The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections

a cadaveric, anatomic study

Carmine Zoccali, Jesse Skoch, Apar Patel, Christina M. Walter, Philip Maykowski, Mhd-Ali - Baaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Pelvic and sacral surgeries are considered technically difficult due to the complex multidimensional anatomy and the presence of significant neurovascular structures. Knowledge of the key neurovascular anatomy is essential for safe and effective execution of partial and complete sacral resections. The goal of this anatomic, cadaveric study is to describe the pertinent neurovascular anatomy during these procedures. Methods: Three embalmed human cadaveric specimens were used. Sacrectomies and sacroiliac joint resections were simulated and the structures at risk were identified. Both anterior and posterior approaches were evaluated. Results: During sacroiliac joint resection, L5 nerve roots are at high risk for iatrogenic injury; the vasculatures at greatest risk are the common iliac vessels and internal iliac vessels with L5–S1 and S1–S2 high sacrectomies. Minor bleeding risk is associated with S2–S3 osteotomy because of the potential to damage superior gluteal vessels. S3–S4 osteotomy presents a low risk of bleeding. Adjacent nerve roots proximal to the resection level are at high risk during higher sacrectomies. Conclusions: Several sacrectomy techniques are available and selection often depends on the specific case and surgeon preference; nevertheless, anatomic knowledge is extremely important. Considering the highly variable anatomic relations of the vascular bundles, a preoperative evaluation with CT or MRI with vascular reconstruction may be helpful to decrease bleeding risk by preemptively binding the internal iliac vessels in cases where higher tumors are present. To decrease the risk of damaging nerve roots, it is recommended to perform the resection as close to the involved foramina as possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1109-1113
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 7 2015

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Sacroiliac Joint
Hemorrhage
Osteotomy
Blood Vessels
Wounds and Injuries
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bleeding
  • Chordoma
  • Rectal cancer
  • Sacral nerve roots
  • Sacrectomy
  • Sacroiliac joint resection
  • Surgical complication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections : a cadaveric, anatomic study. / Zoccali, Carmine; Skoch, Jesse; Patel, Apar; Walter, Christina M.; Maykowski, Philip; Baaj, Mhd-Ali -.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 24, No. 5, 07.05.2015, p. 1109-1113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zoccali, Carmine ; Skoch, Jesse ; Patel, Apar ; Walter, Christina M. ; Maykowski, Philip ; Baaj, Mhd-Ali -. / The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections : a cadaveric, anatomic study. In: European Spine Journal. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 1109-1113.
@article{a842c24ecf014e08ab011fc248787cf3,
title = "The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections: a cadaveric, anatomic study",
abstract = "Purpose: Pelvic and sacral surgeries are considered technically difficult due to the complex multidimensional anatomy and the presence of significant neurovascular structures. Knowledge of the key neurovascular anatomy is essential for safe and effective execution of partial and complete sacral resections. The goal of this anatomic, cadaveric study is to describe the pertinent neurovascular anatomy during these procedures. Methods: Three embalmed human cadaveric specimens were used. Sacrectomies and sacroiliac joint resections were simulated and the structures at risk were identified. Both anterior and posterior approaches were evaluated. Results: During sacroiliac joint resection, L5 nerve roots are at high risk for iatrogenic injury; the vasculatures at greatest risk are the common iliac vessels and internal iliac vessels with L5–S1 and S1–S2 high sacrectomies. Minor bleeding risk is associated with S2–S3 osteotomy because of the potential to damage superior gluteal vessels. S3–S4 osteotomy presents a low risk of bleeding. Adjacent nerve roots proximal to the resection level are at high risk during higher sacrectomies. Conclusions: Several sacrectomy techniques are available and selection often depends on the specific case and surgeon preference; nevertheless, anatomic knowledge is extremely important. Considering the highly variable anatomic relations of the vascular bundles, a preoperative evaluation with CT or MRI with vascular reconstruction may be helpful to decrease bleeding risk by preemptively binding the internal iliac vessels in cases where higher tumors are present. To decrease the risk of damaging nerve roots, it is recommended to perform the resection as close to the involved foramina as possible.",
keywords = "Bleeding, Chordoma, Rectal cancer, Sacral nerve roots, Sacrectomy, Sacroiliac joint resection, Surgical complication",
author = "Carmine Zoccali and Jesse Skoch and Apar Patel and Walter, {Christina M.} and Philip Maykowski and Baaj, {Mhd-Ali -}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-015-3815-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1109--1113",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections

T2 - a cadaveric, anatomic study

AU - Zoccali, Carmine

AU - Skoch, Jesse

AU - Patel, Apar

AU - Walter, Christina M.

AU - Maykowski, Philip

AU - Baaj, Mhd-Ali -

PY - 2015/5/7

Y1 - 2015/5/7

N2 - Purpose: Pelvic and sacral surgeries are considered technically difficult due to the complex multidimensional anatomy and the presence of significant neurovascular structures. Knowledge of the key neurovascular anatomy is essential for safe and effective execution of partial and complete sacral resections. The goal of this anatomic, cadaveric study is to describe the pertinent neurovascular anatomy during these procedures. Methods: Three embalmed human cadaveric specimens were used. Sacrectomies and sacroiliac joint resections were simulated and the structures at risk were identified. Both anterior and posterior approaches were evaluated. Results: During sacroiliac joint resection, L5 nerve roots are at high risk for iatrogenic injury; the vasculatures at greatest risk are the common iliac vessels and internal iliac vessels with L5–S1 and S1–S2 high sacrectomies. Minor bleeding risk is associated with S2–S3 osteotomy because of the potential to damage superior gluteal vessels. S3–S4 osteotomy presents a low risk of bleeding. Adjacent nerve roots proximal to the resection level are at high risk during higher sacrectomies. Conclusions: Several sacrectomy techniques are available and selection often depends on the specific case and surgeon preference; nevertheless, anatomic knowledge is extremely important. Considering the highly variable anatomic relations of the vascular bundles, a preoperative evaluation with CT or MRI with vascular reconstruction may be helpful to decrease bleeding risk by preemptively binding the internal iliac vessels in cases where higher tumors are present. To decrease the risk of damaging nerve roots, it is recommended to perform the resection as close to the involved foramina as possible.

AB - Purpose: Pelvic and sacral surgeries are considered technically difficult due to the complex multidimensional anatomy and the presence of significant neurovascular structures. Knowledge of the key neurovascular anatomy is essential for safe and effective execution of partial and complete sacral resections. The goal of this anatomic, cadaveric study is to describe the pertinent neurovascular anatomy during these procedures. Methods: Three embalmed human cadaveric specimens were used. Sacrectomies and sacroiliac joint resections were simulated and the structures at risk were identified. Both anterior and posterior approaches were evaluated. Results: During sacroiliac joint resection, L5 nerve roots are at high risk for iatrogenic injury; the vasculatures at greatest risk are the common iliac vessels and internal iliac vessels with L5–S1 and S1–S2 high sacrectomies. Minor bleeding risk is associated with S2–S3 osteotomy because of the potential to damage superior gluteal vessels. S3–S4 osteotomy presents a low risk of bleeding. Adjacent nerve roots proximal to the resection level are at high risk during higher sacrectomies. Conclusions: Several sacrectomy techniques are available and selection often depends on the specific case and surgeon preference; nevertheless, anatomic knowledge is extremely important. Considering the highly variable anatomic relations of the vascular bundles, a preoperative evaluation with CT or MRI with vascular reconstruction may be helpful to decrease bleeding risk by preemptively binding the internal iliac vessels in cases where higher tumors are present. To decrease the risk of damaging nerve roots, it is recommended to perform the resection as close to the involved foramina as possible.

KW - Bleeding

KW - Chordoma

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Sacral nerve roots

KW - Sacrectomy

KW - Sacroiliac joint resection

KW - Surgical complication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939994672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939994672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-015-3815-3

DO - 10.1007/s00586-015-3815-3

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1109

EP - 1113

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 5

ER -