The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps

Brian McElree, Thomas G Bever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In five experiments, recognition times for an adjective from a sentence-initial noun phrase were examined following the processing of coreferential gaps in syntactic structure as a means of determining whether linguistically defined gaps access their antecedents. Recognition latencies and/or error rates following the processing of gaps were found to be lower than a nonanaphoric control in a number of constructions, including two instances of constructions with NP-movement gaps-namely, the passive and raising-to-subject-and constructions with a PRO gap in an infinitival clause. Additionally, NP-movement gaps were found to produce lower latencies and error rates than PRO-gaps. The results are interpreted as evidence for the psychological reality of representational assumptions of Government and Binding Theory (Chomsky, 1981).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-35
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
experiment
evidence
Psychological Reality
Latency
Adjective
Clause
Noam Chomsky
Experiment
Coreferential
Noun Phrase
Government
Binding Theory
Syntactic Structure
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps. / McElree, Brian; Bever, Thomas G.

In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.1989, p. 21-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff0d6afb7d75448d950b4c0cbc772c85,
title = "The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps",
abstract = "In five experiments, recognition times for an adjective from a sentence-initial noun phrase were examined following the processing of coreferential gaps in syntactic structure as a means of determining whether linguistically defined gaps access their antecedents. Recognition latencies and/or error rates following the processing of gaps were found to be lower than a nonanaphoric control in a number of constructions, including two instances of constructions with NP-movement gaps-namely, the passive and raising-to-subject-and constructions with a PRO gap in an infinitival clause. Additionally, NP-movement gaps were found to produce lower latencies and error rates than PRO-gaps. The results are interpreted as evidence for the psychological reality of representational assumptions of Government and Binding Theory (Chomsky, 1981).",
author = "Brian McElree and Bever, {Thomas G}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01069044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "21--35",
journal = "Journal of Psycholinguistic Research",
issn = "0090-6905",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps

AU - McElree, Brian

AU - Bever, Thomas G

PY - 1989/1

Y1 - 1989/1

N2 - In five experiments, recognition times for an adjective from a sentence-initial noun phrase were examined following the processing of coreferential gaps in syntactic structure as a means of determining whether linguistically defined gaps access their antecedents. Recognition latencies and/or error rates following the processing of gaps were found to be lower than a nonanaphoric control in a number of constructions, including two instances of constructions with NP-movement gaps-namely, the passive and raising-to-subject-and constructions with a PRO gap in an infinitival clause. Additionally, NP-movement gaps were found to produce lower latencies and error rates than PRO-gaps. The results are interpreted as evidence for the psychological reality of representational assumptions of Government and Binding Theory (Chomsky, 1981).

AB - In five experiments, recognition times for an adjective from a sentence-initial noun phrase were examined following the processing of coreferential gaps in syntactic structure as a means of determining whether linguistically defined gaps access their antecedents. Recognition latencies and/or error rates following the processing of gaps were found to be lower than a nonanaphoric control in a number of constructions, including two instances of constructions with NP-movement gaps-namely, the passive and raising-to-subject-and constructions with a PRO gap in an infinitival clause. Additionally, NP-movement gaps were found to produce lower latencies and error rates than PRO-gaps. The results are interpreted as evidence for the psychological reality of representational assumptions of Government and Binding Theory (Chomsky, 1981).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002432602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002432602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01069044

DO - 10.1007/BF01069044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002432602

VL - 18

SP - 21

EP - 35

JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

SN - 0090-6905

IS - 1

ER -