The misclassification of blinks as saccades: Implications for investigations of eye movement dysfunction in schizophrenia

Monica E. Calkins, Joanna Katsanis, Micah A. Hammer, William G. Iacono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is important to have a simple, accurate method for recording eye movements. Of the two popular approaches commonly adopted, electro-oculography (EOG) and infrared oculography (IROG), IROG is often accepted as the more accurate, and it is the method that is currently used most frequently to examine eye movements in schizophrenia. This study investigated whether the misclassification of blinks as saccades affects saccade rates when the presence of a blink is determined using only IROG recordings of eye position. Both vertical electro-oculography (VEOG), which can be used to objectively identify blinks, and IROG were recorded while 17 schizophrenia patients and 19 healthy controls were presented with sinusoidal stimuli. Of the blinks identified with the VEOG for the total group of participants, a substantial number (37%) were misclassified as catch-up and anticipatory saccades when only the IROG was used. Furthermore, in the schizophrenia group, but not in the healthy control group, the use of the IROG led to a significant misclassification of blinks as anticipatory saccades. Therefore, when IROG alone is used to identify blinks, the misclassification of blinks as saccades is likely to introduce measurement error into estimates of saccade rates, particularly estimates of anticipatory saccade rates in schizophrenia patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)761-767
Number of pages7
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Saccades
Eye Movements
Schizophrenia
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Blink identification
  • Eye movement dysfunction
  • Eye movement methodology
  • Infrared oculography
  • Schizophrenia
  • Vertical electro-oculography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The misclassification of blinks as saccades : Implications for investigations of eye movement dysfunction in schizophrenia. / Calkins, Monica E.; Katsanis, Joanna; Hammer, Micah A.; Iacono, William G.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2001, p. 761-767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8274a0a7d6b74638b5abd637b29895e7,
title = "The misclassification of blinks as saccades: Implications for investigations of eye movement dysfunction in schizophrenia",
abstract = "It is important to have a simple, accurate method for recording eye movements. Of the two popular approaches commonly adopted, electro-oculography (EOG) and infrared oculography (IROG), IROG is often accepted as the more accurate, and it is the method that is currently used most frequently to examine eye movements in schizophrenia. This study investigated whether the misclassification of blinks as saccades affects saccade rates when the presence of a blink is determined using only IROG recordings of eye position. Both vertical electro-oculography (VEOG), which can be used to objectively identify blinks, and IROG were recorded while 17 schizophrenia patients and 19 healthy controls were presented with sinusoidal stimuli. Of the blinks identified with the VEOG for the total group of participants, a substantial number (37{\%}) were misclassified as catch-up and anticipatory saccades when only the IROG was used. Furthermore, in the schizophrenia group, but not in the healthy control group, the use of the IROG led to a significant misclassification of blinks as anticipatory saccades. Therefore, when IROG alone is used to identify blinks, the misclassification of blinks as saccades is likely to introduce measurement error into estimates of saccade rates, particularly estimates of anticipatory saccade rates in schizophrenia patients.",
keywords = "Blink identification, Eye movement dysfunction, Eye movement methodology, Infrared oculography, Schizophrenia, Vertical electro-oculography",
author = "Calkins, {Monica E.} and Joanna Katsanis and Hammer, {Micah A.} and Iacono, {William G.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1017/S0048577201991930",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "761--767",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The misclassification of blinks as saccades

T2 - Implications for investigations of eye movement dysfunction in schizophrenia

AU - Calkins, Monica E.

AU - Katsanis, Joanna

AU - Hammer, Micah A.

AU - Iacono, William G.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - It is important to have a simple, accurate method for recording eye movements. Of the two popular approaches commonly adopted, electro-oculography (EOG) and infrared oculography (IROG), IROG is often accepted as the more accurate, and it is the method that is currently used most frequently to examine eye movements in schizophrenia. This study investigated whether the misclassification of blinks as saccades affects saccade rates when the presence of a blink is determined using only IROG recordings of eye position. Both vertical electro-oculography (VEOG), which can be used to objectively identify blinks, and IROG were recorded while 17 schizophrenia patients and 19 healthy controls were presented with sinusoidal stimuli. Of the blinks identified with the VEOG for the total group of participants, a substantial number (37%) were misclassified as catch-up and anticipatory saccades when only the IROG was used. Furthermore, in the schizophrenia group, but not in the healthy control group, the use of the IROG led to a significant misclassification of blinks as anticipatory saccades. Therefore, when IROG alone is used to identify blinks, the misclassification of blinks as saccades is likely to introduce measurement error into estimates of saccade rates, particularly estimates of anticipatory saccade rates in schizophrenia patients.

AB - It is important to have a simple, accurate method for recording eye movements. Of the two popular approaches commonly adopted, electro-oculography (EOG) and infrared oculography (IROG), IROG is often accepted as the more accurate, and it is the method that is currently used most frequently to examine eye movements in schizophrenia. This study investigated whether the misclassification of blinks as saccades affects saccade rates when the presence of a blink is determined using only IROG recordings of eye position. Both vertical electro-oculography (VEOG), which can be used to objectively identify blinks, and IROG were recorded while 17 schizophrenia patients and 19 healthy controls were presented with sinusoidal stimuli. Of the blinks identified with the VEOG for the total group of participants, a substantial number (37%) were misclassified as catch-up and anticipatory saccades when only the IROG was used. Furthermore, in the schizophrenia group, but not in the healthy control group, the use of the IROG led to a significant misclassification of blinks as anticipatory saccades. Therefore, when IROG alone is used to identify blinks, the misclassification of blinks as saccades is likely to introduce measurement error into estimates of saccade rates, particularly estimates of anticipatory saccade rates in schizophrenia patients.

KW - Blink identification

KW - Eye movement dysfunction

KW - Eye movement methodology

KW - Infrared oculography

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Vertical electro-oculography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034849027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034849027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0048577201991930

DO - 10.1017/S0048577201991930

M3 - Article

C2 - 11577899

AN - SCOPUS:0034849027

VL - 38

SP - 761

EP - 767

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 5

ER -