The National Children's Study: Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach

Laura L. Blaisdell, Jennifer A. Zellner, Allison A. King, Elaine Faustman, Mari S Wilhelm, Mark L. Hudak, Robert D. Annett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S219-S230
JournalPediatrics
Volume137
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Community-Institutional Relations
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Personnel Selection
Demography
Health Expenditures
Pregnant Women
Social Participation
Social Media
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Blaisdell, L. L., Zellner, J. A., King, A. A., Faustman, E., Wilhelm, M. S., Hudak, M. L., & Annett, R. D. (2016). The National Children's Study: Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach. Pediatrics, 137, S219-S230. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4410C

The National Children's Study : Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach. / Blaisdell, Laura L.; Zellner, Jennifer A.; King, Allison A.; Faustman, Elaine; Wilhelm, Mari S; Hudak, Mark L.; Annett, Robert D.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 137, 01.06.2016, p. S219-S230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blaisdell, LL, Zellner, JA, King, AA, Faustman, E, Wilhelm, MS, Hudak, ML & Annett, RD 2016, 'The National Children's Study: Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach', Pediatrics, vol. 137, pp. S219-S230. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4410C
Blaisdell, Laura L. ; Zellner, Jennifer A. ; King, Allison A. ; Faustman, Elaine ; Wilhelm, Mari S ; Hudak, Mark L. ; Annett, Robert D. / The National Children's Study : Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach. In: Pediatrics. 2016 ; Vol. 137. pp. S219-S230.
@article{e2e6fe5a26fd475b94d861ddc7b1e65d,
title = "The National Children's Study: Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.",
author = "Blaisdell, {Laura L.} and Zellner, {Jennifer A.} and King, {Allison A.} and Elaine Faustman and Wilhelm, {Mari S} and Hudak, {Mark L.} and Annett, {Robert D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2015-4410C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "S219--S230",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The National Children's Study

T2 - Recruitment outcomes using an enhanced household-based approach

AU - Blaisdell, Laura L.

AU - Zellner, Jennifer A.

AU - King, Allison A.

AU - Faustman, Elaine

AU - Wilhelm, Mari S

AU - Hudak, Mark L.

AU - Annett, Robert D.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Ten National Children's Study (NCS) study locations with diverse demographic characteristics used an enhanced household-based recruitment (EHBR) approach to enroll preconceptional and pregnant women. Study centers used different types and dosages of community outreach and engagement (COE) activities and supplemental strategies. The goal of the study was to determine whether variability in enumeration and recruitment outcomes correlated with study location characteristics or types and dosages of COE activities (number of COE events, number of advance household mailings, total media expenditures, and total COE expenditures). METHODS: Each of the sites provided data on COE activities, protocol implementation, supplemental recruitment activities, location demographic characteristics, and enumeration/recruitment outcomes. RESULTS: COE activities varied across sites in breadth and scope. Numerous strategies were used, including media advertising, social media, participation in community-wide events, presentations to stakeholders, and creation of advisory boards. Some sites included supplemental recruitment efforts. EHBR sites enrolled 1404 women at the initial pregnancy screening. No significant relationships were found between study location demographic characteristics or between the types and dosages of COE activities and recruitment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Probability sampling for a long-term study requires a positive image with stakeholders and within communities; this requirement may be especially true for door-to-door recruitment. EHBR sites successfully recruited a representative sample of preconceptional and pregnant women. Sites reported implementing similar COE activities but with varying dosage and cost; however, analyses did not support a benefit of COE strategies on study recruitment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973360019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973360019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2015-4410C

DO - 10.1542/peds.2015-4410C

M3 - Article

C2 - 27251868

AN - SCOPUS:84973360019

VL - 137

SP - S219-S230

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

ER -