The OTA open fracture classification: A study of reliability and agreement

Julie Agel, Andrew R. Evans, John Lawrence Marsh, Thomas A. Decoster, Douglas W. Lundy, James F. Kellam, Clifford B. Jones, Gregory L Desilva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Open Fracture Classification. DESIGN: Video-based reliability study. SETTING: Orthopedic meetings and grand rounds. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic surgeons. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability assessment classification. RESULTS: The results demonstrate the system to have high reliability and much improvement compared with published Gustilo-Anderson classification reliability studies. Overall interrater reliability (κ) values were highest for arterial injury, with near perfect agreement across all raters and within each value. Skin injury, bone loss, and contamination demonstrated moderate to substantial levels of agreement. Muscle injury had the most disagreement between raters but still demonstrating a fair level of interrater agreement, which is a level of agreement superior to the literature related to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Levels of agreement were similar between attending surgeons and residents for all categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study, which included a diverse multicenter multinational cohort of orthopaedic surgeons and residents, of the OTA Open Fracture Classification demonstrated moderate to excellent interobserver reliability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-384
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Open Fractures
Orthopedics
Wounds and Injuries
Teaching Rounds
Bone and Bones
Muscles
Skin

Keywords

  • interrater reliability
  • OTA open fracture classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The OTA open fracture classification : A study of reliability and agreement. / Agel, Julie; Evans, Andrew R.; Marsh, John Lawrence; Decoster, Thomas A.; Lundy, Douglas W.; Kellam, James F.; Jones, Clifford B.; Desilva, Gregory L.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 27, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 379-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agel, J, Evans, AR, Marsh, JL, Decoster, TA, Lundy, DW, Kellam, JF, Jones, CB & Desilva, GL 2013, 'The OTA open fracture classification: A study of reliability and agreement', Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182820d31
Agel, Julie ; Evans, Andrew R. ; Marsh, John Lawrence ; Decoster, Thomas A. ; Lundy, Douglas W. ; Kellam, James F. ; Jones, Clifford B. ; Desilva, Gregory L. / The OTA open fracture classification : A study of reliability and agreement. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 7. pp. 379-384.
@article{1a99b122b5d44ccdabd4fc83b4a18e7f,
title = "The OTA open fracture classification: A study of reliability and agreement",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Open Fracture Classification. DESIGN: Video-based reliability study. SETTING: Orthopedic meetings and grand rounds. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic surgeons. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability assessment classification. RESULTS: The results demonstrate the system to have high reliability and much improvement compared with published Gustilo-Anderson classification reliability studies. Overall interrater reliability (κ) values were highest for arterial injury, with near perfect agreement across all raters and within each value. Skin injury, bone loss, and contamination demonstrated moderate to substantial levels of agreement. Muscle injury had the most disagreement between raters but still demonstrating a fair level of interrater agreement, which is a level of agreement superior to the literature related to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Levels of agreement were similar between attending surgeons and residents for all categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study, which included a diverse multicenter multinational cohort of orthopaedic surgeons and residents, of the OTA Open Fracture Classification demonstrated moderate to excellent interobserver reliability.",
keywords = "interrater reliability, OTA open fracture classification",
author = "Julie Agel and Evans, {Andrew R.} and Marsh, {John Lawrence} and Decoster, {Thomas A.} and Lundy, {Douglas W.} and Kellam, {James F.} and Jones, {Clifford B.} and Desilva, {Gregory L}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182820d31",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "379--384",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The OTA open fracture classification

T2 - A study of reliability and agreement

AU - Agel, Julie

AU - Evans, Andrew R.

AU - Marsh, John Lawrence

AU - Decoster, Thomas A.

AU - Lundy, Douglas W.

AU - Kellam, James F.

AU - Jones, Clifford B.

AU - Desilva, Gregory L

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Open Fracture Classification. DESIGN: Video-based reliability study. SETTING: Orthopedic meetings and grand rounds. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic surgeons. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability assessment classification. RESULTS: The results demonstrate the system to have high reliability and much improvement compared with published Gustilo-Anderson classification reliability studies. Overall interrater reliability (κ) values were highest for arterial injury, with near perfect agreement across all raters and within each value. Skin injury, bone loss, and contamination demonstrated moderate to substantial levels of agreement. Muscle injury had the most disagreement between raters but still demonstrating a fair level of interrater agreement, which is a level of agreement superior to the literature related to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Levels of agreement were similar between attending surgeons and residents for all categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study, which included a diverse multicenter multinational cohort of orthopaedic surgeons and residents, of the OTA Open Fracture Classification demonstrated moderate to excellent interobserver reliability.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Open Fracture Classification. DESIGN: Video-based reliability study. SETTING: Orthopedic meetings and grand rounds. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopedic surgeons. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability assessment classification. RESULTS: The results demonstrate the system to have high reliability and much improvement compared with published Gustilo-Anderson classification reliability studies. Overall interrater reliability (κ) values were highest for arterial injury, with near perfect agreement across all raters and within each value. Skin injury, bone loss, and contamination demonstrated moderate to substantial levels of agreement. Muscle injury had the most disagreement between raters but still demonstrating a fair level of interrater agreement, which is a level of agreement superior to the literature related to the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Levels of agreement were similar between attending surgeons and residents for all categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study, which included a diverse multicenter multinational cohort of orthopaedic surgeons and residents, of the OTA Open Fracture Classification demonstrated moderate to excellent interobserver reliability.

KW - interrater reliability

KW - OTA open fracture classification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880141324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880141324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182820d31

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182820d31

M3 - Article

C2 - 23287764

AN - SCOPUS:84880141324

VL - 27

SP - 379

EP - 384

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 7

ER -