The RESTORE Program of Restorative Justice for Sex Crimes

Vision, Process, and Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article reports empirical evaluation of RESTORE, a restorative justice (RJ) conferencing program adapted to prosecutor-referred adult misdemeanor and felony sexual assaults. RESTORE conferences included voluntary enrollment, preparation, and a face-to-face meeting where primary and secondary victims voice impacts, and responsible persons acknowledge their acts and together develop a re-dress plan that is supervised for 1 year. Process data included referral and consent rates, participant characteristics, observational ratings of conferences compared with program design, services delivered, and safety monitoring. Outcome evaluation used 22 cases to assess (a) pre-post reasons for choosing RESTORE, (b) preparation and conference experiences, (c) overall program and justice satisfaction, and (d) completion rates. This is the first peer-reviewed quantitative evaluation of RJ conferencing for adult sexual assault. Although the data have limitations, the results support cautious optimism regarding feasibility, safety, and satisfactory outcomes. They help envision how conferencing could expand and individualize justice options for sexual assault.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1623-1660
Number of pages38
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Crime
Safety
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • criminology
  • law and justice
  • offender treatment
  • rape
  • restorative justice
  • sexual assault
  • sexual crime
  • victim-offender dialogue
  • victimology
  • violence prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The RESTORE Program of Restorative Justice for Sex Crimes : Vision, Process, and Outcomes. / Koss, Mary P.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2014, p. 1623-1660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{18a88532657c495fbb8904e8996efcfc,
title = "The RESTORE Program of Restorative Justice for Sex Crimes: Vision, Process, and Outcomes",
abstract = "The article reports empirical evaluation of RESTORE, a restorative justice (RJ) conferencing program adapted to prosecutor-referred adult misdemeanor and felony sexual assaults. RESTORE conferences included voluntary enrollment, preparation, and a face-to-face meeting where primary and secondary victims voice impacts, and responsible persons acknowledge their acts and together develop a re-dress plan that is supervised for 1 year. Process data included referral and consent rates, participant characteristics, observational ratings of conferences compared with program design, services delivered, and safety monitoring. Outcome evaluation used 22 cases to assess (a) pre-post reasons for choosing RESTORE, (b) preparation and conference experiences, (c) overall program and justice satisfaction, and (d) completion rates. This is the first peer-reviewed quantitative evaluation of RJ conferencing for adult sexual assault. Although the data have limitations, the results support cautious optimism regarding feasibility, safety, and satisfactory outcomes. They help envision how conferencing could expand and individualize justice options for sexual assault.",
keywords = "criminology, law and justice, offender treatment, rape, restorative justice, sexual assault, sexual crime, victim-offender dialogue, victimology, violence prevention",
author = "Koss, {Mary P}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0886260513511537",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1623--1660",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The RESTORE Program of Restorative Justice for Sex Crimes

T2 - Vision, Process, and Outcomes

AU - Koss, Mary P

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The article reports empirical evaluation of RESTORE, a restorative justice (RJ) conferencing program adapted to prosecutor-referred adult misdemeanor and felony sexual assaults. RESTORE conferences included voluntary enrollment, preparation, and a face-to-face meeting where primary and secondary victims voice impacts, and responsible persons acknowledge their acts and together develop a re-dress plan that is supervised for 1 year. Process data included referral and consent rates, participant characteristics, observational ratings of conferences compared with program design, services delivered, and safety monitoring. Outcome evaluation used 22 cases to assess (a) pre-post reasons for choosing RESTORE, (b) preparation and conference experiences, (c) overall program and justice satisfaction, and (d) completion rates. This is the first peer-reviewed quantitative evaluation of RJ conferencing for adult sexual assault. Although the data have limitations, the results support cautious optimism regarding feasibility, safety, and satisfactory outcomes. They help envision how conferencing could expand and individualize justice options for sexual assault.

AB - The article reports empirical evaluation of RESTORE, a restorative justice (RJ) conferencing program adapted to prosecutor-referred adult misdemeanor and felony sexual assaults. RESTORE conferences included voluntary enrollment, preparation, and a face-to-face meeting where primary and secondary victims voice impacts, and responsible persons acknowledge their acts and together develop a re-dress plan that is supervised for 1 year. Process data included referral and consent rates, participant characteristics, observational ratings of conferences compared with program design, services delivered, and safety monitoring. Outcome evaluation used 22 cases to assess (a) pre-post reasons for choosing RESTORE, (b) preparation and conference experiences, (c) overall program and justice satisfaction, and (d) completion rates. This is the first peer-reviewed quantitative evaluation of RJ conferencing for adult sexual assault. Although the data have limitations, the results support cautious optimism regarding feasibility, safety, and satisfactory outcomes. They help envision how conferencing could expand and individualize justice options for sexual assault.

KW - criminology

KW - law and justice

KW - offender treatment

KW - rape

KW - restorative justice

KW - sexual assault

KW - sexual crime

KW - victim-offender dialogue

KW - victimology

KW - violence prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899688314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899688314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260513511537

DO - 10.1177/0886260513511537

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1623

EP - 1660

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 9

ER -