Three dimensional response of RC bridges under spatially varying seismic excitation - Numerical analysis and observations

Carlos Enrique Pẽa Ramos, Achintya Haldar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The theoretical foundation of a procedure to estimate three-dimensional nonlinear time domain responses of bridges subjected to spatially varying seismic excitations (SVSE) presented in the companion paper is clarified further with the help of several informative examples. The procedure will satisfy the current design guidelines suggested in the International Building Code (IBC). Considering two piers in a bent and 3-, 6-, and 12- equal span bridges supported on the hard, medium, and soft soil conditions, the longitudinal and transverse responses of the bridges are estimated using the proposed method. The results are expressed in terms of rotational ductility demand (DD) at pier plastic hinge locations. The difference in responses between spatially varying and uniform seismic excitations is studied by introducing a new pier ductility index (DI) parameter by taking the ratio of the corresponding DD values. The near-field excitation is considered by increasing the vertical component of a design seismic wave. Several important observations are made for both far- and near-field excitations. For far-field condition, ignoring SVSE will typically result in the underestimation of the DD regardless of the length of the bridge and the type of soil under the piers. The underestimation could be as high as 64% for 12-span bridges supported on soft soil conditions. However, all piers in bridges considered in this study appear to satisfy AASHTO LRFD seismic design limitations on DD. The pier DD was found to be more sensitive to the variations in the types of soil under the piers than variations in the length of the bridges. The transverse DD values exceeded the longitudinal values for a significant number of piers in 3-span and 12-span bridges. Although the increases in pier DD were found to be relatively small for near-field excitation, the reduction in the pier ductility range can cause more piers to experience significant structural damage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-278
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Structural Engineering (Madras)
Volume41
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Ductility
Numerical analysis
Piers
Bridge piers
Soils
Seismic waves
Seismic design
Hinges
Plastics

Keywords

  • Bridge pier bidirectional plastic hinges
  • Bridge three-dimensional nonlinear seismic response
  • Far-field and near-field seismic excitation
  • Pier rotational ductility demand
  • Soil dynamic stiffness
  • Spatially varying seismic excitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Three dimensional response of RC bridges under spatially varying seismic excitation - Numerical analysis and observations. / Ramos, Carlos Enrique Pẽa; Haldar, Achintya.

In: Journal of Structural Engineering (Madras), Vol. 41, No. 3, 2014, p. 265-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81bfb747bb93454aae07ea8cb38ce44f,
title = "Three dimensional response of RC bridges under spatially varying seismic excitation - Numerical analysis and observations",
abstract = "The theoretical foundation of a procedure to estimate three-dimensional nonlinear time domain responses of bridges subjected to spatially varying seismic excitations (SVSE) presented in the companion paper is clarified further with the help of several informative examples. The procedure will satisfy the current design guidelines suggested in the International Building Code (IBC). Considering two piers in a bent and 3-, 6-, and 12- equal span bridges supported on the hard, medium, and soft soil conditions, the longitudinal and transverse responses of the bridges are estimated using the proposed method. The results are expressed in terms of rotational ductility demand (DD) at pier plastic hinge locations. The difference in responses between spatially varying and uniform seismic excitations is studied by introducing a new pier ductility index (DI) parameter by taking the ratio of the corresponding DD values. The near-field excitation is considered by increasing the vertical component of a design seismic wave. Several important observations are made for both far- and near-field excitations. For far-field condition, ignoring SVSE will typically result in the underestimation of the DD regardless of the length of the bridge and the type of soil under the piers. The underestimation could be as high as 64{\%} for 12-span bridges supported on soft soil conditions. However, all piers in bridges considered in this study appear to satisfy AASHTO LRFD seismic design limitations on DD. The pier DD was found to be more sensitive to the variations in the types of soil under the piers than variations in the length of the bridges. The transverse DD values exceeded the longitudinal values for a significant number of piers in 3-span and 12-span bridges. Although the increases in pier DD were found to be relatively small for near-field excitation, the reduction in the pier ductility range can cause more piers to experience significant structural damage.",
keywords = "Bridge pier bidirectional plastic hinges, Bridge three-dimensional nonlinear seismic response, Far-field and near-field seismic excitation, Pier rotational ductility demand, Soil dynamic stiffness, Spatially varying seismic excitation",
author = "Ramos, {Carlos Enrique Pẽa} and Achintya Haldar",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "265--278",
journal = "Journal of Structural Engineering (Madras)",
issn = "0970-0137",
publisher = "Structural Engineering Research Centre",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three dimensional response of RC bridges under spatially varying seismic excitation - Numerical analysis and observations

AU - Ramos, Carlos Enrique Pẽa

AU - Haldar, Achintya

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The theoretical foundation of a procedure to estimate three-dimensional nonlinear time domain responses of bridges subjected to spatially varying seismic excitations (SVSE) presented in the companion paper is clarified further with the help of several informative examples. The procedure will satisfy the current design guidelines suggested in the International Building Code (IBC). Considering two piers in a bent and 3-, 6-, and 12- equal span bridges supported on the hard, medium, and soft soil conditions, the longitudinal and transverse responses of the bridges are estimated using the proposed method. The results are expressed in terms of rotational ductility demand (DD) at pier plastic hinge locations. The difference in responses between spatially varying and uniform seismic excitations is studied by introducing a new pier ductility index (DI) parameter by taking the ratio of the corresponding DD values. The near-field excitation is considered by increasing the vertical component of a design seismic wave. Several important observations are made for both far- and near-field excitations. For far-field condition, ignoring SVSE will typically result in the underestimation of the DD regardless of the length of the bridge and the type of soil under the piers. The underestimation could be as high as 64% for 12-span bridges supported on soft soil conditions. However, all piers in bridges considered in this study appear to satisfy AASHTO LRFD seismic design limitations on DD. The pier DD was found to be more sensitive to the variations in the types of soil under the piers than variations in the length of the bridges. The transverse DD values exceeded the longitudinal values for a significant number of piers in 3-span and 12-span bridges. Although the increases in pier DD were found to be relatively small for near-field excitation, the reduction in the pier ductility range can cause more piers to experience significant structural damage.

AB - The theoretical foundation of a procedure to estimate three-dimensional nonlinear time domain responses of bridges subjected to spatially varying seismic excitations (SVSE) presented in the companion paper is clarified further with the help of several informative examples. The procedure will satisfy the current design guidelines suggested in the International Building Code (IBC). Considering two piers in a bent and 3-, 6-, and 12- equal span bridges supported on the hard, medium, and soft soil conditions, the longitudinal and transverse responses of the bridges are estimated using the proposed method. The results are expressed in terms of rotational ductility demand (DD) at pier plastic hinge locations. The difference in responses between spatially varying and uniform seismic excitations is studied by introducing a new pier ductility index (DI) parameter by taking the ratio of the corresponding DD values. The near-field excitation is considered by increasing the vertical component of a design seismic wave. Several important observations are made for both far- and near-field excitations. For far-field condition, ignoring SVSE will typically result in the underestimation of the DD regardless of the length of the bridge and the type of soil under the piers. The underestimation could be as high as 64% for 12-span bridges supported on soft soil conditions. However, all piers in bridges considered in this study appear to satisfy AASHTO LRFD seismic design limitations on DD. The pier DD was found to be more sensitive to the variations in the types of soil under the piers than variations in the length of the bridges. The transverse DD values exceeded the longitudinal values for a significant number of piers in 3-span and 12-span bridges. Although the increases in pier DD were found to be relatively small for near-field excitation, the reduction in the pier ductility range can cause more piers to experience significant structural damage.

KW - Bridge pier bidirectional plastic hinges

KW - Bridge three-dimensional nonlinear seismic response

KW - Far-field and near-field seismic excitation

KW - Pier rotational ductility demand

KW - Soil dynamic stiffness

KW - Spatially varying seismic excitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907369837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907369837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84907369837

VL - 41

SP - 265

EP - 278

JO - Journal of Structural Engineering (Madras)

JF - Journal of Structural Engineering (Madras)

SN - 0970-0137

IS - 3

ER -