The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation

Regina J Deil-Amen, James E. Rosenbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social stratification may emerge within efforts to reduce it. Although open admissions policies increase access to college, many students may not really be college students; they are taking noncredit remedial courses, which raises concerns about stigma and "cooled-out" aspirations. Studying two community colleges, this article describes a remedial approach that avoids stigma and cooling out but creates unintended consequences. Analyses of interviews with staff and students and of institutional procedures show how this approach arises. The analyses also indicate how this approach inhibits and delays students' awareness of their remedial status, causes them to misjudge their prospects, and prevents them from considering alternative options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-268
Number of pages20
JournalSociology of Education
Volume75
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

student
social stratification
staff
cause
interview
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation. / Deil-Amen, Regina J; Rosenbaum, James E.

In: Sociology of Education, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2002, p. 249-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deil-Amen, Regina J ; Rosenbaum, James E. / The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation. In: Sociology of Education. 2002 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 249-268.
@article{1ea6cf3dd3e740028f5027c169958a9d,
title = "The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation",
abstract = "Social stratification may emerge within efforts to reduce it. Although open admissions policies increase access to college, many students may not really be college students; they are taking noncredit remedial courses, which raises concerns about stigma and {"}cooled-out{"} aspirations. Studying two community colleges, this article describes a remedial approach that avoids stigma and cooling out but creates unintended consequences. Analyses of interviews with staff and students and of institutional procedures show how this approach arises. The analyses also indicate how this approach inhibits and delays students' awareness of their remedial status, causes them to misjudge their prospects, and prevents them from considering alternative options.",
author = "Deil-Amen, {Regina J} and Rosenbaum, {James E.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "249--268",
journal = "Sociology of Education",
issn = "0038-0407",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation

AU - Deil-Amen, Regina J

AU - Rosenbaum, James E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Social stratification may emerge within efforts to reduce it. Although open admissions policies increase access to college, many students may not really be college students; they are taking noncredit remedial courses, which raises concerns about stigma and "cooled-out" aspirations. Studying two community colleges, this article describes a remedial approach that avoids stigma and cooling out but creates unintended consequences. Analyses of interviews with staff and students and of institutional procedures show how this approach arises. The analyses also indicate how this approach inhibits and delays students' awareness of their remedial status, causes them to misjudge their prospects, and prevents them from considering alternative options.

AB - Social stratification may emerge within efforts to reduce it. Although open admissions policies increase access to college, many students may not really be college students; they are taking noncredit remedial courses, which raises concerns about stigma and "cooled-out" aspirations. Studying two community colleges, this article describes a remedial approach that avoids stigma and cooling out but creates unintended consequences. Analyses of interviews with staff and students and of institutional procedures show how this approach arises. The analyses also indicate how this approach inhibits and delays students' awareness of their remedial status, causes them to misjudge their prospects, and prevents them from considering alternative options.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036054597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036054597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 249

EP - 268

JO - Sociology of Education

JF - Sociology of Education

SN - 0038-0407

IS - 3

ER -