The value of information in floral cues

Bumblebee learning of floral size cues

Carla J. Essenberg, Rebekah A. Easter, Rachel A. Simmons, Daniel R Papaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many plant species, larger flowers offer larger or higher quality rewards to visitors, and flower visitors preferentially visit these larger, more rewarding flowers. Limited evidence suggests that plants in which flower size provides more reliable information about reward value have higher reproductive success than plants in which flower size offers less reliable information. We tested whether bumblebees could learn to respond to flower size when it was an informative reward cue while simultaneously learning not to respond to it when it was not informative. We also tested whether bees would develop a preference for a flower type that provided reward cues over one that did not. Bees were allowed to forage on an artificial array containing 2 flower types, each with a unique color and scent. In the informative flower type, large flowers contained sucrose rewards, whereas small flowers contained quinine solution (a deterrent). In the uninformative flower type, both flower sizes were equally likely to contain sucrose or quinine. Bees learned to prefer large flowers in the informative flower type and to be indifferent to flower size in the uninformative type. However, contrary to expectations, bees did not develop a preference for the informative type. These results suggest that although bees may benefit from floral cues that give information about rewards, plants offering these cues may not receive more flower visits than plants that do not.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1335-1344
Number of pages10
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2015

Fingerprint

Bombus
flower
learning
flowers
bee
Apoidea
quinine
sucrose

Keywords

  • Bombus impatiens
  • communication
  • foraging behavior
  • honest signaling
  • learning
  • pollination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

The value of information in floral cues : Bumblebee learning of floral size cues. / Essenberg, Carla J.; Easter, Rebekah A.; Simmons, Rachel A.; Papaj, Daniel R.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 28.07.2015, p. 1335-1344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Essenberg, Carla J. ; Easter, Rebekah A. ; Simmons, Rachel A. ; Papaj, Daniel R. / The value of information in floral cues : Bumblebee learning of floral size cues. In: Behavioral Ecology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 1335-1344.
@article{50eaa546220c4a459003420c04ccf318,
title = "The value of information in floral cues: Bumblebee learning of floral size cues",
abstract = "In many plant species, larger flowers offer larger or higher quality rewards to visitors, and flower visitors preferentially visit these larger, more rewarding flowers. Limited evidence suggests that plants in which flower size provides more reliable information about reward value have higher reproductive success than plants in which flower size offers less reliable information. We tested whether bumblebees could learn to respond to flower size when it was an informative reward cue while simultaneously learning not to respond to it when it was not informative. We also tested whether bees would develop a preference for a flower type that provided reward cues over one that did not. Bees were allowed to forage on an artificial array containing 2 flower types, each with a unique color and scent. In the informative flower type, large flowers contained sucrose rewards, whereas small flowers contained quinine solution (a deterrent). In the uninformative flower type, both flower sizes were equally likely to contain sucrose or quinine. Bees learned to prefer large flowers in the informative flower type and to be indifferent to flower size in the uninformative type. However, contrary to expectations, bees did not develop a preference for the informative type. These results suggest that although bees may benefit from floral cues that give information about rewards, plants offering these cues may not receive more flower visits than plants that do not.",
keywords = "Bombus impatiens, communication, foraging behavior, honest signaling, learning, pollination",
author = "Essenberg, {Carla J.} and Easter, {Rebekah A.} and Simmons, {Rachel A.} and Papaj, {Daniel R}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/arv061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1335--1344",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of information in floral cues

T2 - Bumblebee learning of floral size cues

AU - Essenberg, Carla J.

AU - Easter, Rebekah A.

AU - Simmons, Rachel A.

AU - Papaj, Daniel R

PY - 2015/7/28

Y1 - 2015/7/28

N2 - In many plant species, larger flowers offer larger or higher quality rewards to visitors, and flower visitors preferentially visit these larger, more rewarding flowers. Limited evidence suggests that plants in which flower size provides more reliable information about reward value have higher reproductive success than plants in which flower size offers less reliable information. We tested whether bumblebees could learn to respond to flower size when it was an informative reward cue while simultaneously learning not to respond to it when it was not informative. We also tested whether bees would develop a preference for a flower type that provided reward cues over one that did not. Bees were allowed to forage on an artificial array containing 2 flower types, each with a unique color and scent. In the informative flower type, large flowers contained sucrose rewards, whereas small flowers contained quinine solution (a deterrent). In the uninformative flower type, both flower sizes were equally likely to contain sucrose or quinine. Bees learned to prefer large flowers in the informative flower type and to be indifferent to flower size in the uninformative type. However, contrary to expectations, bees did not develop a preference for the informative type. These results suggest that although bees may benefit from floral cues that give information about rewards, plants offering these cues may not receive more flower visits than plants that do not.

AB - In many plant species, larger flowers offer larger or higher quality rewards to visitors, and flower visitors preferentially visit these larger, more rewarding flowers. Limited evidence suggests that plants in which flower size provides more reliable information about reward value have higher reproductive success than plants in which flower size offers less reliable information. We tested whether bumblebees could learn to respond to flower size when it was an informative reward cue while simultaneously learning not to respond to it when it was not informative. We also tested whether bees would develop a preference for a flower type that provided reward cues over one that did not. Bees were allowed to forage on an artificial array containing 2 flower types, each with a unique color and scent. In the informative flower type, large flowers contained sucrose rewards, whereas small flowers contained quinine solution (a deterrent). In the uninformative flower type, both flower sizes were equally likely to contain sucrose or quinine. Bees learned to prefer large flowers in the informative flower type and to be indifferent to flower size in the uninformative type. However, contrary to expectations, bees did not develop a preference for the informative type. These results suggest that although bees may benefit from floral cues that give information about rewards, plants offering these cues may not receive more flower visits than plants that do not.

KW - Bombus impatiens

KW - communication

KW - foraging behavior

KW - honest signaling

KW - learning

KW - pollination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941654735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941654735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/arv061

DO - 10.1093/beheco/arv061

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1335

EP - 1344

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 5

ER -