Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946-2000

Derrick V. Frazier, William J Dixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past studies regarding the success and/or failure of conflict management activities have brought about a wide range of results. In this paper we attempt to gain more definitive conclusions about effectiveness by accomplishing two tasks. First, using a basic theoretical framework we identify expectations of efficacy as they relate to differences between states, coalitions, and IGOs. Second, we also examine the utility of different conflict management techniques in an effort to place in greater perspective the effectiveness of mediation, the most utilized technique of third party intermediaries. Using a new dataset on third-party intermediary behavior in militarized disputes from 1946 to 2000, we find that while all conflict managers are useful in assisting belligerents in reaching a negotiated settlement, IGOs are the most effective. Additionally, while mediation is an effective technique to produce settlements, military intermediary actions, such as peacekeeping, are much more useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-408
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

conflict management
mediation
peacekeeping
coalition
Military
manager

Keywords

  • Conflict management
  • Mediation
  • Negotiated settlement
  • Peacekeeping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946-2000. / Frazier, Derrick V.; Dixon, William J.

In: International Interactions, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.12.2006, p. 385-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27d03a651b4a465a85824ffa8e63edb9,
title = "Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946-2000",
abstract = "Past studies regarding the success and/or failure of conflict management activities have brought about a wide range of results. In this paper we attempt to gain more definitive conclusions about effectiveness by accomplishing two tasks. First, using a basic theoretical framework we identify expectations of efficacy as they relate to differences between states, coalitions, and IGOs. Second, we also examine the utility of different conflict management techniques in an effort to place in greater perspective the effectiveness of mediation, the most utilized technique of third party intermediaries. Using a new dataset on third-party intermediary behavior in militarized disputes from 1946 to 2000, we find that while all conflict managers are useful in assisting belligerents in reaching a negotiated settlement, IGOs are the most effective. Additionally, while mediation is an effective technique to produce settlements, military intermediary actions, such as peacekeeping, are much more useful.",
keywords = "Conflict management, Mediation, Negotiated settlement, Peacekeeping",
author = "Frazier, {Derrick V.} and Dixon, {William J}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03050620601011057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "385--408",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Third-party intermediaries and negotiated settlements, 1946-2000

AU - Frazier, Derrick V.

AU - Dixon, William J

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Past studies regarding the success and/or failure of conflict management activities have brought about a wide range of results. In this paper we attempt to gain more definitive conclusions about effectiveness by accomplishing two tasks. First, using a basic theoretical framework we identify expectations of efficacy as they relate to differences between states, coalitions, and IGOs. Second, we also examine the utility of different conflict management techniques in an effort to place in greater perspective the effectiveness of mediation, the most utilized technique of third party intermediaries. Using a new dataset on third-party intermediary behavior in militarized disputes from 1946 to 2000, we find that while all conflict managers are useful in assisting belligerents in reaching a negotiated settlement, IGOs are the most effective. Additionally, while mediation is an effective technique to produce settlements, military intermediary actions, such as peacekeeping, are much more useful.

AB - Past studies regarding the success and/or failure of conflict management activities have brought about a wide range of results. In this paper we attempt to gain more definitive conclusions about effectiveness by accomplishing two tasks. First, using a basic theoretical framework we identify expectations of efficacy as they relate to differences between states, coalitions, and IGOs. Second, we also examine the utility of different conflict management techniques in an effort to place in greater perspective the effectiveness of mediation, the most utilized technique of third party intermediaries. Using a new dataset on third-party intermediary behavior in militarized disputes from 1946 to 2000, we find that while all conflict managers are useful in assisting belligerents in reaching a negotiated settlement, IGOs are the most effective. Additionally, while mediation is an effective technique to produce settlements, military intermediary actions, such as peacekeeping, are much more useful.

KW - Conflict management

KW - Mediation

KW - Negotiated settlement

KW - Peacekeeping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845746653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845746653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03050620601011057

DO - 10.1080/03050620601011057

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845746653

VL - 32

SP - 385

EP - 408

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 4

ER -