The tails of justice: A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Justice experiences are proposed to demonstrate a normal distribution with very fair and very unfair experiences being relatively rare and the majority of experiences in the middle of the distribution. Further, it is the extreme experiences of unfairness and fairness that are most important in shaping behavioral reactions to fairness. The reliance on traditional Likert-type measures to assess organizational justice constructs and use of linear correlation-based statistics has limited the opportunity to observe these effects. Two proposals for developing new measures that could enhance our understanding of the tails of justice distributions include: (a) develop a zone of tolerance model to assess violations and "more than fair" tails of the fairness distribution and (b) examine baseline levels of fairness and the influence of these baselines on reactions to specific justice events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-281
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Normal Distribution
Justice
Organizational justice
Dimensionality
Fairness

Keywords

  • Organizational justice
  • Unfairness
  • Violations
  • Zone of tolerance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{ad4ee47533494f4b9b60e6d7c8f0637f,
title = "The tails of justice: A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs",
abstract = "Justice experiences are proposed to demonstrate a normal distribution with very fair and very unfair experiences being relatively rare and the majority of experiences in the middle of the distribution. Further, it is the extreme experiences of unfairness and fairness that are most important in shaping behavioral reactions to fairness. The reliance on traditional Likert-type measures to assess organizational justice constructs and use of linear correlation-based statistics has limited the opportunity to observe these effects. Two proposals for developing new measures that could enhance our understanding of the tails of justice distributions include: (a) develop a zone of tolerance model to assess violations and {"}more than fair{"} tails of the fairness distribution and (b) examine baseline levels of fairness and the influence of these baselines on reactions to specific justice events.",
keywords = "Organizational justice, Unfairness, Violations, Zone of tolerance",
author = "Gilliland, {Stephen W}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "271--281",
journal = "Human Resource Management Review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The tails of justice

T2 - A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Justice experiences are proposed to demonstrate a normal distribution with very fair and very unfair experiences being relatively rare and the majority of experiences in the middle of the distribution. Further, it is the extreme experiences of unfairness and fairness that are most important in shaping behavioral reactions to fairness. The reliance on traditional Likert-type measures to assess organizational justice constructs and use of linear correlation-based statistics has limited the opportunity to observe these effects. Two proposals for developing new measures that could enhance our understanding of the tails of justice distributions include: (a) develop a zone of tolerance model to assess violations and "more than fair" tails of the fairness distribution and (b) examine baseline levels of fairness and the influence of these baselines on reactions to specific justice events.

AB - Justice experiences are proposed to demonstrate a normal distribution with very fair and very unfair experiences being relatively rare and the majority of experiences in the middle of the distribution. Further, it is the extreme experiences of unfairness and fairness that are most important in shaping behavioral reactions to fairness. The reliance on traditional Likert-type measures to assess organizational justice constructs and use of linear correlation-based statistics has limited the opportunity to observe these effects. Two proposals for developing new measures that could enhance our understanding of the tails of justice distributions include: (a) develop a zone of tolerance model to assess violations and "more than fair" tails of the fairness distribution and (b) examine baseline levels of fairness and the influence of these baselines on reactions to specific justice events.

KW - Organizational justice

KW - Unfairness

KW - Violations

KW - Zone of tolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53849130618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53849130618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.08.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:53849130618

VL - 18

SP - 271

EP - 281

JO - Human Resource Management Review

JF - Human Resource Management Review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 4

ER -