The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma

Yvonne D. Senturia, Laurie J. Bauman, Yvonne M. Coyle, Wayne J Morgan, David L. Rosenstreich, Maryse D. Roudier, Herman Mitchell, Rebecca Gruchalla, Ellen F. Crain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To determine the accuracy of parent report and the accuracy of the medical record in documenting physician performance of elements of pediatric asthma care in the primary care setting. Methods. - A convenience sample of 79 English-speaking parents of 4-12-year old children with asthma presenting to medical center-affiliated inner-city primary care pediatric clinics in the Bronx, Dallas, and Chicago was enrolled, and the office visit was audiotaped. Parents were interviewed 1-16 days after the visit by telephone. Outcome Measures. - Accuracy of parent report was the primary outcome. The "reference standard" was an independent evaluation of the audiotaped record of the primary care visit. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was used as a guide to select data elements to assess quality of pediatric asthma care during primary care visits. Results. - Sufficient documentation was significantly (P < .001) less likely to be present in the medical record than in the follow-up interview for each element of care. When these elements were combined into a cumulative score, 71% of parent interviews but only 37% of medical records scored ≥5 (out of a possible 6), with 29% of medical records scoring ≤3. Parents were able to accurately report (concordance of parent data with audiotape reference standard) whether or not the visit had included performance of 5 of the 6 elements of care. Conclusions. - Our study suggests that parent telephone interview within 2 weeks after the visit is more accurate than the medical record for documentation of the quality of asthma care in pediatric primary care visits. The medical record was not sufficient to assess the quality of primary care related to asthma, primarily because of missing data. Therefore, our data suggest that assessing quality of care using the medical record will not only bias the findings in the direction of more deficient care but will also make improvement in care more difficult. Further validation of our strategy for using parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits will require its application in a variety of other primary care settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-200
Number of pages7
JournalAmbulatory Pediatrics
Volume1
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2001

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Primary Health Care
Asthma
Medical Records
Pediatrics
Parents
Interviews
Documentation
Tape Recording
Office Visits
Telephone
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians
Education

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Pediatric
  • Quality of care
  • Recall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Senturia, Y. D., Bauman, L. J., Coyle, Y. M., Morgan, W. J., Rosenstreich, D. L., Roudier, M. D., ... Crain, E. F. (2001). The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1(4), 194-200.

The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma. / Senturia, Yvonne D.; Bauman, Laurie J.; Coyle, Yvonne M.; Morgan, Wayne J; Rosenstreich, David L.; Roudier, Maryse D.; Mitchell, Herman; Gruchalla, Rebecca; Crain, Ellen F.

In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 1, No. 4, 07.2001, p. 194-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Senturia, YD, Bauman, LJ, Coyle, YM, Morgan, WJ, Rosenstreich, DL, Roudier, MD, Mitchell, H, Gruchalla, R & Crain, EF 2001, 'The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma', Ambulatory Pediatrics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 194-200.
Senturia YD, Bauman LJ, Coyle YM, Morgan WJ, Rosenstreich DL, Roudier MD et al. The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;1(4):194-200.
Senturia, Yvonne D. ; Bauman, Laurie J. ; Coyle, Yvonne M. ; Morgan, Wayne J ; Rosenstreich, David L. ; Roudier, Maryse D. ; Mitchell, Herman ; Gruchalla, Rebecca ; Crain, Ellen F. / The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma. In: Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2001 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 194-200.
@article{66c44e0bf4b24b52bd0d68eeefec3784,
title = "The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma",
abstract = "Objective. - To determine the accuracy of parent report and the accuracy of the medical record in documenting physician performance of elements of pediatric asthma care in the primary care setting. Methods. - A convenience sample of 79 English-speaking parents of 4-12-year old children with asthma presenting to medical center-affiliated inner-city primary care pediatric clinics in the Bronx, Dallas, and Chicago was enrolled, and the office visit was audiotaped. Parents were interviewed 1-16 days after the visit by telephone. Outcome Measures. - Accuracy of parent report was the primary outcome. The {"}reference standard{"} was an independent evaluation of the audiotaped record of the primary care visit. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was used as a guide to select data elements to assess quality of pediatric asthma care during primary care visits. Results. - Sufficient documentation was significantly (P < .001) less likely to be present in the medical record than in the follow-up interview for each element of care. When these elements were combined into a cumulative score, 71{\%} of parent interviews but only 37{\%} of medical records scored ≥5 (out of a possible 6), with 29{\%} of medical records scoring ≤3. Parents were able to accurately report (concordance of parent data with audiotape reference standard) whether or not the visit had included performance of 5 of the 6 elements of care. Conclusions. - Our study suggests that parent telephone interview within 2 weeks after the visit is more accurate than the medical record for documentation of the quality of asthma care in pediatric primary care visits. The medical record was not sufficient to assess the quality of primary care related to asthma, primarily because of missing data. Therefore, our data suggest that assessing quality of care using the medical record will not only bias the findings in the direction of more deficient care but will also make improvement in care more difficult. Further validation of our strategy for using parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits will require its application in a variety of other primary care settings.",
keywords = "Asthma, Pediatric, Quality of care, Recall",
author = "Senturia, {Yvonne D.} and Bauman, {Laurie J.} and Coyle, {Yvonne M.} and Morgan, {Wayne J} and Rosenstreich, {David L.} and Roudier, {Maryse D.} and Herman Mitchell and Rebecca Gruchalla and Crain, {Ellen F.}",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "194--200",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits among children with asthma

AU - Senturia, Yvonne D.

AU - Bauman, Laurie J.

AU - Coyle, Yvonne M.

AU - Morgan, Wayne J

AU - Rosenstreich, David L.

AU - Roudier, Maryse D.

AU - Mitchell, Herman

AU - Gruchalla, Rebecca

AU - Crain, Ellen F.

PY - 2001/7

Y1 - 2001/7

N2 - Objective. - To determine the accuracy of parent report and the accuracy of the medical record in documenting physician performance of elements of pediatric asthma care in the primary care setting. Methods. - A convenience sample of 79 English-speaking parents of 4-12-year old children with asthma presenting to medical center-affiliated inner-city primary care pediatric clinics in the Bronx, Dallas, and Chicago was enrolled, and the office visit was audiotaped. Parents were interviewed 1-16 days after the visit by telephone. Outcome Measures. - Accuracy of parent report was the primary outcome. The "reference standard" was an independent evaluation of the audiotaped record of the primary care visit. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was used as a guide to select data elements to assess quality of pediatric asthma care during primary care visits. Results. - Sufficient documentation was significantly (P < .001) less likely to be present in the medical record than in the follow-up interview for each element of care. When these elements were combined into a cumulative score, 71% of parent interviews but only 37% of medical records scored ≥5 (out of a possible 6), with 29% of medical records scoring ≤3. Parents were able to accurately report (concordance of parent data with audiotape reference standard) whether or not the visit had included performance of 5 of the 6 elements of care. Conclusions. - Our study suggests that parent telephone interview within 2 weeks after the visit is more accurate than the medical record for documentation of the quality of asthma care in pediatric primary care visits. The medical record was not sufficient to assess the quality of primary care related to asthma, primarily because of missing data. Therefore, our data suggest that assessing quality of care using the medical record will not only bias the findings in the direction of more deficient care but will also make improvement in care more difficult. Further validation of our strategy for using parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits will require its application in a variety of other primary care settings.

AB - Objective. - To determine the accuracy of parent report and the accuracy of the medical record in documenting physician performance of elements of pediatric asthma care in the primary care setting. Methods. - A convenience sample of 79 English-speaking parents of 4-12-year old children with asthma presenting to medical center-affiliated inner-city primary care pediatric clinics in the Bronx, Dallas, and Chicago was enrolled, and the office visit was audiotaped. Parents were interviewed 1-16 days after the visit by telephone. Outcome Measures. - Accuracy of parent report was the primary outcome. The "reference standard" was an independent evaluation of the audiotaped record of the primary care visit. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was used as a guide to select data elements to assess quality of pediatric asthma care during primary care visits. Results. - Sufficient documentation was significantly (P < .001) less likely to be present in the medical record than in the follow-up interview for each element of care. When these elements were combined into a cumulative score, 71% of parent interviews but only 37% of medical records scored ≥5 (out of a possible 6), with 29% of medical records scoring ≤3. Parents were able to accurately report (concordance of parent data with audiotape reference standard) whether or not the visit had included performance of 5 of the 6 elements of care. Conclusions. - Our study suggests that parent telephone interview within 2 weeks after the visit is more accurate than the medical record for documentation of the quality of asthma care in pediatric primary care visits. The medical record was not sufficient to assess the quality of primary care related to asthma, primarily because of missing data. Therefore, our data suggest that assessing quality of care using the medical record will not only bias the findings in the direction of more deficient care but will also make improvement in care more difficult. Further validation of our strategy for using parent report to assess the quality of care in primary care visits will require its application in a variety of other primary care settings.

KW - Asthma

KW - Pediatric

KW - Quality of care

KW - Recall

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035411503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035411503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11888400

AN - SCOPUS:0035411503

VL - 1

SP - 194

EP - 200

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 4

ER -