The Psychologist and the Psychiatrist as Expert Witnesses

Perceived Credibility and Influence

Jeff L Greenberg, April Wursten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assessed the relative perceptions and influences of MD and PhD expert witnesses. Subjects in favor of or against the insanity defense and with strong or weak issue involvement read a transcript of a burglary and assault case in which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and an MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. Verdicts, general attitude measures, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated a medical bias, primarily in the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-378
Number of pages6
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1988

Fingerprint

Insanity Defense
Expert Testimony
Psychiatry
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The Psychologist and the Psychiatrist as Expert Witnesses : Perceived Credibility and Influence. / Greenberg, Jeff L; Wursten, April.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 4, 08.1988, p. 373-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b19ad2fd4dd4dd8b4e95dc8b448a964,
title = "The Psychologist and the Psychiatrist as Expert Witnesses: Perceived Credibility and Influence",
abstract = "We assessed the relative perceptions and influences of MD and PhD expert witnesses. Subjects in favor of or against the insanity defense and with strong or weak issue involvement read a transcript of a burglary and assault case in which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and an MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. Verdicts, general attitude measures, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated a medical bias, primarily in the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Limitations and implications are discussed.",
author = "Greenberg, {Jeff L} and April Wursten",
year = "1988",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/0735-7028.19.4.373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "373--378",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Psychologist and the Psychiatrist as Expert Witnesses

T2 - Perceived Credibility and Influence

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Wursten, April

PY - 1988/8

Y1 - 1988/8

N2 - We assessed the relative perceptions and influences of MD and PhD expert witnesses. Subjects in favor of or against the insanity defense and with strong or weak issue involvement read a transcript of a burglary and assault case in which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and an MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. Verdicts, general attitude measures, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated a medical bias, primarily in the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Limitations and implications are discussed.

AB - We assessed the relative perceptions and influences of MD and PhD expert witnesses. Subjects in favor of or against the insanity defense and with strong or weak issue involvement read a transcript of a burglary and assault case in which either (a) a PhD testified for the defense and an MD testified for the prosecution or (b) an MD testified for the defense and a PhD testified for the prosecution. Verdicts, general attitude measures, and specific witness credibility evaluations indicated a medical bias, primarily in the PhD-defense/MD-prosecution condition. Limitations and implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013147043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013147043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0735-7028.19.4.373

DO - 10.1037/0735-7028.19.4.373

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 373

EP - 378

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 4

ER -