The Rank Hypothesis and Lexical Decision: A Reply to Adelman and Brown (2008)

Wayne S. Murray, Kenneth I. Forster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

J. S. Adelman and G. D. A. Brown (2008) provided an extensive analysis of the form of word frequency and contextual diversity effects on lexical decision time. In this reply, the current authors suggest that their analysis provides a valuable tool for the evaluation of models of lexical access and that the results they report are broadly supportive of the rank hypothesis suggested by W. S. Murray and K. I. Forster (2004)-more supportive, in fact, than the originally reported data. However, Adelman and Brown's conclusion that the results of these analyses can be taken as evidence against rank (and thereby serial models of lexical access) and for instance models is rejected. It is shown that at least one instance model makes the wrong predictions and that Adelman and Brown's conclusions rest on the assumption that lexical decision time presents a pure measure of the time involved in lexical access. Results from eye tracking are reported, which also support a rank account, as do results from analyses that show that a log frequency account is clearly inadequate. Finally, it is demonstrated that, unlike other models, the rank account continues to make accurate predictions regarding the form of both reaction time and error rate effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-251
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Review
Volume115
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Keywords

  • eye movements
  • frequency
  • mathematical modeling
  • rank
  • word recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Rank Hypothesis and Lexical Decision: A Reply to Adelman and Brown (2008)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this