The role of perception in imaging

Past and future

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accurate and efficient interpretation of medical images relies on a host of factors. Clearly the technologies and methods used to acquire, process, transmit, store, and display the image and associated data are critical, but they are only one-half of the equation. In the end, the final diagnostic interpretation and recommendations for further action lie with the clinician. Ideally we would like to believe that all decisions rendered by competent clinicians are correct, but the interpretation task is not always easy or black and white. Thus, decisions are not always absolutely conclusive, are often formulated with plausible alternatives, and errors in interpretation can and do occur regularly. The discipline of medical image perception seeks an improved understanding of the perceptual factors that underlie the creation and interpretation of medical images, with the belief that improved diagnostic performance with the use of imaging devices can be achieved by the development of systems that are optimized for the interpretation of visual diagnostic information. Perception research can identify specific reasons for missed diagnoses, thereby helping to train physicians and eliminate diagnostic errors, and clarifying situations in which errors are a consequence of fundamentally ambiguous information rather than poor reader performance. The goal of this article is to provide a short review of the history of the discipline of medical image perception, highlight key research areas, and provide a look toward the future regarding the role that medical image perception research will continue to fill as imaging technology in medicine advances and develops.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)392-400
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Research
Technology
Diagnostic Errors
History
Medicine
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
hydroquinone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The role of perception in imaging : Past and future. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A.

In: Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 6, 11.2011, p. 392-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f3c05cb719e4140b36ea7cc1a17c2df,
title = "The role of perception in imaging: Past and future",
abstract = "The accurate and efficient interpretation of medical images relies on a host of factors. Clearly the technologies and methods used to acquire, process, transmit, store, and display the image and associated data are critical, but they are only one-half of the equation. In the end, the final diagnostic interpretation and recommendations for further action lie with the clinician. Ideally we would like to believe that all decisions rendered by competent clinicians are correct, but the interpretation task is not always easy or black and white. Thus, decisions are not always absolutely conclusive, are often formulated with plausible alternatives, and errors in interpretation can and do occur regularly. The discipline of medical image perception seeks an improved understanding of the perceptual factors that underlie the creation and interpretation of medical images, with the belief that improved diagnostic performance with the use of imaging devices can be achieved by the development of systems that are optimized for the interpretation of visual diagnostic information. Perception research can identify specific reasons for missed diagnoses, thereby helping to train physicians and eliminate diagnostic errors, and clarifying situations in which errors are a consequence of fundamentally ambiguous information rather than poor reader performance. The goal of this article is to provide a short review of the history of the discipline of medical image perception, highlight key research areas, and provide a look toward the future regarding the role that medical image perception research will continue to fill as imaging technology in medicine advances and develops.",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "392--400",
journal = "Seminars in Nuclear Medicine",
issn = "0001-2998",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of perception in imaging

T2 - Past and future

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - The accurate and efficient interpretation of medical images relies on a host of factors. Clearly the technologies and methods used to acquire, process, transmit, store, and display the image and associated data are critical, but they are only one-half of the equation. In the end, the final diagnostic interpretation and recommendations for further action lie with the clinician. Ideally we would like to believe that all decisions rendered by competent clinicians are correct, but the interpretation task is not always easy or black and white. Thus, decisions are not always absolutely conclusive, are often formulated with plausible alternatives, and errors in interpretation can and do occur regularly. The discipline of medical image perception seeks an improved understanding of the perceptual factors that underlie the creation and interpretation of medical images, with the belief that improved diagnostic performance with the use of imaging devices can be achieved by the development of systems that are optimized for the interpretation of visual diagnostic information. Perception research can identify specific reasons for missed diagnoses, thereby helping to train physicians and eliminate diagnostic errors, and clarifying situations in which errors are a consequence of fundamentally ambiguous information rather than poor reader performance. The goal of this article is to provide a short review of the history of the discipline of medical image perception, highlight key research areas, and provide a look toward the future regarding the role that medical image perception research will continue to fill as imaging technology in medicine advances and develops.

AB - The accurate and efficient interpretation of medical images relies on a host of factors. Clearly the technologies and methods used to acquire, process, transmit, store, and display the image and associated data are critical, but they are only one-half of the equation. In the end, the final diagnostic interpretation and recommendations for further action lie with the clinician. Ideally we would like to believe that all decisions rendered by competent clinicians are correct, but the interpretation task is not always easy or black and white. Thus, decisions are not always absolutely conclusive, are often formulated with plausible alternatives, and errors in interpretation can and do occur regularly. The discipline of medical image perception seeks an improved understanding of the perceptual factors that underlie the creation and interpretation of medical images, with the belief that improved diagnostic performance with the use of imaging devices can be achieved by the development of systems that are optimized for the interpretation of visual diagnostic information. Perception research can identify specific reasons for missed diagnoses, thereby helping to train physicians and eliminate diagnostic errors, and clarifying situations in which errors are a consequence of fundamentally ambiguous information rather than poor reader performance. The goal of this article is to provide a short review of the history of the discipline of medical image perception, highlight key research areas, and provide a look toward the future regarding the role that medical image perception research will continue to fill as imaging technology in medicine advances and develops.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053524183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053524183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.002

DO - 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 392

EP - 400

JO - Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

JF - Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

SN - 0001-2998

IS - 6

ER -