The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology

V. M. Savage, J. F. Gillooly, W. H. Woodruff, G. B. West, A. P. Allen, Brian Enquist, J. H. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

416 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Recent studies have resurrected the debate over the value for the allometric scaling exponent that relates whole-organism metabolic rate to body size. Is it 3/4 or 2/3? This question has been raised before and resolved in favour of 3/4. Like previous ones, recent claims for a value of 2/3 are based almost entirely on basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals. 2. Here we compile and analyse a new, larger data set for mammalian BMR. We show that interspecific variation in BMR, as well as field metabolic rates of mammals, and basal or standard metabolic rates for many other organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists and plants, all scale with exponents whose confidence intervals include 3/4 and exclude 2/3. Our analysis of maximal metabolic rate gives a slope that is greater than and confidence intervals that exclude both 3/4 and 2/3. 3. Additionally, numerous other physiological rates that are closely tied to metabolism in a wide variety of organisms, including heart and respiratory rates in mammals, scale as M-1/4. 4. The fact that quarter-power allometric scaling is so pervasive in biology suggests that different allometric relations have a common, mechanistic origin and provides an empirical basis for theoretical models that derive these scaling exponents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-282
Number of pages26
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

basal metabolic rate
mammals
Biological Sciences
confidence interval
organisms
respiratory rate
interspecific variation
heart rate
mammal
body size
invertebrates
vertebrates
metabolism
rate
protist
vertebrate
invertebrate

Keywords

  • Body size
  • Metabolic rates
  • Physiological times
  • Quarter-power scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Savage, V. M., Gillooly, J. F., Woodruff, W. H., West, G. B., Allen, A. P., Enquist, B., & Brown, J. H. (2004). The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. Functional Ecology, 18(2), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x

The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. / Savage, V. M.; Gillooly, J. F.; Woodruff, W. H.; West, G. B.; Allen, A. P.; Enquist, Brian; Brown, J. H.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 257-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savage, VM, Gillooly, JF, Woodruff, WH, West, GB, Allen, AP, Enquist, B & Brown, JH 2004, 'The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology', Functional Ecology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x
Savage VM, Gillooly JF, Woodruff WH, West GB, Allen AP, Enquist B et al. The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. Functional Ecology. 2004 Apr;18(2):257-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x
Savage, V. M. ; Gillooly, J. F. ; Woodruff, W. H. ; West, G. B. ; Allen, A. P. ; Enquist, Brian ; Brown, J. H. / The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. In: Functional Ecology. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 257-282.
@article{29e974546be14852975f73ef69b4bc4a,
title = "The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology",
abstract = "1. Recent studies have resurrected the debate over the value for the allometric scaling exponent that relates whole-organism metabolic rate to body size. Is it 3/4 or 2/3? This question has been raised before and resolved in favour of 3/4. Like previous ones, recent claims for a value of 2/3 are based almost entirely on basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals. 2. Here we compile and analyse a new, larger data set for mammalian BMR. We show that interspecific variation in BMR, as well as field metabolic rates of mammals, and basal or standard metabolic rates for many other organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists and plants, all scale with exponents whose confidence intervals include 3/4 and exclude 2/3. Our analysis of maximal metabolic rate gives a slope that is greater than and confidence intervals that exclude both 3/4 and 2/3. 3. Additionally, numerous other physiological rates that are closely tied to metabolism in a wide variety of organisms, including heart and respiratory rates in mammals, scale as M-1/4. 4. The fact that quarter-power allometric scaling is so pervasive in biology suggests that different allometric relations have a common, mechanistic origin and provides an empirical basis for theoretical models that derive these scaling exponents.",
keywords = "Body size, Metabolic rates, Physiological times, Quarter-power scaling",
author = "Savage, {V. M.} and Gillooly, {J. F.} and Woodruff, {W. H.} and West, {G. B.} and Allen, {A. P.} and Brian Enquist and Brown, {J. H.}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "257--282",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology

AU - Savage, V. M.

AU - Gillooly, J. F.

AU - Woodruff, W. H.

AU - West, G. B.

AU - Allen, A. P.

AU - Enquist, Brian

AU - Brown, J. H.

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - 1. Recent studies have resurrected the debate over the value for the allometric scaling exponent that relates whole-organism metabolic rate to body size. Is it 3/4 or 2/3? This question has been raised before and resolved in favour of 3/4. Like previous ones, recent claims for a value of 2/3 are based almost entirely on basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals. 2. Here we compile and analyse a new, larger data set for mammalian BMR. We show that interspecific variation in BMR, as well as field metabolic rates of mammals, and basal or standard metabolic rates for many other organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists and plants, all scale with exponents whose confidence intervals include 3/4 and exclude 2/3. Our analysis of maximal metabolic rate gives a slope that is greater than and confidence intervals that exclude both 3/4 and 2/3. 3. Additionally, numerous other physiological rates that are closely tied to metabolism in a wide variety of organisms, including heart and respiratory rates in mammals, scale as M-1/4. 4. The fact that quarter-power allometric scaling is so pervasive in biology suggests that different allometric relations have a common, mechanistic origin and provides an empirical basis for theoretical models that derive these scaling exponents.

AB - 1. Recent studies have resurrected the debate over the value for the allometric scaling exponent that relates whole-organism metabolic rate to body size. Is it 3/4 or 2/3? This question has been raised before and resolved in favour of 3/4. Like previous ones, recent claims for a value of 2/3 are based almost entirely on basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals. 2. Here we compile and analyse a new, larger data set for mammalian BMR. We show that interspecific variation in BMR, as well as field metabolic rates of mammals, and basal or standard metabolic rates for many other organisms, including vertebrates, invertebrates, protists and plants, all scale with exponents whose confidence intervals include 3/4 and exclude 2/3. Our analysis of maximal metabolic rate gives a slope that is greater than and confidence intervals that exclude both 3/4 and 2/3. 3. Additionally, numerous other physiological rates that are closely tied to metabolism in a wide variety of organisms, including heart and respiratory rates in mammals, scale as M-1/4. 4. The fact that quarter-power allometric scaling is so pervasive in biology suggests that different allometric relations have a common, mechanistic origin and provides an empirical basis for theoretical models that derive these scaling exponents.

KW - Body size

KW - Metabolic rates

KW - Physiological times

KW - Quarter-power scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642368948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642368948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1642368948

VL - 18

SP - 257

EP - 282

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 2

ER -