The political economy of American Indian gaming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, the commercial gaming industry has grown rapidly on American Indian reservations. Today, more than 200 Indian nations own more than 400 gaming operations in 28 states, yielding revenues in 2006 of more than $25 billion. How did this come about and what are the effects on Indian nations and on non-Native communities? The organization of contemporary Indian gaming operations has its roots in tribal-state conflicts dating to the late 1970s. It is a governmental activity, carried out by tribal governments on the basis of the preexisting rights of Indian nations, although it has been substantially constrained by congressional legislation and federal court decisions. While gaming's effects are unevenly distributed across tribes, its political, economic, and social impacts on many Indian reservations have been significant and positive, and it has had positive economic effects on many non-Native communities as well, particularly in distressed areas. But our understandingof gaming's effects is hindered by a lackof comprehensive case studies of gaming-related tribal decision making and of gaming's effects on both Native and non-Native communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-82
Number of pages20
JournalAnnual Review of Law and Social Science
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

American Indian
political economy
community
political impact
court decision
economic impact
social effects
revenue
ethnic group
legislation
decision making
organization
industry
economics

Keywords

  • Economic development
  • Gambling
  • Tribal sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The political economy of American Indian gaming. / Cornell, Stephen E.

In: Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 4, 2008, p. 63-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83440f2598a24fc68185a75399aa248f,
title = "The political economy of American Indian gaming",
abstract = "Since the late 1980s, the commercial gaming industry has grown rapidly on American Indian reservations. Today, more than 200 Indian nations own more than 400 gaming operations in 28 states, yielding revenues in 2006 of more than $25 billion. How did this come about and what are the effects on Indian nations and on non-Native communities? The organization of contemporary Indian gaming operations has its roots in tribal-state conflicts dating to the late 1970s. It is a governmental activity, carried out by tribal governments on the basis of the preexisting rights of Indian nations, although it has been substantially constrained by congressional legislation and federal court decisions. While gaming's effects are unevenly distributed across tribes, its political, economic, and social impacts on many Indian reservations have been significant and positive, and it has had positive economic effects on many non-Native communities as well, particularly in distressed areas. But our understandingof gaming's effects is hindered by a lackof comprehensive case studies of gaming-related tribal decision making and of gaming's effects on both Native and non-Native communities.",
keywords = "Economic development, Gambling, Tribal sovereignty",
author = "Cornell, {Stephen E}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "63--82",
journal = "Annual Review of Law and Social Science",
issn = "1550-3585",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political economy of American Indian gaming

AU - Cornell, Stephen E

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Since the late 1980s, the commercial gaming industry has grown rapidly on American Indian reservations. Today, more than 200 Indian nations own more than 400 gaming operations in 28 states, yielding revenues in 2006 of more than $25 billion. How did this come about and what are the effects on Indian nations and on non-Native communities? The organization of contemporary Indian gaming operations has its roots in tribal-state conflicts dating to the late 1970s. It is a governmental activity, carried out by tribal governments on the basis of the preexisting rights of Indian nations, although it has been substantially constrained by congressional legislation and federal court decisions. While gaming's effects are unevenly distributed across tribes, its political, economic, and social impacts on many Indian reservations have been significant and positive, and it has had positive economic effects on many non-Native communities as well, particularly in distressed areas. But our understandingof gaming's effects is hindered by a lackof comprehensive case studies of gaming-related tribal decision making and of gaming's effects on both Native and non-Native communities.

AB - Since the late 1980s, the commercial gaming industry has grown rapidly on American Indian reservations. Today, more than 200 Indian nations own more than 400 gaming operations in 28 states, yielding revenues in 2006 of more than $25 billion. How did this come about and what are the effects on Indian nations and on non-Native communities? The organization of contemporary Indian gaming operations has its roots in tribal-state conflicts dating to the late 1970s. It is a governmental activity, carried out by tribal governments on the basis of the preexisting rights of Indian nations, although it has been substantially constrained by congressional legislation and federal court decisions. While gaming's effects are unevenly distributed across tribes, its political, economic, and social impacts on many Indian reservations have been significant and positive, and it has had positive economic effects on many non-Native communities as well, particularly in distressed areas. But our understandingof gaming's effects is hindered by a lackof comprehensive case studies of gaming-related tribal decision making and of gaming's effects on both Native and non-Native communities.

KW - Economic development

KW - Gambling

KW - Tribal sovereignty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57649223711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57649223711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172343

DO - 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57649223711

VL - 4

SP - 63

EP - 82

JO - Annual Review of Law and Social Science

JF - Annual Review of Law and Social Science

SN - 1550-3585

ER -