further, the significant relations of Compustat-based industry concentration measures with the dependent variables of several important prior studies are not obtained when U.S. Census measures are used. One of the reasons for this occurrence is that Compustat-based measures proxy for industry decline. Overall, our results indicate that product markets research that uses Compustat-based industry concentration measures may lead to incorrect conclusions.

AB - Industry concentration measures calculated with Compustat data, which cover only the public firms in an industry, are poor proxies for actual industry concentration. These measures have correlations of only 13 with the corresponding U.S. Census measures, which are based on all public and private firms in an industry. Also, only when U.S. Census measures are used is there evidence consistent with theoretical predictions that more-concentrated industries, which should be more oligopolistic, are populated by larger and fewer firms with higher price-cost margins. Further, the significant relations of Compustat-based industry concentration measures with the dependent variables of several important prior studies are not obtained when U.S. Census measures are used. One of the reasons for this occurrence is that Compustat-based measures proxy for industry decline. Overall, our results indicate that product markets research that uses Compustat-based industry concentration measures may lead to incorrect conclusions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349467903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349467903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rfs/hhn103

DO - 10.1093/rfs/hhn103

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349467903

VL - 22

SP - 3839

EP - 3871

JO - Review of Financial Studies

JF - Review of Financial Studies

SN - 0893-9454

IS - 10

ER -