The people’s right to know: Comparing Harold L. Cross’ pre-FOIA world to post-FOIA today

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Journalists and politicians often disagree over whether the state of freedom of information is better or worse since the passage of the Freedom of Information Act in 1966. This study attempts to provide some historical context by comparing the state of access in 1953 as outlined in detail in The People’s Right to Know by Harold L. Cross, the first comprehensive review of case law and statutes in the United States regarding access to public records at local, state and federal agencies. Analysis indicates that the legal right to information, particularly for police records and federal documents, is better today than it was in 1953, but challenges persist regarding compliance, enforcement and the prevalence of exemptions. Recommendations are provided for the next fifty years, including renewal of Cross’ urging for a First Amendment right to know.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-463
Number of pages31
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

freedom of information
Law enforcement
right to information
exemption
case law
journalist
statute
amendment
politician
police
act
Compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Law

Cite this

The people’s right to know : Comparing Harold L. Cross’ pre-FOIA world to post-FOIA today. / Cuillier, David L.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 433-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25e93c27f7504558b79f91a77d616044,
title = "The people’s right to know: Comparing Harold L. Cross’ pre-FOIA world to post-FOIA today",
abstract = "Journalists and politicians often disagree over whether the state of freedom of information is better or worse since the passage of the Freedom of Information Act in 1966. This study attempts to provide some historical context by comparing the state of access in 1953 as outlined in detail in The People’s Right to Know by Harold L. Cross, the first comprehensive review of case law and statutes in the United States regarding access to public records at local, state and federal agencies. Analysis indicates that the legal right to information, particularly for police records and federal documents, is better today than it was in 1953, but challenges persist regarding compliance, enforcement and the prevalence of exemptions. Recommendations are provided for the next fifty years, including renewal of Cross’ urging for a First Amendment right to know.",
author = "Cuillier, {David L}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2016.1216678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "433--463",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The people’s right to know

T2 - Comparing Harold L. Cross’ pre-FOIA world to post-FOIA today

AU - Cuillier, David L

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Journalists and politicians often disagree over whether the state of freedom of information is better or worse since the passage of the Freedom of Information Act in 1966. This study attempts to provide some historical context by comparing the state of access in 1953 as outlined in detail in The People’s Right to Know by Harold L. Cross, the first comprehensive review of case law and statutes in the United States regarding access to public records at local, state and federal agencies. Analysis indicates that the legal right to information, particularly for police records and federal documents, is better today than it was in 1953, but challenges persist regarding compliance, enforcement and the prevalence of exemptions. Recommendations are provided for the next fifty years, including renewal of Cross’ urging for a First Amendment right to know.

AB - Journalists and politicians often disagree over whether the state of freedom of information is better or worse since the passage of the Freedom of Information Act in 1966. This study attempts to provide some historical context by comparing the state of access in 1953 as outlined in detail in The People’s Right to Know by Harold L. Cross, the first comprehensive review of case law and statutes in the United States regarding access to public records at local, state and federal agencies. Analysis indicates that the legal right to information, particularly for police records and federal documents, is better today than it was in 1953, but challenges persist regarding compliance, enforcement and the prevalence of exemptions. Recommendations are provided for the next fifty years, including renewal of Cross’ urging for a First Amendment right to know.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988647275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988647275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2016.1216678

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2016.1216678

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988647275

VL - 21

SP - 433

EP - 463

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 4

ER -