The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model

Chi Yuan, Peter Chesson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although it is likely that many coexistence mechanisms contribute to maintenance of species diversity, most approaches to understanding species coexistence proceed as if only one mechanism would be present. In studies of species coexistence in a temporally fluctuating environment, the storage effect, believed to be the most important coexistence mechanism, has been the focus. Although a different coexistence mechanism-relative nonlinearity-is also predicted to arise frequently with environmental variation, its effect has been overshadowed by the storage effect. The relatively nonlinear growth rates on which the mechanism depends arise simply from differences in life history traits. Many kinds of temporal variation can then interact with these nonlinearity differences to create the relative nonlinearity coexistence mechanism. Much is unknown about when this mechanism is important and its total neglect is not justified. Here, we use the lottery model to provide a much needed quantitative assessment of the relative and combined effects of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Our analysis takes advantage of recently developed techniques for quantifying coexistence mechanisms when multiple mechanisms operate in concert. We find that relative nonlinearity is able to contribute substantially to species coexistence in the lottery model when two conditions are satisfied: (1) species must differ greatly in their adult death rates, (2) sensitivity of recruitment to environmental variation must be greater for species with larger adult death rates. In addition, relative nonlinearity has a critical role in compensating for a weakened storage effect when there is high correlation between species in their responses to the varying environment. In some circumstances relative nonlinearity is stronger than the storage effect or is even the sole mechanism of coexistence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalTheoretical Population Biology
Volume105
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

nonlinearity
coexistence
temporal variation
life history
effect
species diversity
life history trait
methodology

Keywords

  • Equalizing mechanism
  • Relative nonlinearity
  • Species coexistence
  • Stabilizing mechanism
  • The storage effect
  • Variable environment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model. / Yuan, Chi; Chesson, Peter.

In: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 105, 01.11.2015, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6086620adf534fa3ac35fbe4b3753186,
title = "The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model",
abstract = "Although it is likely that many coexistence mechanisms contribute to maintenance of species diversity, most approaches to understanding species coexistence proceed as if only one mechanism would be present. In studies of species coexistence in a temporally fluctuating environment, the storage effect, believed to be the most important coexistence mechanism, has been the focus. Although a different coexistence mechanism-relative nonlinearity-is also predicted to arise frequently with environmental variation, its effect has been overshadowed by the storage effect. The relatively nonlinear growth rates on which the mechanism depends arise simply from differences in life history traits. Many kinds of temporal variation can then interact with these nonlinearity differences to create the relative nonlinearity coexistence mechanism. Much is unknown about when this mechanism is important and its total neglect is not justified. Here, we use the lottery model to provide a much needed quantitative assessment of the relative and combined effects of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Our analysis takes advantage of recently developed techniques for quantifying coexistence mechanisms when multiple mechanisms operate in concert. We find that relative nonlinearity is able to contribute substantially to species coexistence in the lottery model when two conditions are satisfied: (1) species must differ greatly in their adult death rates, (2) sensitivity of recruitment to environmental variation must be greater for species with larger adult death rates. In addition, relative nonlinearity has a critical role in compensating for a weakened storage effect when there is high correlation between species in their responses to the varying environment. In some circumstances relative nonlinearity is stronger than the storage effect or is even the sole mechanism of coexistence.",
keywords = "Equalizing mechanism, Relative nonlinearity, Species coexistence, Stabilizing mechanism, The storage effect, Variable environment",
author = "Chi Yuan and Peter Chesson",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "Theoretical Population Biology",
issn = "0040-5809",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative importance of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect in the lottery model

AU - Yuan, Chi

AU - Chesson, Peter

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Although it is likely that many coexistence mechanisms contribute to maintenance of species diversity, most approaches to understanding species coexistence proceed as if only one mechanism would be present. In studies of species coexistence in a temporally fluctuating environment, the storage effect, believed to be the most important coexistence mechanism, has been the focus. Although a different coexistence mechanism-relative nonlinearity-is also predicted to arise frequently with environmental variation, its effect has been overshadowed by the storage effect. The relatively nonlinear growth rates on which the mechanism depends arise simply from differences in life history traits. Many kinds of temporal variation can then interact with these nonlinearity differences to create the relative nonlinearity coexistence mechanism. Much is unknown about when this mechanism is important and its total neglect is not justified. Here, we use the lottery model to provide a much needed quantitative assessment of the relative and combined effects of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Our analysis takes advantage of recently developed techniques for quantifying coexistence mechanisms when multiple mechanisms operate in concert. We find that relative nonlinearity is able to contribute substantially to species coexistence in the lottery model when two conditions are satisfied: (1) species must differ greatly in their adult death rates, (2) sensitivity of recruitment to environmental variation must be greater for species with larger adult death rates. In addition, relative nonlinearity has a critical role in compensating for a weakened storage effect when there is high correlation between species in their responses to the varying environment. In some circumstances relative nonlinearity is stronger than the storage effect or is even the sole mechanism of coexistence.

AB - Although it is likely that many coexistence mechanisms contribute to maintenance of species diversity, most approaches to understanding species coexistence proceed as if only one mechanism would be present. In studies of species coexistence in a temporally fluctuating environment, the storage effect, believed to be the most important coexistence mechanism, has been the focus. Although a different coexistence mechanism-relative nonlinearity-is also predicted to arise frequently with environmental variation, its effect has been overshadowed by the storage effect. The relatively nonlinear growth rates on which the mechanism depends arise simply from differences in life history traits. Many kinds of temporal variation can then interact with these nonlinearity differences to create the relative nonlinearity coexistence mechanism. Much is unknown about when this mechanism is important and its total neglect is not justified. Here, we use the lottery model to provide a much needed quantitative assessment of the relative and combined effects of relative nonlinearity and the storage effect. Our analysis takes advantage of recently developed techniques for quantifying coexistence mechanisms when multiple mechanisms operate in concert. We find that relative nonlinearity is able to contribute substantially to species coexistence in the lottery model when two conditions are satisfied: (1) species must differ greatly in their adult death rates, (2) sensitivity of recruitment to environmental variation must be greater for species with larger adult death rates. In addition, relative nonlinearity has a critical role in compensating for a weakened storage effect when there is high correlation between species in their responses to the varying environment. In some circumstances relative nonlinearity is stronger than the storage effect or is even the sole mechanism of coexistence.

KW - Equalizing mechanism

KW - Relative nonlinearity

KW - Species coexistence

KW - Stabilizing mechanism

KW - The storage effect

KW - Variable environment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943650183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943650183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 26307205

AN - SCOPUS:84943650183

VL - 105

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - Theoretical Population Biology

JF - Theoretical Population Biology

SN - 0040-5809

ER -