The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring

A neurophysiological study of minorities under threat

Chad E. Forbes, Toni Schmader, John JB Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychological disengagement allows stigmatized individuals to cope with negative outcomes in stereotype-relevant domains, but its role in online performance monitoring and adjustment is unknown. This study examined how two forms of disengagement (devaluing and discounting) predict performance monitoring at an early (motivational) and later (interpretational) stage of error processing. Among minority college students, event-related brain activity was measured in response to errors on tasks described neutrally or as diagnostic of intelligence. Results found dissociable effects for error-related negativity (ERN) and later positivity (Pe). When the task was linked to intelligence, valuing academics predicted larger ERNs. Unexpectedly, discounting tendencies predicted smaller Pes when the task was described neutrally, a relationship that was attenuated and somewhat reversed when explicitly linking the task to intelligence. In the diagnostic condition, valuing also predicted more efficient behavioral responses to errors, whereas discounting predicted more negative task construals. Results suggest that among stereotype threatened minority students, devaluing has implications for early stage motivational processes involved in monitoring and responding to errors, whereas discounting may have implications for later construal processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-261
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Neurophysiological Monitoring
Intelligence
Students
Social Adjustment
Psychology
Brain

Keywords

  • ERN
  • Event-related potentials
  • Pe
  • Performance monitoring
  • Psychological disengagement
  • Social neuroscience
  • Stereotype threat
  • Stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring : A neurophysiological study of minorities under threat. / Forbes, Chad E.; Schmader, Toni; Allen, John JB.

In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2008, p. 253-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d64c920bb4640d0851c68401095b3e1,
title = "The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring: A neurophysiological study of minorities under threat",
abstract = "Psychological disengagement allows stigmatized individuals to cope with negative outcomes in stereotype-relevant domains, but its role in online performance monitoring and adjustment is unknown. This study examined how two forms of disengagement (devaluing and discounting) predict performance monitoring at an early (motivational) and later (interpretational) stage of error processing. Among minority college students, event-related brain activity was measured in response to errors on tasks described neutrally or as diagnostic of intelligence. Results found dissociable effects for error-related negativity (ERN) and later positivity (Pe). When the task was linked to intelligence, valuing academics predicted larger ERNs. Unexpectedly, discounting tendencies predicted smaller Pes when the task was described neutrally, a relationship that was attenuated and somewhat reversed when explicitly linking the task to intelligence. In the diagnostic condition, valuing also predicted more efficient behavioral responses to errors, whereas discounting predicted more negative task construals. Results suggest that among stereotype threatened minority students, devaluing has implications for early stage motivational processes involved in monitoring and responding to errors, whereas discounting may have implications for later construal processes.",
keywords = "ERN, Event-related potentials, Pe, Performance monitoring, Psychological disengagement, Social neuroscience, Stereotype threat, Stigma",
author = "Forbes, {Chad E.} and Toni Schmader and Allen, {John JB}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/scan/nsn012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "253--261",
journal = "Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience",
issn = "1749-5024",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring

T2 - A neurophysiological study of minorities under threat

AU - Forbes, Chad E.

AU - Schmader, Toni

AU - Allen, John JB

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Psychological disengagement allows stigmatized individuals to cope with negative outcomes in stereotype-relevant domains, but its role in online performance monitoring and adjustment is unknown. This study examined how two forms of disengagement (devaluing and discounting) predict performance monitoring at an early (motivational) and later (interpretational) stage of error processing. Among minority college students, event-related brain activity was measured in response to errors on tasks described neutrally or as diagnostic of intelligence. Results found dissociable effects for error-related negativity (ERN) and later positivity (Pe). When the task was linked to intelligence, valuing academics predicted larger ERNs. Unexpectedly, discounting tendencies predicted smaller Pes when the task was described neutrally, a relationship that was attenuated and somewhat reversed when explicitly linking the task to intelligence. In the diagnostic condition, valuing also predicted more efficient behavioral responses to errors, whereas discounting predicted more negative task construals. Results suggest that among stereotype threatened minority students, devaluing has implications for early stage motivational processes involved in monitoring and responding to errors, whereas discounting may have implications for later construal processes.

AB - Psychological disengagement allows stigmatized individuals to cope with negative outcomes in stereotype-relevant domains, but its role in online performance monitoring and adjustment is unknown. This study examined how two forms of disengagement (devaluing and discounting) predict performance monitoring at an early (motivational) and later (interpretational) stage of error processing. Among minority college students, event-related brain activity was measured in response to errors on tasks described neutrally or as diagnostic of intelligence. Results found dissociable effects for error-related negativity (ERN) and later positivity (Pe). When the task was linked to intelligence, valuing academics predicted larger ERNs. Unexpectedly, discounting tendencies predicted smaller Pes when the task was described neutrally, a relationship that was attenuated and somewhat reversed when explicitly linking the task to intelligence. In the diagnostic condition, valuing also predicted more efficient behavioral responses to errors, whereas discounting predicted more negative task construals. Results suggest that among stereotype threatened minority students, devaluing has implications for early stage motivational processes involved in monitoring and responding to errors, whereas discounting may have implications for later construal processes.

KW - ERN

KW - Event-related potentials

KW - Pe

KW - Performance monitoring

KW - Psychological disengagement

KW - Social neuroscience

KW - Stereotype threat

KW - Stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52249094600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52249094600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsn012

DO - 10.1093/scan/nsn012

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 253

EP - 261

JO - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

JF - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

SN - 1749-5024

IS - 3

ER -