The role of language in memory for actions

Matthew Finkbeiner, Janet L Nicol, Delia Greth, Kumiko Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Languages differ with respect to how aspects of motion events tend to be lexicalized. English typically conflates MOTION with MANNER, but Japanese and Spanish typically do not. We report a set of experiments that assessed the effect of this cross-linguistic difference on participants' decisions in a similarity-judgment task about scenes containing novel animations as stimuli. In Experiment 1, which required participants to encode the stimuli briefly into memory, we observed a language effect; in Experiment 2, which required participants to analyze the same stimuli, but not remember them, the language effect disappeared. Hence, these, experiments reveal a task-dependent effect, which, we argue, points to working memory as the source of the language effect observed in Experiment 1 and, potentially, other experiments that have shown a linguistic relativity effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-457
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Language
experiment
Linguistics
language
stimulus
Short-Term Memory
linguistics
Experiment
event
Stimulus

Keywords

  • Language
  • Linguistic relativity
  • Motion events
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

The role of language in memory for actions. / Finkbeiner, Matthew; Nicol, Janet L; Greth, Delia; Nakamura, Kumiko.

In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2002, p. 447-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finkbeiner, Matthew ; Nicol, Janet L ; Greth, Delia ; Nakamura, Kumiko. / The role of language in memory for actions. In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2002 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 447-457.
@article{7e4d84dc7d7c430caf12074d76003210,
title = "The role of language in memory for actions",
abstract = "Languages differ with respect to how aspects of motion events tend to be lexicalized. English typically conflates MOTION with MANNER, but Japanese and Spanish typically do not. We report a set of experiments that assessed the effect of this cross-linguistic difference on participants' decisions in a similarity-judgment task about scenes containing novel animations as stimuli. In Experiment 1, which required participants to encode the stimuli briefly into memory, we observed a language effect; in Experiment 2, which required participants to analyze the same stimuli, but not remember them, the language effect disappeared. Hence, these, experiments reveal a task-dependent effect, which, we argue, points to working memory as the source of the language effect observed in Experiment 1 and, potentially, other experiments that have shown a linguistic relativity effect.",
keywords = "Language, Linguistic relativity, Motion events, Working memory",
author = "Matthew Finkbeiner and Nicol, {Janet L} and Delia Greth and Kumiko Nakamura",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1023/A:1021204802485",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "447--457",
journal = "Journal of Psycholinguistic Research",
issn = "0090-6905",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of language in memory for actions

AU - Finkbeiner, Matthew

AU - Nicol, Janet L

AU - Greth, Delia

AU - Nakamura, Kumiko

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Languages differ with respect to how aspects of motion events tend to be lexicalized. English typically conflates MOTION with MANNER, but Japanese and Spanish typically do not. We report a set of experiments that assessed the effect of this cross-linguistic difference on participants' decisions in a similarity-judgment task about scenes containing novel animations as stimuli. In Experiment 1, which required participants to encode the stimuli briefly into memory, we observed a language effect; in Experiment 2, which required participants to analyze the same stimuli, but not remember them, the language effect disappeared. Hence, these, experiments reveal a task-dependent effect, which, we argue, points to working memory as the source of the language effect observed in Experiment 1 and, potentially, other experiments that have shown a linguistic relativity effect.

AB - Languages differ with respect to how aspects of motion events tend to be lexicalized. English typically conflates MOTION with MANNER, but Japanese and Spanish typically do not. We report a set of experiments that assessed the effect of this cross-linguistic difference on participants' decisions in a similarity-judgment task about scenes containing novel animations as stimuli. In Experiment 1, which required participants to encode the stimuli briefly into memory, we observed a language effect; in Experiment 2, which required participants to analyze the same stimuli, but not remember them, the language effect disappeared. Hence, these, experiments reveal a task-dependent effect, which, we argue, points to working memory as the source of the language effect observed in Experiment 1 and, potentially, other experiments that have shown a linguistic relativity effect.

KW - Language

KW - Linguistic relativity

KW - Motion events

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036768292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036768292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1021204802485

DO - 10.1023/A:1021204802485

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 447

EP - 457

JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

SN - 0090-6905

IS - 5

ER -