THE TOKEN ECONOMY: AN EVALUATIVE REVIEW

Alan E. Kazdin, Richard R Bootzin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

282 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Token economies have been applied in a wide range of settings. While there are several advantages to the use of this procedure, there are obstacles that may impede its implementation and therapeutic efficacy. These include: staff training, client resistance, circumvention of the contingencies, and non‐responsiveness of subjects. Studies employing token programs with psychiatric patients, retardates, children in classroom settings, delinquents, and autistic children are reviewed. Although token economies are successful while in operation, the issue of generalization of behavior gains or resistance to extinction has not been given careful consideration. Inasmuch as generalization is perhaps the most crucial issue, several procedures are presented that are designed to facilitate maintenance of performance when reinforcement is withdrawn. Methodological suggestions for investigations on token reinforcement in applied settings are presented. 1972 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-372
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1972
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Token Economy
reinforcement
economy
contingency
Resistance Training
staff
classroom
Psychiatry
Maintenance
performance
Economy
Reinforcement
Generalization (Psychology)
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

THE TOKEN ECONOMY : AN EVALUATIVE REVIEW. / Kazdin, Alan E.; Bootzin, Richard R.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1972, p. 343-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{26ee4b2d453c4e4192d19fcba2f14448,
title = "THE TOKEN ECONOMY: AN EVALUATIVE REVIEW",
abstract = "Token economies have been applied in a wide range of settings. While there are several advantages to the use of this procedure, there are obstacles that may impede its implementation and therapeutic efficacy. These include: staff training, client resistance, circumvention of the contingencies, and non‐responsiveness of subjects. Studies employing token programs with psychiatric patients, retardates, children in classroom settings, delinquents, and autistic children are reviewed. Although token economies are successful while in operation, the issue of generalization of behavior gains or resistance to extinction has not been given careful consideration. Inasmuch as generalization is perhaps the most crucial issue, several procedures are presented that are designed to facilitate maintenance of performance when reinforcement is withdrawn. Methodological suggestions for investigations on token reinforcement in applied settings are presented. 1972 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior",
author = "Kazdin, {Alan E.} and Bootzin, {Richard R}",
year = "1972",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1972.5-343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "343--372",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE TOKEN ECONOMY

T2 - AN EVALUATIVE REVIEW

AU - Kazdin, Alan E.

AU - Bootzin, Richard R

PY - 1972

Y1 - 1972

N2 - Token economies have been applied in a wide range of settings. While there are several advantages to the use of this procedure, there are obstacles that may impede its implementation and therapeutic efficacy. These include: staff training, client resistance, circumvention of the contingencies, and non‐responsiveness of subjects. Studies employing token programs with psychiatric patients, retardates, children in classroom settings, delinquents, and autistic children are reviewed. Although token economies are successful while in operation, the issue of generalization of behavior gains or resistance to extinction has not been given careful consideration. Inasmuch as generalization is perhaps the most crucial issue, several procedures are presented that are designed to facilitate maintenance of performance when reinforcement is withdrawn. Methodological suggestions for investigations on token reinforcement in applied settings are presented. 1972 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

AB - Token economies have been applied in a wide range of settings. While there are several advantages to the use of this procedure, there are obstacles that may impede its implementation and therapeutic efficacy. These include: staff training, client resistance, circumvention of the contingencies, and non‐responsiveness of subjects. Studies employing token programs with psychiatric patients, retardates, children in classroom settings, delinquents, and autistic children are reviewed. Although token economies are successful while in operation, the issue of generalization of behavior gains or resistance to extinction has not been given careful consideration. Inasmuch as generalization is perhaps the most crucial issue, several procedures are presented that are designed to facilitate maintenance of performance when reinforcement is withdrawn. Methodological suggestions for investigations on token reinforcement in applied settings are presented. 1972 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980221459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980221459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-343

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-343

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84980221459

VL - 5

SP - 343

EP - 372

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -