The sample areas of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry probes

P. A. Ferré, J. H. Knight, D. L. Rudolph, R. G. Kachanoski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

136 Scopus citations

Abstract

We define the sample area in the plane perpendicular to the long axis of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes based on the finite element numerical analysis of Knight et al. [1997] and the definition of spatial sensitivity of Knight [1992]. The sample area of conventional two- and three-rod probes is controlled by the rod separation. Two-rod probes have a much larger sample area than three-rod designs. Low dielectric permittivity coatings on TDR rods greatly decrease the sample area. The sample area of coated rod probes decreases as the relative dielectric permittivity of the surrounding medium increases. Two alternative profiling probes were analyzed. The separation of the metal rods of Hook et al. [1992] probes controls the size of the sample area. Reducing the height or width of the rods improves the distribution of sensitivity within the sample area. The relative dielectric permittivity of the probe body does not affect the sample size. The sample size of the Redman and DeRyck [1994] probe is also controlled by the rod separation. Two alternative surface probe designs [White and Zegelin, 1992; Selker et al., 1993] are shown to have similar sample areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2971-2979
Number of pages9
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume34
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The sample areas of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry probes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this