The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology

Glenn Adams, Sara Estrada-Villalta, Daniel L Sullivan, Hazel Rose Markus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-216
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
psychology
science
cultural psychology
abstraction
development project
well-being
regulation
management
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology. / Adams, Glenn; Estrada-Villalta, Sara; Sullivan, Daniel L; Markus, Hazel Rose.

In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 75, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 189-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adams, Glenn ; Estrada-Villalta, Sara ; Sullivan, Daniel L ; Markus, Hazel Rose. / The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology. In: Journal of Social Issues. 2019 ; Vol. 75, No. 1. pp. 189-216.
@article{f40402ed55424b828006ba98592a9650,
title = "The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology",
abstract = "In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.",
author = "Glenn Adams and Sara Estrada-Villalta and Sullivan, {Daniel L} and Markus, {Hazel Rose}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/josi.12305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "189--216",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Psychology of Neoliberalism and the Neoliberalism of Psychology

AU - Adams, Glenn

AU - Estrada-Villalta, Sara

AU - Sullivan, Daniel L

AU - Markus, Hazel Rose

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.

AB - In this article, we approach the relationship between neoliberalism and psychological science from the theoretical perspective of cultural psychology. In the first section, we trace how engagement with neoliberal systems results in characteristic tendencies—including a radical abstraction of self from social and material context, an entrepreneurial understanding of self as an ongoing development project, an imperative for personal growth and fulfillment, and an emphasis on affect management for self-regulation—that increasingly constitute the knowledge base of mainstream psychological science. However, as we consider in the second section, psychological science is not just an observer of neoliberalism and its impact on psychological experience. Instead, by studying psychological processes independent of cultural–ecological or historical context and by championing individual growth and affective regulation as the key to optimal well-being, psychological scientists reproduce and reinforce the influence and authority of neoliberal systems. Rather than a disinterested bystander, hegemonic forms of psychological science are thoroughly implicated in the neoliberal project.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061289566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061289566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/josi.12305

DO - 10.1111/josi.12305

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 189

EP - 216

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

IS - 1

ER -