The u.s.–mexican border environment cooperation commission: Collected perspectives on the first two years

Robert G Varady, David Colnic, Robert Merideth, Terry Sprouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article assesses the first two years’ activities of the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC), and synthesizes the invited commentary from several BECC observers along both sides of the border. As a framework for assessment, the paper delineates several key elements of BECC's design—namely, its binationality, openness to the public, and the existence of criteria for project certification—that give the institution the potential to promote innovative and sustainable solutions to border environmental degradation. The article then evaluates the commission's effectiveness in implementing these design components, concluding that, although BECC has stumbled occasionally in its first two years, it has made significant progress, demonstrating that it is capable of defining its agenda, implementing rules and procedures, devising certification criteria, and moving ahead to approve proposals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-119
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Borderlands Studies
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

environmental damage
certification
environmental degradation
border
co-operation
public
project

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Cite this

The u.s.–mexican border environment cooperation commission : Collected perspectives on the first two years. / Varady, Robert G; Colnic, David; Merideth, Robert; Sprouse, Terry.

In: Journal of Borderlands Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.01.1996, p. 89-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{438f53cdf15548cb8526a31246bc9899,
title = "The u.s.–mexican border environment cooperation commission: Collected perspectives on the first two years",
abstract = "This article assesses the first two years’ activities of the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC), and synthesizes the invited commentary from several BECC observers along both sides of the border. As a framework for assessment, the paper delineates several key elements of BECC's design—namely, its binationality, openness to the public, and the existence of criteria for project certification—that give the institution the potential to promote innovative and sustainable solutions to border environmental degradation. The article then evaluates the commission's effectiveness in implementing these design components, concluding that, although BECC has stumbled occasionally in its first two years, it has made significant progress, demonstrating that it is capable of defining its agenda, implementing rules and procedures, devising certification criteria, and moving ahead to approve proposals.",
author = "Varady, {Robert G} and David Colnic and Robert Merideth and Terry Sprouse",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08865655.1996.9695492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "89--119",
journal = "Journal of Borderlands Studies",
issn = "0886-5655",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The u.s.–mexican border environment cooperation commission

T2 - Collected perspectives on the first two years

AU - Varady, Robert G

AU - Colnic, David

AU - Merideth, Robert

AU - Sprouse, Terry

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - This article assesses the first two years’ activities of the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC), and synthesizes the invited commentary from several BECC observers along both sides of the border. As a framework for assessment, the paper delineates several key elements of BECC's design—namely, its binationality, openness to the public, and the existence of criteria for project certification—that give the institution the potential to promote innovative and sustainable solutions to border environmental degradation. The article then evaluates the commission's effectiveness in implementing these design components, concluding that, although BECC has stumbled occasionally in its first two years, it has made significant progress, demonstrating that it is capable of defining its agenda, implementing rules and procedures, devising certification criteria, and moving ahead to approve proposals.

AB - This article assesses the first two years’ activities of the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC), and synthesizes the invited commentary from several BECC observers along both sides of the border. As a framework for assessment, the paper delineates several key elements of BECC's design—namely, its binationality, openness to the public, and the existence of criteria for project certification—that give the institution the potential to promote innovative and sustainable solutions to border environmental degradation. The article then evaluates the commission's effectiveness in implementing these design components, concluding that, although BECC has stumbled occasionally in its first two years, it has made significant progress, demonstrating that it is capable of defining its agenda, implementing rules and procedures, devising certification criteria, and moving ahead to approve proposals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064779910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064779910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08865655.1996.9695492

DO - 10.1080/08865655.1996.9695492

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064779910

VL - 11

SP - 89

EP - 119

JO - Journal of Borderlands Studies

JF - Journal of Borderlands Studies

SN - 0886-5655

IS - 2

ER -