There can be no compromise

Institutional inclusiveness, fractionalization and domestic terrorism

Dennis M. Foster, Alex R Braithwaite, David Sobek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on terrorism in democracies borrows from the literature on civil war and rebellion to argue that more proportional representation decreases the likelihood of terrorist violence. However, theories of broader social mobilization may be ill-suited to predicting the occurrence of terrorism. This article proposes that proportionalism's institutionalization of small minority groups as legitimate but relatively insignificant political actors leads to militancy. Analyses of the Global Terrorism Database on domestic terrorist attacks across all democracies in 1975-2007 provide broad support for this argument. The presence and greater degrees of proportionalism are significantly associated with greater levels of domestic terrorism when ethnic fractionalization within a given society increases. Moreover, domestic terrorism increases as the number of small parties represented in the legislature increases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)541-557
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

compromise
terrorism
democracy
militancy
proportional representation
political actor
institutionalization
civil war
mobilization
minority
violence
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

There can be no compromise : Institutional inclusiveness, fractionalization and domestic terrorism. / Foster, Dennis M.; Braithwaite, Alex R; Sobek, David.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 541-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a005224b8741424ca0f0bd02676c13a5,
title = "There can be no compromise: Institutional inclusiveness, fractionalization and domestic terrorism",
abstract = "Research on terrorism in democracies borrows from the literature on civil war and rebellion to argue that more proportional representation decreases the likelihood of terrorist violence. However, theories of broader social mobilization may be ill-suited to predicting the occurrence of terrorism. This article proposes that proportionalism's institutionalization of small minority groups as legitimate but relatively insignificant political actors leads to militancy. Analyses of the Global Terrorism Database on domestic terrorist attacks across all democracies in 1975-2007 provide broad support for this argument. The presence and greater degrees of proportionalism are significantly associated with greater levels of domestic terrorism when ethnic fractionalization within a given society increases. Moreover, domestic terrorism increases as the number of small parties represented in the legislature increases.",
author = "Foster, {Dennis M.} and Braithwaite, {Alex R} and David Sobek",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123412000464",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "541--557",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - There can be no compromise

T2 - Institutional inclusiveness, fractionalization and domestic terrorism

AU - Foster, Dennis M.

AU - Braithwaite, Alex R

AU - Sobek, David

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Research on terrorism in democracies borrows from the literature on civil war and rebellion to argue that more proportional representation decreases the likelihood of terrorist violence. However, theories of broader social mobilization may be ill-suited to predicting the occurrence of terrorism. This article proposes that proportionalism's institutionalization of small minority groups as legitimate but relatively insignificant political actors leads to militancy. Analyses of the Global Terrorism Database on domestic terrorist attacks across all democracies in 1975-2007 provide broad support for this argument. The presence and greater degrees of proportionalism are significantly associated with greater levels of domestic terrorism when ethnic fractionalization within a given society increases. Moreover, domestic terrorism increases as the number of small parties represented in the legislature increases.

AB - Research on terrorism in democracies borrows from the literature on civil war and rebellion to argue that more proportional representation decreases the likelihood of terrorist violence. However, theories of broader social mobilization may be ill-suited to predicting the occurrence of terrorism. This article proposes that proportionalism's institutionalization of small minority groups as legitimate but relatively insignificant political actors leads to militancy. Analyses of the Global Terrorism Database on domestic terrorist attacks across all democracies in 1975-2007 provide broad support for this argument. The presence and greater degrees of proportionalism are significantly associated with greater levels of domestic terrorism when ethnic fractionalization within a given society increases. Moreover, domestic terrorism increases as the number of small parties represented in the legislature increases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878692883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878692883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123412000464

DO - 10.1017/S0007123412000464

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 541

EP - 557

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

IS - 3

ER -