The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers

Gregory S. Cooper, Zhong Yuan, Kurt C. Stange, Leslie K Dennis, Saeid B. Amini, Alfred A. Rimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Although Medicare claims data have been used to identify cases of cancer in older Americans, there are few data about their relative sensitivity. OBJECTIVES. To investigate the sensitivity of diagnostic and procedural coding for case ascertainment of breast, colorectal, endometrial, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. SUBJECTS. Three hundred and eighty nine thousand and two hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed with cancer between 1984 and 1993 resided in one of nine Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas. MEASURES. The sensitivity of inpatient and Part B diagnostic and cancer-specific procedural codes for case finding were compared with SEER. RESULTS. The sensitivity of inpatient and inpatient plus Part B claims for the corresponding cancer diagnosis was 77.4% and 91.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of inpatient claims alone was highest for colorectal (86.1%) and endometrial (84.1%) cancer and lowest for prostate cancer (63.6%). However, when Part B claims were included, the sensitivity for diagnosis of breast cancer was greater than for other cancers (93.6%). Inpatient claim sensitivity was highest for earlier years of the study, and, because of more complete data and longer follow up, the highest sensitivity of combined inpatient and Part B claims was achieved in the late 1980s or early 1990s. CONCLUSIONS. Medicare claims provide reasonably high sensitivity for the detection of cancer in the elderly, especially if inpatient and Part B claims are combined. Because the study did not measure other dimensions of accuracy, such as specificity and predictive value, the potential costs of including false positive cases need to be assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-444
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Care
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicare
Inpatients
cancer
Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Endometrial Neoplasms
Epidemiology
epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms
surveillance
diagnostic
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
coding
costs

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms
  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Endometrial neoplasms
  • Incidence
  • Lung neoplasms
  • Medicare
  • Pancreatic neoplasms
  • Prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers. / Cooper, Gregory S.; Yuan, Zhong; Stange, Kurt C.; Dennis, Leslie K; Amini, Saeid B.; Rimm, Alfred A.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 37, No. 5, 05.1999, p. 436-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooper, Gregory S. ; Yuan, Zhong ; Stange, Kurt C. ; Dennis, Leslie K ; Amini, Saeid B. ; Rimm, Alfred A. / The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers. In: Medical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 37, No. 5. pp. 436-444.
@article{35fd4e996d8343058a285e36fc463535,
title = "The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. Although Medicare claims data have been used to identify cases of cancer in older Americans, there are few data about their relative sensitivity. OBJECTIVES. To investigate the sensitivity of diagnostic and procedural coding for case ascertainment of breast, colorectal, endometrial, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. SUBJECTS. Three hundred and eighty nine thousand and two hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed with cancer between 1984 and 1993 resided in one of nine Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas. MEASURES. The sensitivity of inpatient and Part B diagnostic and cancer-specific procedural codes for case finding were compared with SEER. RESULTS. The sensitivity of inpatient and inpatient plus Part B claims for the corresponding cancer diagnosis was 77.4{\%} and 91.2{\%}, respectively. The sensitivity of inpatient claims alone was highest for colorectal (86.1{\%}) and endometrial (84.1{\%}) cancer and lowest for prostate cancer (63.6{\%}). However, when Part B claims were included, the sensitivity for diagnosis of breast cancer was greater than for other cancers (93.6{\%}). Inpatient claim sensitivity was highest for earlier years of the study, and, because of more complete data and longer follow up, the highest sensitivity of combined inpatient and Part B claims was achieved in the late 1980s or early 1990s. CONCLUSIONS. Medicare claims provide reasonably high sensitivity for the detection of cancer in the elderly, especially if inpatient and Part B claims are combined. Because the study did not measure other dimensions of accuracy, such as specificity and predictive value, the potential costs of including false positive cases need to be assessed.",
keywords = "Breast neoplasms, Colorectal neoplasms, Endometrial neoplasms, Incidence, Lung neoplasms, Medicare, Pancreatic neoplasms, Prostatic neoplasms",
author = "Cooper, {Gregory S.} and Zhong Yuan and Stange, {Kurt C.} and Dennis, {Leslie K} and Amini, {Saeid B.} and Rimm, {Alfred A.}",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/00005650-199905000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "436--444",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Sensitivity of Medicare Claims Data for Case Ascertainment of Six Common Cancers

AU - Cooper, Gregory S.

AU - Yuan, Zhong

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

AU - Dennis, Leslie K

AU - Amini, Saeid B.

AU - Rimm, Alfred A.

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - BACKGROUND. Although Medicare claims data have been used to identify cases of cancer in older Americans, there are few data about their relative sensitivity. OBJECTIVES. To investigate the sensitivity of diagnostic and procedural coding for case ascertainment of breast, colorectal, endometrial, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. SUBJECTS. Three hundred and eighty nine thousand and two hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed with cancer between 1984 and 1993 resided in one of nine Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas. MEASURES. The sensitivity of inpatient and Part B diagnostic and cancer-specific procedural codes for case finding were compared with SEER. RESULTS. The sensitivity of inpatient and inpatient plus Part B claims for the corresponding cancer diagnosis was 77.4% and 91.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of inpatient claims alone was highest for colorectal (86.1%) and endometrial (84.1%) cancer and lowest for prostate cancer (63.6%). However, when Part B claims were included, the sensitivity for diagnosis of breast cancer was greater than for other cancers (93.6%). Inpatient claim sensitivity was highest for earlier years of the study, and, because of more complete data and longer follow up, the highest sensitivity of combined inpatient and Part B claims was achieved in the late 1980s or early 1990s. CONCLUSIONS. Medicare claims provide reasonably high sensitivity for the detection of cancer in the elderly, especially if inpatient and Part B claims are combined. Because the study did not measure other dimensions of accuracy, such as specificity and predictive value, the potential costs of including false positive cases need to be assessed.

AB - BACKGROUND. Although Medicare claims data have been used to identify cases of cancer in older Americans, there are few data about their relative sensitivity. OBJECTIVES. To investigate the sensitivity of diagnostic and procedural coding for case ascertainment of breast, colorectal, endometrial, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. SUBJECTS. Three hundred and eighty nine thousand and two hundred and thirty-six patients diagnosed with cancer between 1984 and 1993 resided in one of nine Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas. MEASURES. The sensitivity of inpatient and Part B diagnostic and cancer-specific procedural codes for case finding were compared with SEER. RESULTS. The sensitivity of inpatient and inpatient plus Part B claims for the corresponding cancer diagnosis was 77.4% and 91.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of inpatient claims alone was highest for colorectal (86.1%) and endometrial (84.1%) cancer and lowest for prostate cancer (63.6%). However, when Part B claims were included, the sensitivity for diagnosis of breast cancer was greater than for other cancers (93.6%). Inpatient claim sensitivity was highest for earlier years of the study, and, because of more complete data and longer follow up, the highest sensitivity of combined inpatient and Part B claims was achieved in the late 1980s or early 1990s. CONCLUSIONS. Medicare claims provide reasonably high sensitivity for the detection of cancer in the elderly, especially if inpatient and Part B claims are combined. Because the study did not measure other dimensions of accuracy, such as specificity and predictive value, the potential costs of including false positive cases need to be assessed.

KW - Breast neoplasms

KW - Colorectal neoplasms

KW - Endometrial neoplasms

KW - Incidence

KW - Lung neoplasms

KW - Medicare

KW - Pancreatic neoplasms

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033129671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033129671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00003

M3 - Article

C2 - 10335746

AN - SCOPUS:0033129671

VL - 37

SP - 436

EP - 444

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 5

ER -