The United Nations, international peacekeeping and the question of ‘impartiality’: Revisiting the Congo operation of 1960

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper analyses peacekeeping impartiality, i.e. the extent to which peacekeepers act in the interests of international peace and security, rather than the interests of specific states or other external actors. It reevaluates the question of impartiality through an analysis of the Congo operation of July-September 1960. This case study was selected because it was by far the most important instance of peacekeeping during the Cold War. Based upon primary source materials from US, British, and UN archives, as well as memoirs and secondary sources, it finds that the Congo peacekeeping force intervened to a considerable extent in the internal politics of the Congo; in doing so, the peacekeepers collaborated with US policymakers and, to some extent, advanced their strategic objectives. A comparison between the Congo operation and recent cases of peacekeeping in post-Cold War Africa indicates that impartiality is likely to remain an elusive goal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-382
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Modern African Studies
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The United Nations, international peacekeeping and the question of ‘impartiality’: Revisiting the Congo operation of 1960'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this