The SER Standards: a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al.

George D. Gann, Tein McDonald, James Aronson, Kingsley W. Dixon, Bethanie Walder, James G. Hallett, Kris Decleer, Donald Falk, Emily K. Gonzales, Carolina Murcia, Cara R. Nelson, Alan J. Unwin

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to a critique by Higgs et al., this article clarifies the content and intent of the Society for Ecological Restoration's (SER) International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration. Higgs et al. expressed concern that the SER Standards are not sufficiently underpinned by principles and risk disenfranchising some practitioners by narrowing what qualifies as ecological restoration. To demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded, we discuss the policy context and principles on which the Standards are based, its organizational structure, the innovative and inclusive approach used for development, and highlight significant errata by Higgs et al.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-430
Number of pages5
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
restoration

Keywords

  • ecological restoration targets
  • global restoration policy
  • reference ecosystems
  • restoration principles
  • restoration standards
  • restorative continuum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Aronson, J., Dixon, K. W., Walder, B., Hallett, J. G., ... Unwin, A. J. (2018). The SER Standards: a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al. Restoration Ecology, 26(3), 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12819

The SER Standards : a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al. / Gann, George D.; McDonald, Tein; Aronson, James; Dixon, Kingsley W.; Walder, Bethanie; Hallett, James G.; Decleer, Kris; Falk, Donald; Gonzales, Emily K.; Murcia, Carolina; Nelson, Cara R.; Unwin, Alan J.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 426-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Gann, GD, McDonald, T, Aronson, J, Dixon, KW, Walder, B, Hallett, JG, Decleer, K, Falk, D, Gonzales, EK, Murcia, C, Nelson, CR & Unwin, AJ 2018, 'The SER Standards: a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al.', Restoration Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12819
Gann, George D. ; McDonald, Tein ; Aronson, James ; Dixon, Kingsley W. ; Walder, Bethanie ; Hallett, James G. ; Decleer, Kris ; Falk, Donald ; Gonzales, Emily K. ; Murcia, Carolina ; Nelson, Cara R. ; Unwin, Alan J. / The SER Standards : a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al. In: Restoration Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 426-430.
@article{adc1ab61652849d59370c2c2b08f0d1e,
title = "The SER Standards: a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al.",
abstract = "In response to a critique by Higgs et al., this article clarifies the content and intent of the Society for Ecological Restoration's (SER) International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration. Higgs et al. expressed concern that the SER Standards are not sufficiently underpinned by principles and risk disenfranchising some practitioners by narrowing what qualifies as ecological restoration. To demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded, we discuss the policy context and principles on which the Standards are based, its organizational structure, the innovative and inclusive approach used for development, and highlight significant errata by Higgs et al.",
keywords = "ecological restoration targets, global restoration policy, reference ecosystems, restoration principles, restoration standards, restorative continuum",
author = "Gann, {George D.} and Tein McDonald and James Aronson and Dixon, {Kingsley W.} and Bethanie Walder and Hallett, {James G.} and Kris Decleer and Donald Falk and Gonzales, {Emily K.} and Carolina Murcia and Nelson, {Cara R.} and Unwin, {Alan J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rec.12819",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "426--430",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The SER Standards

T2 - a globally relevant and inclusive tool for improving restoration practice—a reply to Higgs et al.

AU - Gann, George D.

AU - McDonald, Tein

AU - Aronson, James

AU - Dixon, Kingsley W.

AU - Walder, Bethanie

AU - Hallett, James G.

AU - Decleer, Kris

AU - Falk, Donald

AU - Gonzales, Emily K.

AU - Murcia, Carolina

AU - Nelson, Cara R.

AU - Unwin, Alan J.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - In response to a critique by Higgs et al., this article clarifies the content and intent of the Society for Ecological Restoration's (SER) International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration. Higgs et al. expressed concern that the SER Standards are not sufficiently underpinned by principles and risk disenfranchising some practitioners by narrowing what qualifies as ecological restoration. To demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded, we discuss the policy context and principles on which the Standards are based, its organizational structure, the innovative and inclusive approach used for development, and highlight significant errata by Higgs et al.

AB - In response to a critique by Higgs et al., this article clarifies the content and intent of the Society for Ecological Restoration's (SER) International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration. Higgs et al. expressed concern that the SER Standards are not sufficiently underpinned by principles and risk disenfranchising some practitioners by narrowing what qualifies as ecological restoration. To demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded, we discuss the policy context and principles on which the Standards are based, its organizational structure, the innovative and inclusive approach used for development, and highlight significant errata by Higgs et al.

KW - ecological restoration targets

KW - global restoration policy

KW - reference ecosystems

KW - restoration principles

KW - restoration standards

KW - restorative continuum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048089462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048089462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.12819

DO - 10.1111/rec.12819

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:85048089462

VL - 26

SP - 426

EP - 430

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 3

ER -