The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming

Matthew Finkbeiner, Kenneth I Forster, Janet L Nicol, Kumiko Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

137 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A well-known asymmetry exists in the bilingual masked priming literature in which lexical decision is used: namely, masked primes in the dominant language (L1) facilitate decision times on targets in the less dominant language (L2), but not vice versa. In semantic categorization, on the other hand, priming is symmetrical. In Experiments 1-3 we confirm this task difference, finding robust masked L2-L1 translation priming in semantic categorization but not lexical decision. In formulating an account for these findings, we begin with the assumption of a representational asymmetry between L1 and L2 lexical semantic representations, such that L1 representations are richly populated and L2 representations are not. According to this representational account, L2-L1 priming does not occur in lexical decision because an insufficient proportion of the L1 lexical semantic representation is activated by the L2 prime. In semantic categorization, we argue that the semantic information recruited to generate a decision is restricted by the task category, and that this restriction enhances the effectiveness of the L2 prime. In Experiments 4-6, these assumptions were tested in a within-language setting by pairing many-sense words (e.g., "head") with few-sense words (e.g., "skull"). In lexical decision, robust priming was obtained in the many-to-few direction (analogous to L1-L2), but, no priming was obtained in the few-to-many direction (analogous to L2-L1) using the same word pairs. Priming in semantic categorization, on the other hand, was obtained in both directions. We propose the Sense Model as a possible account of these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Semantics
semantics
Language
asymmetry
language
experiment
Polysemy
Priming
Skull
Experiments
Head
Semantic Categorization
Lexical Decision
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Bilingual lexical processing
  • Bilingual lexicon
  • Lexical decision
  • Masked translation priming
  • Semantic categorization
  • Semantic priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. / Finkbeiner, Matthew; Forster, Kenneth I; Nicol, Janet L; Nakamura, Kumiko.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 51, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29a204d8411a4e3db56b8509e3ac000b,
title = "The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming",
abstract = "A well-known asymmetry exists in the bilingual masked priming literature in which lexical decision is used: namely, masked primes in the dominant language (L1) facilitate decision times on targets in the less dominant language (L2), but not vice versa. In semantic categorization, on the other hand, priming is symmetrical. In Experiments 1-3 we confirm this task difference, finding robust masked L2-L1 translation priming in semantic categorization but not lexical decision. In formulating an account for these findings, we begin with the assumption of a representational asymmetry between L1 and L2 lexical semantic representations, such that L1 representations are richly populated and L2 representations are not. According to this representational account, L2-L1 priming does not occur in lexical decision because an insufficient proportion of the L1 lexical semantic representation is activated by the L2 prime. In semantic categorization, we argue that the semantic information recruited to generate a decision is restricted by the task category, and that this restriction enhances the effectiveness of the L2 prime. In Experiments 4-6, these assumptions were tested in a within-language setting by pairing many-sense words (e.g., {"}head{"}) with few-sense words (e.g., {"}skull{"}). In lexical decision, robust priming was obtained in the many-to-few direction (analogous to L1-L2), but, no priming was obtained in the few-to-many direction (analogous to L2-L1) using the same word pairs. Priming in semantic categorization, on the other hand, was obtained in both directions. We propose the Sense Model as a possible account of these findings.",
keywords = "Bilingual lexical processing, Bilingual lexicon, Lexical decision, Masked translation priming, Semantic categorization, Semantic priming",
author = "Matthew Finkbeiner and Forster, {Kenneth I} and Nicol, {Janet L} and Kumiko Nakamura",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming

AU - Finkbeiner, Matthew

AU - Forster, Kenneth I

AU - Nicol, Janet L

AU - Nakamura, Kumiko

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - A well-known asymmetry exists in the bilingual masked priming literature in which lexical decision is used: namely, masked primes in the dominant language (L1) facilitate decision times on targets in the less dominant language (L2), but not vice versa. In semantic categorization, on the other hand, priming is symmetrical. In Experiments 1-3 we confirm this task difference, finding robust masked L2-L1 translation priming in semantic categorization but not lexical decision. In formulating an account for these findings, we begin with the assumption of a representational asymmetry between L1 and L2 lexical semantic representations, such that L1 representations are richly populated and L2 representations are not. According to this representational account, L2-L1 priming does not occur in lexical decision because an insufficient proportion of the L1 lexical semantic representation is activated by the L2 prime. In semantic categorization, we argue that the semantic information recruited to generate a decision is restricted by the task category, and that this restriction enhances the effectiveness of the L2 prime. In Experiments 4-6, these assumptions were tested in a within-language setting by pairing many-sense words (e.g., "head") with few-sense words (e.g., "skull"). In lexical decision, robust priming was obtained in the many-to-few direction (analogous to L1-L2), but, no priming was obtained in the few-to-many direction (analogous to L2-L1) using the same word pairs. Priming in semantic categorization, on the other hand, was obtained in both directions. We propose the Sense Model as a possible account of these findings.

AB - A well-known asymmetry exists in the bilingual masked priming literature in which lexical decision is used: namely, masked primes in the dominant language (L1) facilitate decision times on targets in the less dominant language (L2), but not vice versa. In semantic categorization, on the other hand, priming is symmetrical. In Experiments 1-3 we confirm this task difference, finding robust masked L2-L1 translation priming in semantic categorization but not lexical decision. In formulating an account for these findings, we begin with the assumption of a representational asymmetry between L1 and L2 lexical semantic representations, such that L1 representations are richly populated and L2 representations are not. According to this representational account, L2-L1 priming does not occur in lexical decision because an insufficient proportion of the L1 lexical semantic representation is activated by the L2 prime. In semantic categorization, we argue that the semantic information recruited to generate a decision is restricted by the task category, and that this restriction enhances the effectiveness of the L2 prime. In Experiments 4-6, these assumptions were tested in a within-language setting by pairing many-sense words (e.g., "head") with few-sense words (e.g., "skull"). In lexical decision, robust priming was obtained in the many-to-few direction (analogous to L1-L2), but, no priming was obtained in the few-to-many direction (analogous to L2-L1) using the same word pairs. Priming in semantic categorization, on the other hand, was obtained in both directions. We propose the Sense Model as a possible account of these findings.

KW - Bilingual lexical processing

KW - Bilingual lexicon

KW - Lexical decision

KW - Masked translation priming

KW - Semantic categorization

KW - Semantic priming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142712276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142712276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3142712276

VL - 51

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 1

ER -