The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning-A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models

Joel Lachter, Thomas G Bever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently proposed connectionist models of acquired linguistic behaviors have linguistic rule-based representations built in. Similar connectionist models of language acquisition have arbitrary devices and architectures which make them mimic the effect of rules. Connectionist models in general are not well-suited to account for the acquisition of structural knowledge, and require predetermined structures even to simulate basic linguistic facts. Such models are more appropriate for describing the formation of complex associations between structures which are independently represented. This makes connectionist models potentially important tools in studying the relations between frequent behaviors and the structures underlying knowledge and representations. At the very least, such models may offer computationally powerful ways of demonstrating the limits of associationistic descriptions of behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-247
Number of pages53
JournalCognition
Volume28
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neural Networks (Computer)
Linguistics
Language
Learning
linguistics
language
learning
language acquisition
Equipment and Supplies
Connectionist
Learning Model
Associative
Theory of Language
Connectionist Models
Language Acquisition
knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{0d7fd39d644b4f55ae30cadb623865f3,
title = "The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning-A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models",
abstract = "Recently proposed connectionist models of acquired linguistic behaviors have linguistic rule-based representations built in. Similar connectionist models of language acquisition have arbitrary devices and architectures which make them mimic the effect of rules. Connectionist models in general are not well-suited to account for the acquisition of structural knowledge, and require predetermined structures even to simulate basic linguistic facts. Such models are more appropriate for describing the formation of complex associations between structures which are independently represented. This makes connectionist models potentially important tools in studying the relations between frequent behaviors and the structures underlying knowledge and representations. At the very least, such models may offer computationally powerful ways of demonstrating the limits of associationistic descriptions of behavior.",
author = "Joel Lachter and Bever, {Thomas G}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0010-0277(88)90033-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "195--247",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning-A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models

AU - Lachter, Joel

AU - Bever, Thomas G

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Recently proposed connectionist models of acquired linguistic behaviors have linguistic rule-based representations built in. Similar connectionist models of language acquisition have arbitrary devices and architectures which make them mimic the effect of rules. Connectionist models in general are not well-suited to account for the acquisition of structural knowledge, and require predetermined structures even to simulate basic linguistic facts. Such models are more appropriate for describing the formation of complex associations between structures which are independently represented. This makes connectionist models potentially important tools in studying the relations between frequent behaviors and the structures underlying knowledge and representations. At the very least, such models may offer computationally powerful ways of demonstrating the limits of associationistic descriptions of behavior.

AB - Recently proposed connectionist models of acquired linguistic behaviors have linguistic rule-based representations built in. Similar connectionist models of language acquisition have arbitrary devices and architectures which make them mimic the effect of rules. Connectionist models in general are not well-suited to account for the acquisition of structural knowledge, and require predetermined structures even to simulate basic linguistic facts. Such models are more appropriate for describing the formation of complex associations between structures which are independently represented. This makes connectionist models potentially important tools in studying the relations between frequent behaviors and the structures underlying knowledge and representations. At the very least, such models may offer computationally powerful ways of demonstrating the limits of associationistic descriptions of behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023968897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023968897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90033-9

DO - 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90033-9

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 195

EP - 247

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 1-2

ER -