The new site of activism: on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making

Jennifer Suzanne Earl, Alan Schussman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most research on social movements and the Internet has focused on pre-existing movements which have recently adopted on-line tactics. This body of research has applied classic social movement theories to such movements, focusing on the faster communication, broader reach, and the expanded mobilization capacity facilitated by the Internet for pre-existing movements. Using the on-line strategic voting movement during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election as a case study, we argue that the application of prior theory often overlooks the ways in which movements that emerge and thrive on-line function differently from conventional movements. Specifically, we argue that movement entrepreneurs, instead of social movement organizations, were largely responsible for organizing the strategic voting movement. This more entrepreneurial movement infrastructure brought with it changes in decision making processes and concerns. Decision making became more discretionary, the importance of leadership declined, decisions about organizational form became less problematic, and ideological and Internet-related concerns informed decision making in lieu of organizational or more standard social movement concerns. However, we argue that e-movements, and the strategic voting movement in particular, are not so exotic that they constitute fundamentally new forms of action; instead, such movements are still usefully thought of as social movements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
Pages155-187
Number of pages33
Volume24
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameResearch in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
Volume24
ISSN (Print)0163786X

Fingerprint

social movement
entrepreneur
voting
decision making
Internet
Social Movements
decision making process
presidential election
tactics
mobilization
leadership
infrastructure
communication
election

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Earl, J. S., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change (Vol. 24, pp. 155-187). (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change; Vol. 24).

The new site of activism : on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. / Earl, Jennifer Suzanne; Schussman, Alan.

Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 24 2003. p. 155-187 (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change; Vol. 24).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Earl, JS & Schussman, A 2003, The new site of activism: on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. in Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. vol. 24, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 24, pp. 155-187.
Earl JS, Schussman A. The new site of activism: on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. In Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 24. 2003. p. 155-187. (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change).
Earl, Jennifer Suzanne ; Schussman, Alan. / The new site of activism : on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 24 2003. pp. 155-187 (Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change).
@inbook{624eed5d2fe6449f8b2823c425c5b908,
title = "The new site of activism: on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making",
abstract = "Most research on social movements and the Internet has focused on pre-existing movements which have recently adopted on-line tactics. This body of research has applied classic social movement theories to such movements, focusing on the faster communication, broader reach, and the expanded mobilization capacity facilitated by the Internet for pre-existing movements. Using the on-line strategic voting movement during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election as a case study, we argue that the application of prior theory often overlooks the ways in which movements that emerge and thrive on-line function differently from conventional movements. Specifically, we argue that movement entrepreneurs, instead of social movement organizations, were largely responsible for organizing the strategic voting movement. This more entrepreneurial movement infrastructure brought with it changes in decision making processes and concerns. Decision making became more discretionary, the importance of leadership declined, decisions about organizational form became less problematic, and ideological and Internet-related concerns informed decision making in lieu of organizational or more standard social movement concerns. However, we argue that e-movements, and the strategic voting movement in particular, are not so exotic that they constitute fundamentally new forms of action; instead, such movements are still usefully thought of as social movements.",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne} and Alan Schussman",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0762307870",
volume = "24",
series = "Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change",
pages = "155--187",
booktitle = "Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The new site of activism

T2 - on-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

AU - Schussman, Alan

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Most research on social movements and the Internet has focused on pre-existing movements which have recently adopted on-line tactics. This body of research has applied classic social movement theories to such movements, focusing on the faster communication, broader reach, and the expanded mobilization capacity facilitated by the Internet for pre-existing movements. Using the on-line strategic voting movement during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election as a case study, we argue that the application of prior theory often overlooks the ways in which movements that emerge and thrive on-line function differently from conventional movements. Specifically, we argue that movement entrepreneurs, instead of social movement organizations, were largely responsible for organizing the strategic voting movement. This more entrepreneurial movement infrastructure brought with it changes in decision making processes and concerns. Decision making became more discretionary, the importance of leadership declined, decisions about organizational form became less problematic, and ideological and Internet-related concerns informed decision making in lieu of organizational or more standard social movement concerns. However, we argue that e-movements, and the strategic voting movement in particular, are not so exotic that they constitute fundamentally new forms of action; instead, such movements are still usefully thought of as social movements.

AB - Most research on social movements and the Internet has focused on pre-existing movements which have recently adopted on-line tactics. This body of research has applied classic social movement theories to such movements, focusing on the faster communication, broader reach, and the expanded mobilization capacity facilitated by the Internet for pre-existing movements. Using the on-line strategic voting movement during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election as a case study, we argue that the application of prior theory often overlooks the ways in which movements that emerge and thrive on-line function differently from conventional movements. Specifically, we argue that movement entrepreneurs, instead of social movement organizations, were largely responsible for organizing the strategic voting movement. This more entrepreneurial movement infrastructure brought with it changes in decision making processes and concerns. Decision making became more discretionary, the importance of leadership declined, decisions about organizational form became less problematic, and ideological and Internet-related concerns informed decision making in lieu of organizational or more standard social movement concerns. However, we argue that e-movements, and the strategic voting movement in particular, are not so exotic that they constitute fundamentally new forms of action; instead, such movements are still usefully thought of as social movements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8644281122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8644281122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:8644281122

SN - 0762307870

SN - 9780762307876

VL - 24

T3 - Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change

SP - 155

EP - 187

BT - Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change

ER -