The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships

James R. Brown, Anthony T. Cobb, Robert F Lusch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the impact of two forms of contracting (explicit and normative) and two kinds of fairness perceptions (distributive and procedural) on satisfaction and conflict within 433 wholesaler-supplier relationships. As predicted, normative contracting is associated with higher levels of channel member satisfaction and lower levels of conflict. Explicit contracting, however, was linked to higher levels of channel conflict. Distributive justice was positively associated with channel member satisfaction as was procedural justice, but only under conditions of high distributive justice - a surprising finding that ran counter to our predictions. As expected, we found that both distributive and procedural justice limited the extent of conflict in the channel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-175
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Contracts
Marketing
Conflict (Psychology)
Channel relationships
Marketing channels
Distributive justice
Contracting
Justice
Procedural justice

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Contracting
  • Justice
  • Marketing channels
  • Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships. / Brown, James R.; Cobb, Anthony T.; Lusch, Robert F.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 166-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{57a18655b4064446b7bbbe088b7215b8,
title = "The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships",
abstract = "This study explores the impact of two forms of contracting (explicit and normative) and two kinds of fairness perceptions (distributive and procedural) on satisfaction and conflict within 433 wholesaler-supplier relationships. As predicted, normative contracting is associated with higher levels of channel member satisfaction and lower levels of conflict. Explicit contracting, however, was linked to higher levels of channel conflict. Distributive justice was positively associated with channel member satisfaction as was procedural justice, but only under conditions of high distributive justice - a surprising finding that ran counter to our predictions. As expected, we found that both distributive and procedural justice limited the extent of conflict in the channel.",
keywords = "Conflict, Contracting, Justice, Marketing channels, Satisfaction",
author = "Brown, {James R.} and Cobb, {Anthony T.} and Lusch, {Robert F}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "166--175",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships

AU - Brown, James R.

AU - Cobb, Anthony T.

AU - Lusch, Robert F

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - This study explores the impact of two forms of contracting (explicit and normative) and two kinds of fairness perceptions (distributive and procedural) on satisfaction and conflict within 433 wholesaler-supplier relationships. As predicted, normative contracting is associated with higher levels of channel member satisfaction and lower levels of conflict. Explicit contracting, however, was linked to higher levels of channel conflict. Distributive justice was positively associated with channel member satisfaction as was procedural justice, but only under conditions of high distributive justice - a surprising finding that ran counter to our predictions. As expected, we found that both distributive and procedural justice limited the extent of conflict in the channel.

AB - This study explores the impact of two forms of contracting (explicit and normative) and two kinds of fairness perceptions (distributive and procedural) on satisfaction and conflict within 433 wholesaler-supplier relationships. As predicted, normative contracting is associated with higher levels of channel member satisfaction and lower levels of conflict. Explicit contracting, however, was linked to higher levels of channel conflict. Distributive justice was positively associated with channel member satisfaction as was procedural justice, but only under conditions of high distributive justice - a surprising finding that ran counter to our predictions. As expected, we found that both distributive and procedural justice limited the extent of conflict in the channel.

KW - Conflict

KW - Contracting

KW - Justice

KW - Marketing channels

KW - Satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344455325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344455325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:30344455325

VL - 59

SP - 166

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 2

ER -