The role of status in evaluating research: The case of data editing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cleaning and editing apparently illogical, or seemingly incorrect, data is a ubiquitous research practice. But a lack of formal guidance in this realm of research may promote reliance on colleagues' knowledge and on information from the situation at hand, such as status considerations. To investigate the extent to which status considerations influence sociological research practice, I conducted a survey-based experiment using hypothetical vignettes. A sample of sociologists was asked to respond to a hypothetical vignette depicting a researcher's encounter with apparently messy data and a proposed editing strategy. The vignettes controlled for all variables except one-the status of the hypothetical researcher-and one vignette was randomly assigned to each sociologist. I find that status considerations are relevant to sociological research. Researchers judge the same data cleaning strategy more stringently when a graduate student, rather than a professor, proposes the strategy. Implications of these findings for the objectivity and universality of sociological research practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-537
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

research practice
social research
sociologist
objectivity
university teacher
graduate
lack
experiment
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The role of status in evaluating research : The case of data editing. / Leahey, Erin E.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 521-537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c3d8d60e71940c484df07852c801784,
title = "The role of status in evaluating research: The case of data editing",
abstract = "Cleaning and editing apparently illogical, or seemingly incorrect, data is a ubiquitous research practice. But a lack of formal guidance in this realm of research may promote reliance on colleagues' knowledge and on information from the situation at hand, such as status considerations. To investigate the extent to which status considerations influence sociological research practice, I conducted a survey-based experiment using hypothetical vignettes. A sample of sociologists was asked to respond to a hypothetical vignette depicting a researcher's encounter with apparently messy data and a proposed editing strategy. The vignettes controlled for all variables except one-the status of the hypothetical researcher-and one vignette was randomly assigned to each sociologist. I find that status considerations are relevant to sociological research. Researchers judge the same data cleaning strategy more stringently when a graduate student, rather than a professor, proposes the strategy. Implications of these findings for the objectivity and universality of sociological research practice are discussed.",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "521--537",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of status in evaluating research

T2 - The case of data editing

AU - Leahey, Erin E

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Cleaning and editing apparently illogical, or seemingly incorrect, data is a ubiquitous research practice. But a lack of formal guidance in this realm of research may promote reliance on colleagues' knowledge and on information from the situation at hand, such as status considerations. To investigate the extent to which status considerations influence sociological research practice, I conducted a survey-based experiment using hypothetical vignettes. A sample of sociologists was asked to respond to a hypothetical vignette depicting a researcher's encounter with apparently messy data and a proposed editing strategy. The vignettes controlled for all variables except one-the status of the hypothetical researcher-and one vignette was randomly assigned to each sociologist. I find that status considerations are relevant to sociological research. Researchers judge the same data cleaning strategy more stringently when a graduate student, rather than a professor, proposes the strategy. Implications of these findings for the objectivity and universality of sociological research practice are discussed.

AB - Cleaning and editing apparently illogical, or seemingly incorrect, data is a ubiquitous research practice. But a lack of formal guidance in this realm of research may promote reliance on colleagues' knowledge and on information from the situation at hand, such as status considerations. To investigate the extent to which status considerations influence sociological research practice, I conducted a survey-based experiment using hypothetical vignettes. A sample of sociologists was asked to respond to a hypothetical vignette depicting a researcher's encounter with apparently messy data and a proposed editing strategy. The vignettes controlled for all variables except one-the status of the hypothetical researcher-and one vignette was randomly assigned to each sociologist. I find that status considerations are relevant to sociological research. Researchers judge the same data cleaning strategy more stringently when a graduate student, rather than a professor, proposes the strategy. Implications of these findings for the objectivity and universality of sociological research practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043121131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043121131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.09.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4043121131

VL - 33

SP - 521

EP - 537

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

IS - 3

ER -