The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite their long trajectory in the social sciences, few systematic works analyze how often and for what purposes focus groups appear in published works. This study fills this gap by undertaking a meta-analysis of focus group use over the last 10 years. It makes several contributions to our understanding of when and why focus groups are used in the social sciences. First, the study explains that focus groups generate data at three units of analysis, namely, the individual, the group, and the interaction. Although most researchers rely upon the individual unit of analysis, the method’s comparative advantage lies in the group and interactive units. Second, it reveals strong affinities between each unit of analysis and the primary motivation for using focus groups as a data collection method. The individual unit of analysis is appropriate for triangulation; the group unit is appropriate as a pretest; and the interactive unit is appropriate for exploration. Finally, it offers a set of guidelines that researchers should adopt when presenting focus groups as part of their research design. Researchers should, first, state the main purpose of the focus group in a research design; second, identify the primary unit of analysis exploited; and finally, list the questions used to collect data in the focus group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-259
Number of pages29
JournalSociological Methods and Research
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

data collection method
Group
research planning
social science
triangulation

Keywords

  • focus groups
  • mixed methods
  • qualitative methods
  • research transparency
  • social sciences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method. / Cyr, Jennifer M.

In: Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2014, p. 231-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8060686e91c4efe8679397926378cca,
title = "The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method",
abstract = "Despite their long trajectory in the social sciences, few systematic works analyze how often and for what purposes focus groups appear in published works. This study fills this gap by undertaking a meta-analysis of focus group use over the last 10 years. It makes several contributions to our understanding of when and why focus groups are used in the social sciences. First, the study explains that focus groups generate data at three units of analysis, namely, the individual, the group, and the interaction. Although most researchers rely upon the individual unit of analysis, the method’s comparative advantage lies in the group and interactive units. Second, it reveals strong affinities between each unit of analysis and the primary motivation for using focus groups as a data collection method. The individual unit of analysis is appropriate for triangulation; the group unit is appropriate as a pretest; and the interactive unit is appropriate for exploration. Finally, it offers a set of guidelines that researchers should adopt when presenting focus groups as part of their research design. Researchers should, first, state the main purpose of the focus group in a research design; second, identify the primary unit of analysis exploited; and finally, list the questions used to collect data in the focus group.",
keywords = "focus groups, mixed methods, qualitative methods, research transparency, social sciences",
author = "Cyr, {Jennifer M}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0049124115570065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "231--259",
journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
issn = "0049-1241",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method

AU - Cyr, Jennifer M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite their long trajectory in the social sciences, few systematic works analyze how often and for what purposes focus groups appear in published works. This study fills this gap by undertaking a meta-analysis of focus group use over the last 10 years. It makes several contributions to our understanding of when and why focus groups are used in the social sciences. First, the study explains that focus groups generate data at three units of analysis, namely, the individual, the group, and the interaction. Although most researchers rely upon the individual unit of analysis, the method’s comparative advantage lies in the group and interactive units. Second, it reveals strong affinities between each unit of analysis and the primary motivation for using focus groups as a data collection method. The individual unit of analysis is appropriate for triangulation; the group unit is appropriate as a pretest; and the interactive unit is appropriate for exploration. Finally, it offers a set of guidelines that researchers should adopt when presenting focus groups as part of their research design. Researchers should, first, state the main purpose of the focus group in a research design; second, identify the primary unit of analysis exploited; and finally, list the questions used to collect data in the focus group.

AB - Despite their long trajectory in the social sciences, few systematic works analyze how often and for what purposes focus groups appear in published works. This study fills this gap by undertaking a meta-analysis of focus group use over the last 10 years. It makes several contributions to our understanding of when and why focus groups are used in the social sciences. First, the study explains that focus groups generate data at three units of analysis, namely, the individual, the group, and the interaction. Although most researchers rely upon the individual unit of analysis, the method’s comparative advantage lies in the group and interactive units. Second, it reveals strong affinities between each unit of analysis and the primary motivation for using focus groups as a data collection method. The individual unit of analysis is appropriate for triangulation; the group unit is appropriate as a pretest; and the interactive unit is appropriate for exploration. Finally, it offers a set of guidelines that researchers should adopt when presenting focus groups as part of their research design. Researchers should, first, state the main purpose of the focus group in a research design; second, identify the primary unit of analysis exploited; and finally, list the questions used to collect data in the focus group.

KW - focus groups

KW - mixed methods

KW - qualitative methods

KW - research transparency

KW - social sciences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963713708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963713708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0049124115570065

DO - 10.1177/0049124115570065

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963713708

VL - 45

SP - 231

EP - 259

JO - Sociological Methods and Research

JF - Sociological Methods and Research

SN - 0049-1241

IS - 2

ER -