The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research

Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Nathan P Podsakoff, Jeong Yeon Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

167 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential problems caused by measurement model misspecification in the field of leadership. First, we discuss the conceptual differences between the four types of measurement models that have been used in leadership research and provide a set of criteria that could be used to decide upon the appropriate model. Following this, we examine the extent of measurement model misspecification by conducting a review of the leadership literature and applying these criteria. Next, we discuss the potential consequences of measurement model misspecification on conclusions made about the structural relationships between constructs. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for leadership research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-656
Number of pages42
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

leadership
Research
Measurement model
Model misspecification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. / Podsakoff, Philip M.; MacKenzie, Scott B.; Podsakoff, Nathan P; Lee, Jeong Yeon.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 6, 12.2003, p. 615-656.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Podsakoff, Philip M. ; MacKenzie, Scott B. ; Podsakoff, Nathan P ; Lee, Jeong Yeon. / The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. In: Leadership Quarterly. 2003 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 615-656.
@article{a6927376e45e4a2284f651de30f4acda,
title = "The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research",
abstract = "The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential problems caused by measurement model misspecification in the field of leadership. First, we discuss the conceptual differences between the four types of measurement models that have been used in leadership research and provide a set of criteria that could be used to decide upon the appropriate model. Following this, we examine the extent of measurement model misspecification by conducting a review of the leadership literature and applying these criteria. Next, we discuss the potential consequences of measurement model misspecification on conclusions made about the structural relationships between constructs. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for leadership research.",
author = "Podsakoff, {Philip M.} and MacKenzie, {Scott B.} and Podsakoff, {Nathan P} and Lee, {Jeong Yeon}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "615--656",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research

AU - Podsakoff, Philip M.

AU - MacKenzie, Scott B.

AU - Podsakoff, Nathan P

AU - Lee, Jeong Yeon

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential problems caused by measurement model misspecification in the field of leadership. First, we discuss the conceptual differences between the four types of measurement models that have been used in leadership research and provide a set of criteria that could be used to decide upon the appropriate model. Following this, we examine the extent of measurement model misspecification by conducting a review of the leadership literature and applying these criteria. Next, we discuss the potential consequences of measurement model misspecification on conclusions made about the structural relationships between constructs. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for leadership research.

AB - The purpose of the present review is to examine the potential problems caused by measurement model misspecification in the field of leadership. First, we discuss the conceptual differences between the four types of measurement models that have been used in leadership research and provide a set of criteria that could be used to decide upon the appropriate model. Following this, we examine the extent of measurement model misspecification by conducting a review of the leadership literature and applying these criteria. Next, we discuss the potential consequences of measurement model misspecification on conclusions made about the structural relationships between constructs. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for leadership research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344118812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344118812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 615

EP - 656

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 6

ER -