Theorizing women's representation in the United States

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From the perspective of women's experiences, it is easy to see that democratic representative institutions can be tools of oppression. After all, formal democratic institutions have been either a form of governance that has only ruled over women (e.g., women were formally prohibited from holding elected offices) or a form of governance in which women have ruled and been ruled unequally (e.g., the number of female representatives have been significantly lower than the number of male representatives). Moreover, there is good reason to believe that informal representative institutions, such as interest groups, do not work as well for multiply disadvantaged groups (Strolovitch 2007). These facts suggest that democratic representative institutions need to be viewed with suspicion. We need to know why democratic representative institutions do not work for women as well as they work for powerful men, and we need to know what conditions contribute to those institutions working better for women. We also should not assume that representative institutions in democracies necessarily benefit all women. In fact, we need to recognize how representative institutions can divide women, pitting some women's interests and preferences against other women's interests and preferences. Democratic representative institutions can function to preserve the status quo, distributing benefits unjustly and inequitably among different groups of women.Knowing if and how well representative institutions are working for women in democracies depends, in part, on one's understanding of what counts as the adequate representation of women in a democracy. Does the adequate representation of women require female representatives?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPolitical Women and American Democracy
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages148-166
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9780511790621, 9780521886239
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

democracy
governance
oppression
interest group
Group
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Dovi, S. L. (2008). Theorizing women's representation in the United States. In Political Women and American Democracy (pp. 148-166). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012

Theorizing women's representation in the United States. / Dovi, Suzanne L.

Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 148-166.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Dovi, SL 2008, Theorizing women's representation in the United States. in Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012
Dovi SL. Theorizing women's representation in the United States. In Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 148-166 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012
Dovi, Suzanne L. / Theorizing women's representation in the United States. Political Women and American Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 148-166
@inbook{8b1497c38e164b44b7166bfaef191a41,
title = "Theorizing women's representation in the United States",
abstract = "From the perspective of women's experiences, it is easy to see that democratic representative institutions can be tools of oppression. After all, formal democratic institutions have been either a form of governance that has only ruled over women (e.g., women were formally prohibited from holding elected offices) or a form of governance in which women have ruled and been ruled unequally (e.g., the number of female representatives have been significantly lower than the number of male representatives). Moreover, there is good reason to believe that informal representative institutions, such as interest groups, do not work as well for multiply disadvantaged groups (Strolovitch 2007). These facts suggest that democratic representative institutions need to be viewed with suspicion. We need to know why democratic representative institutions do not work for women as well as they work for powerful men, and we need to know what conditions contribute to those institutions working better for women. We also should not assume that representative institutions in democracies necessarily benefit all women. In fact, we need to recognize how representative institutions can divide women, pitting some women's interests and preferences against other women's interests and preferences. Democratic representative institutions can function to preserve the status quo, distributing benefits unjustly and inequitably among different groups of women.Knowing if and how well representative institutions are working for women in democracies depends, in part, on one's understanding of what counts as the adequate representation of women in a democracy. Does the adequate representation of women require female representatives?",
author = "Dovi, {Suzanne L}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511790621",
pages = "148--166",
booktitle = "Political Women and American Democracy",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Theorizing women's representation in the United States

AU - Dovi, Suzanne L

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - From the perspective of women's experiences, it is easy to see that democratic representative institutions can be tools of oppression. After all, formal democratic institutions have been either a form of governance that has only ruled over women (e.g., women were formally prohibited from holding elected offices) or a form of governance in which women have ruled and been ruled unequally (e.g., the number of female representatives have been significantly lower than the number of male representatives). Moreover, there is good reason to believe that informal representative institutions, such as interest groups, do not work as well for multiply disadvantaged groups (Strolovitch 2007). These facts suggest that democratic representative institutions need to be viewed with suspicion. We need to know why democratic representative institutions do not work for women as well as they work for powerful men, and we need to know what conditions contribute to those institutions working better for women. We also should not assume that representative institutions in democracies necessarily benefit all women. In fact, we need to recognize how representative institutions can divide women, pitting some women's interests and preferences against other women's interests and preferences. Democratic representative institutions can function to preserve the status quo, distributing benefits unjustly and inequitably among different groups of women.Knowing if and how well representative institutions are working for women in democracies depends, in part, on one's understanding of what counts as the adequate representation of women in a democracy. Does the adequate representation of women require female representatives?

AB - From the perspective of women's experiences, it is easy to see that democratic representative institutions can be tools of oppression. After all, formal democratic institutions have been either a form of governance that has only ruled over women (e.g., women were formally prohibited from holding elected offices) or a form of governance in which women have ruled and been ruled unequally (e.g., the number of female representatives have been significantly lower than the number of male representatives). Moreover, there is good reason to believe that informal representative institutions, such as interest groups, do not work as well for multiply disadvantaged groups (Strolovitch 2007). These facts suggest that democratic representative institutions need to be viewed with suspicion. We need to know why democratic representative institutions do not work for women as well as they work for powerful men, and we need to know what conditions contribute to those institutions working better for women. We also should not assume that representative institutions in democracies necessarily benefit all women. In fact, we need to recognize how representative institutions can divide women, pitting some women's interests and preferences against other women's interests and preferences. Democratic representative institutions can function to preserve the status quo, distributing benefits unjustly and inequitably among different groups of women.Knowing if and how well representative institutions are working for women in democracies depends, in part, on one's understanding of what counts as the adequate representation of women in a democracy. Does the adequate representation of women require female representatives?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856783227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856783227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511790621.012

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84856783227

SN - 9780511790621

SN - 9780521886239

SP - 148

EP - 166

BT - Political Women and American Democracy

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -