The psychological reality of linguistic segments

J. A. Fodor, Thomas G Bever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

201 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during speech supports the following conclusions: (a) Clicks are attracted towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material. (b) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case of clicks located within segments. (c) These results are consistent with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units. (d) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (e) There is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences. This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the two ears.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)414-420
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Volume4
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1965
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Acoustics
Ear
Psychology
linguistics
Syntactics
acoustics
integrity
Psychological Reality

Cite this

The psychological reality of linguistic segments. / Fodor, J. A.; Bever, Thomas G.

In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 4, No. 5, 10.1965, p. 414-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d2997aa2b8f47ddbf8e47652b8d6c40,
title = "The psychological reality of linguistic segments",
abstract = "Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during speech supports the following conclusions: (a) Clicks are attracted towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material. (b) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case of clicks located within segments. (c) These results are consistent with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units. (d) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (e) There is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences. This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the two ears.",
author = "Fodor, {J. A.} and Bever, {Thomas G}",
year = "1965",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "414--420",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychological reality of linguistic segments

AU - Fodor, J. A.

AU - Bever, Thomas G

PY - 1965/10

Y1 - 1965/10

N2 - Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during speech supports the following conclusions: (a) Clicks are attracted towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material. (b) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case of clicks located within segments. (c) These results are consistent with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units. (d) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (e) There is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences. This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the two ears.

AB - Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during speech supports the following conclusions: (a) Clicks are attracted towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material. (b) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case of clicks located within segments. (c) These results are consistent with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units. (d) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (e) There is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences. This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the two ears.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22844431807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22844431807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:22844431807

VL - 4

SP - 414

EP - 420

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 5

ER -