Three views of demonstrative reference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three views of demonstrative reference are examined: 'contextual', 'intentional', and 'quasi-intentional'. According to the first, such reference is determined entirely by certain publicly accessible features of the context. According to the second, speaker intentions are 'criterial' in demonstrative reference. And according to the third, both contextual features and intentions come into play in the determination of demonstrative reference. The first two views (both of which enjoy current popularity) are rejected as implausible; the third (originally proposed by Kaplan in 'Dthat') is argued to be highly plausible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-402
Number of pages30
JournalSynthese
Volume93
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Three views of demonstrative reference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this