The right to privacy is political: Power, the boundary between public and private, and sexual harassment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper concerns the relationship between power and the ability to defend the right of privacy. The discourse of public and private spheres has shifted historically, engendering arbitrary and changing legal and cultural definitions of the boundary between public and private. Historic specifications of this boundary have become untenable as increasing numbers of women entered the paid labor force. Recent formulations define the boundary of privacy as an area within each individual's life. However, greater social power increases the ability to protect personal privacy because it offers the ability to define and protect the "private" from scrutiny. After outlining the history of the shifting public/private boundary, this argument is applied to sexual harassment. Explicitly sexual types of harassment are related to the public/private boundary in two ways. First, they challenge the boundary itself, representing the occurrence of "private" conduct in the "public" sphere of work and education. Second, sexual harassment reveals the importance of social power in defining and defending one's privacy. Sexual harassment represents the extreme on a continuum of communication patterns between status unequals, and an invasion of the sexual privacy of the target.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-71
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
Volume24
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

right to privacy
sexual harassment
political power
privacy
ability
communication pattern
invasion
labor force
discourse
history
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The right to privacy is political : Power, the boundary between public and private, and sexual harassment. / Roth, Louise M.

In: Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 1, 12.1999, p. 45-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77c2b87677d6453ca0e0799d6ebb7ffe,
title = "The right to privacy is political: Power, the boundary between public and private, and sexual harassment",
abstract = "This paper concerns the relationship between power and the ability to defend the right of privacy. The discourse of public and private spheres has shifted historically, engendering arbitrary and changing legal and cultural definitions of the boundary between public and private. Historic specifications of this boundary have become untenable as increasing numbers of women entered the paid labor force. Recent formulations define the boundary of privacy as an area within each individual's life. However, greater social power increases the ability to protect personal privacy because it offers the ability to define and protect the {"}private{"} from scrutiny. After outlining the history of the shifting public/private boundary, this argument is applied to sexual harassment. Explicitly sexual types of harassment are related to the public/private boundary in two ways. First, they challenge the boundary itself, representing the occurrence of {"}private{"} conduct in the {"}public{"} sphere of work and education. Second, sexual harassment reveals the importance of social power in defining and defending one's privacy. Sexual harassment represents the extreme on a continuum of communication patterns between status unequals, and an invasion of the sexual privacy of the target.",
author = "Roth, {Louise M}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "45--71",
journal = "Law and Social Inquiry",
issn = "0897-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The right to privacy is political

T2 - Power, the boundary between public and private, and sexual harassment

AU - Roth, Louise M

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - This paper concerns the relationship between power and the ability to defend the right of privacy. The discourse of public and private spheres has shifted historically, engendering arbitrary and changing legal and cultural definitions of the boundary between public and private. Historic specifications of this boundary have become untenable as increasing numbers of women entered the paid labor force. Recent formulations define the boundary of privacy as an area within each individual's life. However, greater social power increases the ability to protect personal privacy because it offers the ability to define and protect the "private" from scrutiny. After outlining the history of the shifting public/private boundary, this argument is applied to sexual harassment. Explicitly sexual types of harassment are related to the public/private boundary in two ways. First, they challenge the boundary itself, representing the occurrence of "private" conduct in the "public" sphere of work and education. Second, sexual harassment reveals the importance of social power in defining and defending one's privacy. Sexual harassment represents the extreme on a continuum of communication patterns between status unequals, and an invasion of the sexual privacy of the target.

AB - This paper concerns the relationship between power and the ability to defend the right of privacy. The discourse of public and private spheres has shifted historically, engendering arbitrary and changing legal and cultural definitions of the boundary between public and private. Historic specifications of this boundary have become untenable as increasing numbers of women entered the paid labor force. Recent formulations define the boundary of privacy as an area within each individual's life. However, greater social power increases the ability to protect personal privacy because it offers the ability to define and protect the "private" from scrutiny. After outlining the history of the shifting public/private boundary, this argument is applied to sexual harassment. Explicitly sexual types of harassment are related to the public/private boundary in two ways. First, they challenge the boundary itself, representing the occurrence of "private" conduct in the "public" sphere of work and education. Second, sexual harassment reveals the importance of social power in defining and defending one's privacy. Sexual harassment represents the extreme on a continuum of communication patterns between status unequals, and an invasion of the sexual privacy of the target.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033460719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033460719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033460719

VL - 24

SP - 45

EP - 71

JO - Law and Social Inquiry

JF - Law and Social Inquiry

SN - 0897-6546

IS - 1

ER -